Previous Next Latest

Virgin/EMI Sue 30 Seconds to Mars for $30 Million, Leto Fights Back

8/18/08, 11:48 am EST

EMI may have found a new way to generate profits: suing their own artists. Virgin/EMI have slapped 30 Seconds to Mars with a $30 million suit for — depending on which side you talk to — breaching their contract (says Virgin/EMI) or legally terminating their contract (says 30STM’s Jared Leto.) After news of the suit hit, Leto issued a lengthy statement arguing that the band signed its contract with the label nine years ago, but according to California law (where the deal was inked), “one cannot be bound to a contract for more than seven years.” So the band, looking to take advantage of that loophole despite owing Virgin three more albums, is opting out due to some significant disagreements:

“If you think the fact that we have sold in excess of 2 million records and have never been paid a penny is pretty unbelievable, well, so do we,” Leto writes. “And the fact that EMI informed us that not only aren’t they going to pay us AT ALL but that we are still 1.4 million dollars in debt to them is even crazier.” Plus, there’s more, “like the new regime at EMI firing most of the people we know and love, wanting to place advertisements on our Website, EMI owning 100 percent of the masters of our record… forever, and basically having a revolving door of regimes at the company made it easy to not want to continue as is.”

An EMI spokesperson responded by saying, despite their success with 30STM, “We have been forced to take procedural, legal steps in order to protect EMI’s investment and rights during contract renegotiations initiated by the band and management. We hope to resolve these matters amicably and put them behind us so we can continue working in partnership with the band to take them to even greater levels of success.”


Previous Next Latest

Comments

Spela | 11/17/2008, 10:34 am EST

Why don’t we just start collecting money, like 1$ per person, and then send it to EMI like a charity donation … obviously the global financial crisis hit them and have to squeeze money out of any source possible.

LV | 10/28/2008, 2:35 am EST

I’m with Jared…he’s HOT!

melsy | 9/24/2008, 3:11 am EST

Thats not fair that emi wants to sue 30stm i reckon they just jealous of jareds fame and want his money any excuse will do

30stm shouldn’t have to pay 30million to some record company

m.t. | 9/1/2008, 11:34 pm EST

you know what!? 30 seconds to mars has the hottest guy ever and he has a good voice, so if you people want to sue him then do it and then they can turn into a Christian band and have more fans and make more millions than ever!!!! God bless you all who read this!

30stmsuprfan | 8/20/2008, 9:50 pm EST

i can’t belive that!!!
30stm is th bst band , hav the bst videos,songs and lyrics what hapen wiht EMI???
WE ARE WITH 30STM!!!
provehito in altum**

me | 8/20/2008, 6:15 am EST

on one side, i agree with AllStar, 30 STM may have not recouped the damn advance yet.

on other side, why don’t EMI just extend the goddamn contract for few more years and then they can chased 30 STM around to birth 3 more albums to recouped the album amount as promised and the $1.4 million money? aren’t those kind of stuff can be arranged? that way, they can keep the chaos to themselves.

but then again EMI is already on the edge of their apocalypse. fast money is always the opt ¬¬

loyal_30stm_fan | 8/19/2008, 1:14 pm EST

FUCK EMI!!!! they’re a bunch of assholes anyway!! I mean, why the heck would they need 30 million dollars, when they are already bathing in money! 30 seconds to Mars is absolutely a great & wonderful (and VERY good live) band!!

Art Freak | 8/19/2008, 11:20 am EST

30 million?????!!!!!
wat da..#$!^

Goddamn! KEEP STICKING IT 2 THE MAN JARED!

AllStar | 8/19/2008, 8:58 am EST

Has the World gone mad? EMI paid this band a massive advance. The band have not recouped this money for EMI so that is why they are yet to receive a royalty.

EMI is not a charity and it amazes me that these bands want a huge payment upfront yet when they fail to generate enough revenue for the record label throw their toys out of the pram and demand royalties.

All these people defending the band, i’d like to seem them lend a large amount of money to someone and see how they feel when it is not paid back to them.

Dan | 8/19/2008, 8:46 am EST

emi have lost it! they cant be serious!! anyone got a spare 30mil to help jared and the boys out?..me either

JD | 8/18/2008, 11:07 pm EST

It’s a good thing they didn’t call themselves 60 Seconds to Mars, or else they’d be sued for 60 million.

Anonymous | 8/18/2008, 5:01 pm EST

emi is lossing it.

Jim Talbot | 8/18/2008, 3:11 pm EST

corporate weasels will attempt to rape us all! Sign on the devil’s dotted line & see what happens.

fdo | 8/18/2008, 2:55 pm EST

next 3 records?
you are kidding rigth?

#3704-8B | 8/18/2008, 2:50 pm EST

FUCK THE MAN.

Kevin the Robot | 8/18/2008, 2:13 pm EST

I just hope they won’t go after Russell Crowe next. Then we’ll all be screwed.

pe | 8/18/2008, 2:06 pm EST

“…We hope to resolve these matters amicably and put them behind us so we can continue working in partnership with the band to take them to even greater levels of success.”

What reason for, to dupe them again?
So you Mars Guys beware of that machinery that serves only one purpose - money. Not sure if record companies really care about artistic license still…

math ? | 8/18/2008, 2:03 pm EST

If the band lost $1.4 million on two records and they have three left under their contract, wouldn’t the label just pay the band the $2.1 million they won’t be losing on the next three records instead of suing for $30 million?

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement