Who Is John Ratcliffe? Trump Taps Loyalist to Oversee Intelligence - Rolling Stone
Home Politics Politics News

How John Ratcliffe Nailed His Audition to Become Trump’s New Intelligence Chief

Bashing Robert Mueller on national TV is a surefire way to get the president’s attention

Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas., asks questions to former special counsel Robert Mueller, as he testifies before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on his report on Russian election interference, on Capitol Hill, in Washington on July 24th, 2019.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) asks questions to former special counsel Robert Mueller as he testifies before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on July 24th, 2019.

Andrew Harnik/AP/Shutterstock

A week ago, Rep. John Radcliffe (R-Texas) was a largely anonymous congressman serving on the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees. On Sunday night, President Trump announced he would be nominating him to oversee America’s intelligence community, a position for which Ratcliffe is woefully under-qualified. Why? Look no further than Ratcliffe’s performance during former special counsel Robert Mueller’s testimony last Wednesday.

In lieu of asking questions of Mueller, Ratcliffe used his five minutes to make a show of excoriating Mueller for noting that the special counsel report did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice. Ratcliffe argued that, considering Mueller chose not to prosecute the president, it was outside of his legal purview to elaborate on a decision he chose not to make.

When Mueller tried to explain why the situation was “unique,” Ratcliffe cut him off and continued to rant. “Donald Trump is not above the law. He’s not,” Ratcliffe concluded with a flourish. “But he damn sure shouldn’t be below the law, which is where Volume 2 of this report puts him,” Ratcliffe said.

It was exactly the kind of sound bite designed to earn plaudits from Trump. So too was his appearance on Fox News Sunday morning. “I’m not going to accuse any specific person of any specific crime,” he told Maria Bartiromo. “I just want there to be a fair process to get there. What I do know, as a former federal prosecutor, is, it does appear that there were crimes committed during the Obama administration.”

Trump announced the nomination hours later. “I am pleased to announce that highly respected Congressman John Ratcliffe of Texas will be nominated by me to be the Director of National Intelligence,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and inspire greatness for the Country he loves. Dan Coats, the current Director, will be leaving office on August 15th. I would like to thank Dan for his great service to our Country. The Acting Director will be named shortly.”

Though Ratcliffe’s nomination probably shouldn’t be attributed solely what took place over the past week (Ratcliffe was already under consideration prior to the hearing), it certainly helped, with Trump reportedly having been impressed by his performance during the Mueller hearing, calling him a “warrior.”

Ratcliffe was quick to accept Trump’s nomination on Sunday night.

One tricky issue here is that Ratcliffe doesn’t have much experience in intelligence other than serving on the House Intelligence Community. He’s only been in Congress since 2015. Before that, he was the mayor of Heath, Texas, a small town in the northeast part of the state with a population of around 7,000. He was also a U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Texas during the final year of George W. Bush’s presidency.

More important to Trump is Ratcliffe’s loyalty, which is all but assured. The ultra-conservative congressman has long railed against Mueller’s investigation, often using the same language as the president, and has stood by Trump’s side throughout several controversial move, including his “travel ban” on predominantly Muslim nations.

Not so loyal, in Trump’s eyes, was now-outgoing Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who has repeatedly warned about Russian interference in America’s election systems, causing friction with the president. His ouster and Ratcliffe’s nomination marks another instance of Trump replacing someone who disagreed with him with someone guaranteed to tow the White House line.

Democrats did not take kindly to the nomination. “I don’t know this guy,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) during an appearance on MSNBC. “I think he’s a television character that the president has watched on TV, and he wants to put somebody in this position who’s going to agree with his political take on intelligence.”

“It’s clear Rep. Ratcliffe was selected because he exhibited blind loyalty to @realDonaldTrump with his demagogic questioning of Mueller,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) tweeted on Sunday. “If Senate Republicans elevate such a partisan player to a position requiring intelligence expertise & non-partisanship, it’d be a big mistake.”

Don’t get your hopes up, Chuck.

In This Article: Donald Trump, John Ratcliffe


Powered by
Arrow Created with Sketch. Calendar Created with Sketch. Path Created with Sketch. Shape Created with Sketch. Plus Created with Sketch. minus Created with Sketch.