Home Movies Movie Lists

Readers’ Poll: The 20 Most Disappointing Movie Sequels

‘Caddyshack II,’ ‘Batman & Robin’ and other heinously bad second acts

Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace

Lucasfilm Ltd./Courtesy Everett Collection

It's not easy to make a great sequel. Not only is it hard to capture magic twice, but it's always tempting to simply repeat a winning formula. But sequels are almost guaranteed box-office hits, so they keep coming. Think of Liam Neeson and the Taken movies. At first, he laughed at the idea of a third movie in the series. "How many times can she be taken?" he asked. "I mean, that's just bad parenting." Well, as we speak he's filming Taken 3 for a reported $20 million. The plot isn't public yet, but it's almost certainly ludicrously stupid beyond belief. We asked our readers to select the most disappointing sequels of all time. Click through to see the results. 

Play video

4. ‘Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull’

A fourth Indiana Jones was the stuff of Internet rumors and playground gossip for years before it became a reality. To paraphrase the great Dr. Ian Malcom from an earlier, much better Steven Spielberg movie, "They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should." The screenplay just wasn't there, and bringing in Shia LaBeouf as Indy's long-lost son was a critical error. "I feel like I dropped the ball on the legacy that people loved and cherished," LeBeouf said in 2010. "We [Harrison Ford and LaBeouf] had major discussions. He wasn't happy with it either. Look, the movie could have been updated. There was a reason it wasn't universally accepted." It was a rare instance of an actor being honest about a botched movie, and he quickly lived to regret saying it. But he wasn't wrong. 

Play video

3. ‘The Godfather: Part III’

Francis Ford Coppola was the single most acclaimed director of the 1970s, but his career totally fell apart in the 1980s after a series of disastrous bombs like One from the Heart and The Cotton Club. In 1990, he finally caved into years of pressure and made a third Godfather movie. Robert Duvall refused to come back and Winona Ryder dropped out of a key role just before filming began. In an historic error, he brought in his daughter Sofia to take over the part. She's become an amazing director in her own right, but at the time she was a teenager with no real acting experience. The movie isn't quite as bad as legend suggests, but it's incredibly unnecessary and can't even begin to compare to the first two, but then nothing really could. This was doomed to be a failure from the start.

Play video

2. ‘Caddyshack II’

When even Rodney Dangerfield refused to come on board for a Caddyshack sequel, the studio should have realized they had a problem on their hands. Instead, the hired Jackie Mason, Randy Quaid and Dan Akyroyd and plowed ahead with another movie about slobs battling snobs at a golf course. Chevy Chase returned, but that man doesn't know the word "no" and even he later said it was a mistake. Harold Ramis did co-write it, though he later asked the studio to take his name off it. He changed his mind when they said it would cause all sorts of negative press, but the film had bigger problems and it totally tanked. 

Play video

1. ‘Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace’

In hindsight, the signs were everywhere that Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace was going to be an epic disappointment. With the notable exception of the Indiana Jones movies, George Lucas wasn't exactly involved in many great films in the 1980s and 1990s. Also, he opted to write and direct Phantom Menace completely by himself. (He had lots of help on the originals.) Finally, Jar Jar Binks was annoying even in the brief trailer. South Park was making fun of him before anyone had seen the movie, though a certain magazine put him on the cover with the cover line "Superstar." Whoops.

Still, everyone wanted to believe and some otherwise sane people didn't immediately realize it was a turd. Roger Ebert even gave it three-and-a-half stars. "It is an astonishing achievement in imaginative filmmaking," he wrote. "There is a sense of discovery in scene after scene as [Lucas] tries out new effects and ideas, and seamlessly integrates real characters and digital ones, real landscapes and imaginary places." It's a rare instance of Ebert being off, and it's endlessly sad he won't be around to see the upcoming seventh movie in the series. Let's all pray J.J. Abrams doesn't botch this. We can only stand so much Star Wars-related disappointment in one lifetime. 

Show Comments