Previous Next Latest

Music Bloggers Say Google Is Deleting Posts Containing Music Without Warning

2/5/09, 12:48 pm EST

Is Google the new Web Sheriff? That’s the accusation coming from many music bloggers after archived posts started disappearing from their respective sites. L.A. Weekly talked to one blogger, Ryan Spaulding of Boston-based Ryan’s Smashing Life, who noticed that archived blog posts that featured copyright material were mysteriously vanishing. Spaulding talked to others in the blogging community that experienced a similar problem, and then they realized what they had in common: they were all using Google’s Blogger platform.

In the past, whenever Google had an issue with some copywritten material that was posted on one of their blogs, the company would send a letter of warning to the blog’s proprietor. Now, Spaulding and other bloggers say, Google is deleting pages without warning or notification. To make things worse, Spaudling says he wasn’t breaking the law or posting an entire album for the benefit of illegal downloaders. “I’d received the label’s press releases and followed their directions, spending my time and energy to promote their albums,” Spaulding told the LA Weekly. “By pulling down my post, they destroyed my intellectual creativity, the very same thing they’re erroneously accusing me of doing. Say someone had linked to that post, or [blog aggregator] Hype Machine — it’s gone completely. If I go into my Blogger table of contents, it’s gone. Not de-published — gone.”

“When we are notified of content that may violate our terms of service, including clear notices of alleged copyright infringement, we act quickly to review it, and our response may include removing allegedly infringing material,” a Google spokesperson told the paper, adding that nowhere in the fine print does it say that the company has to notify bloggers of deleted posts.

Google isn’t the only thing bloggers need to be worried about in 2009: L.A. Weekly reports that the U.K.-based Web Sheriff will also open an office here in the States soon, which means the next Animal Collective album will take even longer to leak.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

RETEP | 2/5/2009, 3:43 pm EST

Quite your complaining. Copyrighted material means just that, IT’S COPYRIGHTED!!! Just because you have a blog does entitle you to use this material however you want. People think just because they have internet access, you can do whatever you want. We prove over & over again that we can’t govern ourselves and what it’s going to lead to is oversight of internet. Do us all of favor, stop trying to bend whatever rules just because you think you can. In fact, can we do away with blogging altogether? This world’s already full of a@#holes, we don’t need to hear their opinions.

Muckracker | 2/5/2009, 3:59 pm EST

“This world’s already full of a@#holes, we don’t need to hear their opinions.”

The irony is delicious.

BGil | 2/5/2009, 4:17 pm EST

Um, RETEP, it sounds like you did not read the entire article. He claims that his WAS LEGAL. Aka, it probably contained less than 10% of a copyrighted piece, which would qualify as FAIR USE. Now I’m not saying that what he had posted actually WAS legal. I’m just saying that before you jump to conclusions you should consider what is said in the article, because it sounds as though you may have just skimmed it, and not actually taken in all the information that is presented.

Ivanov | 2/5/2009, 4:22 pm EST

Very original at you site and good idea. I think, that I shall come once again because I too am interested in this theme but while I do not have site. I hope for your help. ;) Thanks you. mr.Ivanov

Gaxoceettebop | 2/5/2009, 4:24 pm EST

Hello People,

I Just joined up and am trying edit my profile but i can’t see the button!! probably staring me in the face lol

thanks guys

Me | 2/6/2009, 3:06 pm EST

So Retep…is that your opinion?

muruch | 2/6/2009, 5:44 pm EST

I left Blogger after a four month battle with them over their deleting reviews from my 100% legal blog (I obtain permission for every mp3 I post) Muruch due to erroneous claims from IFPI. I had clear authorization from the record labels (who held the copyright of the recordings).

From what I understand, IFPI was acting on behalf of EMI, who use a bot to find any songs under their umbrella – which includes legal mp3s from American indie labels who just happen to use EMI as their UK distributor.

I was one of the few who successfully filed a counter claim and had my posts reinstated. The process was frightening considering the threat of legal action even though I’d followed copyright laws. Not to mention that the prolonged battle (and subsequent transfer to a new domain) drastically reduced my traffic, which has resulted in a great loss of ad revenue. Thanks to Blogger, my almost decade old music site has been reset in rankings as if it were a new blog. And despite their acknowledgement that the claims against me were unjustified, Blogger continues to censor blogs without verifying the claims they receive.

sickofmotion | 2/6/2009, 5:45 pm EST

I had my post taken down by google for posting a free song. Yup, not kidding. I posted that song that was freely given by the Decemberists some time ago, and they took that down. Morons.

BLOG? | 2/7/2009, 5:59 am EST

“Blog” is such a lame ass shitty term anyway. Retep is right.

Jake | 2/8/2009, 8:11 am EST

I’d like to know more about what rights music copyright holders retain and I’d like to see a better accounting of what was removed. If I’m supposed to be alarmed, then someone failed because this doesn’t come close. Slippery slopes and coming for the other guy, I know, but this is less than serious.

The Devil Has The Best Tuna | 2/8/2009, 8:12 am EST

Blogger doesn’t even bother to check the claim out it just removes the post giving carte blanche to malicious claims of copyright abuse. Guilty until proven innocent what a way to run a justice system. Ever read Kafka’s ‘The Trial’? Well Josef K would feel right at home in the first decade of the 21st century!

The Devil Has The Best Tuna blog fully understands the need to protect copyright, artists deserve the right to make a living from their labours and therefore any track that is posted on the blog is either posted with the permission of the artist, their management or an agent acting on their behalf or is directly linked from the artist or labels site and is therefore already freely available. The Devil’s mission in life is to promote new artists not to steal from them. But this doesn’t stop blogger from removing posts.

The right of appeal muruch refers to is long winded and quite frankly a bit of a pain in the backside for most bloggers for whom this is a hobby, and contacting blogger on anything is more difficult than turning yourself inside out in a bath of vinegar. Something tells me they don’t want too many people appealing.

Maybe it’s time for bloggers of the world to unite and takeover!

Flornearire | 4/17/2009, 1:34 am EST

nice, really nice!

Wltgxoun | 7/13/2009, 5:25 pm EST

MmaI8K

Rodeo Skunk | 10/15/2009, 11:33 am EST

I would stick to buying CD’s

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement