Previous Next Latest

Perry Farrell Gets Shocked: Jane’s Addiction Frontman on SXSW Gig, Reznor Sessions, Lollapalooza

3/23/09, 7:38 pm EST

It’s been 21 years since Jane’s Addiction released Nothing’s Shocking, and frontman Perry Farrell has finally found a cultural phenomenon that refutes the memorable refrain from “Ted, Just Admit It …” “The Octo-Mom is shocking, so there you go,” he says. “It finally happened. I’m shocked.”

Hanging out with Rolling Stone the day after Jane’s Addiction’s triumphant South By Southwest gig at a former supermarket, Farrell says the group kicked the show off with “Three Days,” a song that used to fall in the middle of sets, because “When the thought clicked in, I got a chill. I love an entrance that’s like an orgasm, so it keeps building and then you have multiples. So in that song, it’s not just ‘Yay, there they are!’ and it fizzles. The song keeps coming on and coming on and coming on, you start to have multiple orgasms.”

(Click above to watch Farrell open up about Dave Navarro’s guitar and driving skills, the band’s first days back in the studio with Trent Reznor and what fans might expect at Lollapalooza.)

It was the band’s third gig with its original lineup — Farrell, guitarist Dave Navarro, drummer Stephen Perkins and bassist Eric Avery — and Farrell admits the reunion hasn’t been a totally smooth ride. “It’s very awkward. I have seen Eric maybe two times in 18 years very briefly, one time we almost got into a fistfight. We’re all getting to know each other now to see if we’ve all changed for the better, if we can like each other and find common ground and ways to do things that will be successful together.”

Jane’s Addiction have already hit the studio with Trent Reznor, and while Farrell says those sessions likely won’t produce a full album, they have yielded two new recordings of songs from Jane’s self-titled 1987 live album, “Whores” and “Chip Away.” But Perry isn’t overly concerned about releasing an LP: “The young groups here today at SXSW, they need to come up with a nice body of work so when they go out and play a 70-minute set, everyone knows all of those songs,” he says. “But the older cats, people love the songs, you don’t have time for nine new songs. People don’t have time for nine new songs on a record, either. I look for a hot new single. In our case, Jane’s Addiction has our set. At the same time we want to keep our creative juice flowing and keep current. When you hear a song that you know and love, there’s very few things in this world that can instantly bring a feeling to you. Movies can’t do that, coke — you can get that occasionally, but it goes away after the first or second hit. But a song isn’t going to harm you and give you a terrible hangover, but it can make you feel a certain way. Music is so powerful, and that’s why we’re here.”

The Reznor sessions were a little contentious — Farrell says Trent had to act as referee — but all sides agreed enough to generate a new song that’s still being finished called “Laughing Beats.” “When we were recording, I guess a couple of the guys were listening to Radiohead’s new song which has an odd jaggedness to it. That’s kind of attractive and interesting,” Farrell tells RS. “But at the same time, Jane’s Addiction is funky, and funky hits the one beat. We could do anything, but Magic Johnson said go with your strengths. So we started out with the idea of maybe write something with a jagged time signature, like 5/7 or something, but that doesn’t make your booty move. So we came to a middle ground. It ended up we weren’t very Radiohead. We ended up having to be Jane’s Addiction.”

There’s no question Jane’s Addiction were very Jane’s Addiction Thursday night in Austin, when they turned out a dramatic set stocked with songs from their first two studio albums. Despite their astonishing onstage chemistry, Farrell says his favorite moment of the night came around 5:30 a.m., when most fans, and his band, were long gone. “I looked around, everyone had left me and [his wife] Etty except for this kind of crazy girl, and she wanted me to sign her tit. And usually Etty is just like, fuck off, you know? But Etty was so numb to it, she goes, ‘Knock yourself out.’ I signed it pretty good.”

Related Stories:

Jane’s Addiction Rip Through Early Catalog at SXSW
Jane’s Addiction’s Trent Reznor-Produced Songs Debut on Free EP


Previous Next Latest

Comments

Ghostoftomwaits | 3/23/2009, 8:31 pm EST

Except for Perry Farrell the other members would have little to financially gain by releasing new material. That being said it would be great if they did release new stuff.

jj | 3/23/2009, 8:42 pm EST

So glad they are back!
Exciting times.

NINJA | 3/23/2009, 10:54 pm EST

they sound great!!! that night, hope to see some new stuff coming soon!!!! trent is the man.

