Where Did the Rock Hits Go? - Rolling Stone
Home Music Music News

Where Did the Rock Hits Go?

In 2010, there wasn’t a single major rock hit. What happened?

Where Did the Rock Hits Go?Where Did the Rock Hits Go?

Where are the rock hits?


IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY of rock & roll, 2010 was a commercial low point, a year without hits. Not a single rock record wound up in the year-end Top 25. Jack Johnson’s To the Sea scored highest, coming in at Number 27. In an era of tanking sales, rock did even worse than the competition, falling more sharply than coun­try, hip-hop or pop. And bands that sold millions of copies of their last al­bums, from Linkin Park to the Kings of Leon, stiffed. Says Doug Podell, a vet­eran Detroit programmer who is now a consultant and WCSX classic-rock DJ, “Rock isn’t dead yet, but it’s getting pushed around pretty good.”

So what happened? Rolling Stone spoke to 21 music-business sourc­es, and the picture that emerged was of a rock drought driven by two forces: a lack of compel­ling mainstream releases and broad, industrywide trends that work against the genre.

The first problem is par­tially the result of top acts’ release cycles coincidentally making 2010 an off year. “There just weren’t that many strong releases,” says Ish Cuebas, Trans World Entertainment’s vice president for merchandising music. Even Mike Shinoda, Linkin Park’s co-founder, didn’t find much to listen to: “As a music listen­er, I was gravitating a little bit away from [new] rock records, because stylistically it was a lit­tle boring.”

But rock’s real problems are trickier, and interconnected. Many in the business blame radio for failing to break a major album for the first time in mem­ory. (Even in 2000, the year of Britney and boy bands, Creed’s Human Clay sold 6.5 million copies.) Thanks to important stations switch­ing formats in re­cent years, a Num­ber One rock-radio hit leaches just 12 million listeners, compared with 81 million for Top 40. This gap is far wider than it was in 2009 or 2006, according to Niel­sen SoundScan. And many of the stations that are left have seen their ratings fall. “I don’t know if it’s cyclical — it’s prob­lematic,” says Richard Palmese, executive vice president for promotion at the RCA Music Group, home of the Kings of Leon and Daughtry. “Rock-radio stations are struggling in markets around the country to deliver winning ratings.”

In addition, two of rock’s biggest subgenres petered out in 2010 — emo/pop-punk and Nickelback-and-Shinedown-style “active” rock. “Emo had its heyday — then there were too many bands that sound­ed like Fall Out Boy,” says Bob McLynn, manager of that band, as well as Hole, Train and Panic! at the Disco. As a result, major record labels are shying away from signing new rock acts and spending less money on the ones they have, according to industry sources. “[Labels] seem like they don’t want to be in that business anymore — not ideally, anyway,” says Peter Katsis, manager of Korn and Jane’s Addiction. “You’re just seeing them spend a lot less money on marketing and promoting rock acts.”

Major labels have also made 360-degree deals the stan­dard for new acts, which gives the labels a cut of concert and merchandise sales. With ma­jors and rock radio losing their power to reliably produce hits, bands that do well on the road have little incentive to sign such deals. “We still are extreme­ly, extremely focused on bands who can tour,” says James Diener, president of A&M/Octone, which reps Flyleaf and Maroon 5.

Given the unfriendly en­vironment, top artists have begun fleeing the majors, ei­ther to release music on their own (Wilco, Nine Inch Nails, Radiohead) or to shift to small­er, more attentive labels, as Paul McCartney and Paul Simon have done with Concord Music Group. Says Tony Margherita, Wilco’s manager, “For a certain level of artist who has spent some time building a ca­reer and has a fan base, the structure and the services provided by a major label — and the percentage they take to provide those services — doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

Rock maintains its domi­nance in one crucial area: tour­ing. Bon Jovi, Roger Waters and the Dave Matthews Band were Pollstar‘s top three acts on the road last year, grossing a combined $270 million.

A new middle class of bands — Arcade Fire, the National and Spoon — all sold respectable numbers of records while thriv­ing on the road, without need­ing hits on rock radio. Some of those, like Mumford and Sons, Vampire Weekend and the Black Keys, thrived by touring relentlessly and breaking their singles via college stations, SiriusXM programs and ad li­censing to clients from Cadil­lac to Tommy Hilfiger. “If you look at the most prominent fes­tivals — Coachella, Bonnaroo, Austin City Limits — they’re doing pretty good business with basically a rock-band for­mat,” says Daniel Glass, chief executive of Glassnote Enter­tainment Group, Mumford and Sons’ independent label. “The club business, in most parts of America, also has a healthy cir­cuit of artists that are touring and doing quite well.”

And 2011 looks better than 2010, with planned releases by superstar rock acts includ­ing Green Day, Coldplay, Radiohead, R.E.M., the Strokes, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, U2 and Foo Fighters. “It’s just the cycle,” says Rob McDermott, former manager of Linkin Park. “The ‘Is Rock Sleeping?’ article comes out every five years, and I actually think it’s the great­est article in the world, because you’re foreshadowing it’s about to make a big comeback.”

In This Article: Coverwall, Radio, record label


Powered by
Arrow Created with Sketch. Calendar Created with Sketch. Path Created with Sketch. Shape Created with Sketch. Plus Created with Sketch. minus Created with Sketch.