If This Is Civil War, What Comes Next? - Rolling Stone
×
×
Home Politics Politics News

If This Is Civil War, What Comes Next?

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, speaking in Dubai yesterday, labeled Iraq a Civil War and called on president Bush to quit debating the semantics of the violence on the ground there.

Yet it seems to me that there’s actually a good reason not to call what’s going on right now a Civil War. For the simple reason that it robs us of adequate language to describe a conflict that is orders of magnitude worse than what we’re currently witnessing. The conflict that Iraq is on a steep and rapid decent toward becoming.

Iraq is on fire. But the sparks we’re seeing are only from the fuse. The powder keg hasn’t burst yet…

A bit of news from yesterday: President Bush is going to let Rumsfeld stay on through the end of December as a personal gesture, letting him retire as the longest-serving SECDEF ever.

But given the way the the security situation is unravelling in Iraq presently, I’m honestly afraid we don’t have that long for a drastic change of course.

I worry, too, that by the time the Baker/Hamilton commission comes up with its recommedations for Iraq, that they’ll be immediately obselete, suited to an Iraq pre- [[insert pogrom, temple bombing, mass immolation, coordinated nationwide bus bombing, future atrocity of your worst imagining here]].

The time for bold leadership — which involves bringing all parties, the Saudis the Syrians the Iranians the Jordanians the Turks, NATO, Russia, everybody, to the table to hammer out a plan for partition or whatever has a half chance of working — is now.

Not next year, when Iraq’s Ka-Boom may well have been heard throughout the world.

Newswire

Powered by
Arrow Created with Sketch. Calendar Created with Sketch. Path Created with Sketch. Shape Created with Sketch. Plus Created with Sketch. minus Created with Sketch.