5/8 | 3/24/2009, 1:26 am EST

ummm, i don’t think there’s such a thing as a 5/7 time signature. if they were trying to write a song with that signature i’m not surprised it didn’t work out. maybe he’s been signing a few too many tits…

paul | 3/24/2009, 3:46 am EST

there is indeed 5/7 time,very uncommon,but possible.

go | 3/24/2009, 1:50 pm EST

boring

Big Fan | 3/24/2009, 3:57 pm EST

I think it would be great if they casually over the next year just record singles that they had a connection with. As he said they are older and the writing process has changed, i don’t see any rush to put out a full album just yet.

I say record a handful of songs over time, release them digitally each time, then when you get enough press a CD or LP. Thoughts?

Toots | 3/24/2009, 5:06 pm EST

Yea! I love Jane’s Addiction!!!! I can’t wait. Eric Avery is back too! Yes! For once, Reznor is doing some good work.

Anonymous | 3/24/2009, 5:54 pm EST

5/7 means that the measure has 5 beats and the 7th note gets the count. Since there is no such thing as a 7th note, 5/7 doesn’t exist.

GG | 3/24/2009, 5:54 pm EST

Trents a has-been. and so is Perry. This is the has-been tour of the a lifetime.

Big Fan | 3/24/2009, 6:27 pm EST

So who are the one’s we should be paying attention to? Who, in your opinion, are the ones that are “right now” and are relevant?

Anonymous | 3/24/2009, 10:17 pm EST

im sure im in the extreme minority, but i’d be more interest in a Porno For Pyros reunion.

Steve | 3/24/2009, 11:14 pm EST

Perry I think it’s time for a new JA album..last one you made I had no pubic hair…I am not sure where your fan base is .

Jon | 3/25/2009, 1:08 am EST

gotta concur w/ the guy below.. i always liked porno 4 pyros better..

The Intl | 3/25/2009, 1:47 am EST

Let’s see, Jane’s Addiction, Nine Inch Nails – why not add Red Hot Chili Peppers & make it a trifecta of mediocrity?

. | 3/25/2009, 2:49 am EST

Lame. Perry acting like a 14-year-old with orgasm talk. Anyone with a brain is so over this drug-addled pseudo-spiritual flake and his band of has-beens and reality TV stars.
At least he’s trying to write new material, un like the last 12 reunions, which consisted of a lazy retread of “Jane Says” and its atrocious steel drums.

Santa Fean | 3/25/2009, 8:51 am EST

Red Hot Chili Peppers…I dunno…I thought their last CDs were excellent. Nice to see the old stoners/drunks performing sober. Remember Led Zepp when in the 70’s and they sucked live because they were drunk?

PrattMcClain | 3/25/2009, 10:48 am EST

Enough of this guy. He should be dead.

thrashee | 3/25/2009, 12:54 pm EST

Why all the hate for Jane’s? If you’re over the 20-something mark, you just might appreciate this band for what it was, and consider a reunion with the original line up a blessing, It’s fine if you don’t like their music, but comments like they’re nothing but has-beens are remarkably naive and smack of the self-absorption of the younger generation.

PHOENIXAMAZON | 3/25/2009, 1:00 pm EST

What are you people high NIN is not a has been. Put down what ever crack pipe that you are smoking. This tour is all ready selling out across the country. In this economy that it a big. Considering the pit tickets are over a 100$.

ferabad | 3/25/2009, 3:00 pm EST

NIN and Jane’s Addiction are better than any band born in the last 15 years. I wish that there were more “has been” people with talent these days instead of the crap that probably some of the posters below consider current good music.

Anonymous | 3/25/2009, 3:37 pm EST

The SXSW gig was their fourth gig. Not their third, since getting back together (not counting the NME performance) I was at the first three, so I know. Just sayin’.

Matty.G | 3/26/2009, 7:46 am EST

Not only does it show how amazing JA and NIN are that they’re still relevant but its a blight on the majority of bands over the past 15 years that none have had the influence and talent to even push these bands.

I’m not even a huge JA fan but the last album ’strays’ was awesome!

NIN are just legends!

SOULCRAFT | 4/1/2009, 6:35 pm EST

I truly hope that Jane’s creates new and invigorating music. I love their body of work, but it gets tiring listening to the same songs over and over. I hope that with Mr. Avery on bass again, the boys will create songs that make me feel like “Three Days” did 19 years ago!

Amityville Whore | 4/8/2009, 8:23 pm EST

no drugs …no inspiration!

callum hardy | 11/14/2009, 4:00 pm EST

hard work isnt it

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement