Previous Next Latest

Thousands Grab Girl Talk’s “Feed the Animals” For Free, Creating Doubts About Pay What You Want

7/8/08, 4:10 pm EST

Did Girl Talk make a mistake by using the pay-what-you-want method when releasing his new album Feed the Animals? That’s what the Los Angeles Times wonders in an article examining whether an indie artist can generate income using the same experimental release strategy first pioneered by Radiohead’s In Rainbows. While the sales numbers of Feed the Animals haven’t been revealed, Girl Talk and Illegal Art (the record’s label) admit that several thousands grabbed the album for free, that most people who bought the album paid $10, while the top “donation” was $50. People who paid money will receive a copy of the physical album in September, which will be the true test of how well an indie artist sells after giving away his album. Still, album sales never seemed to be an integral part of the Girl Talk’s success, as the mash-up master has seemingly gone from playing frat houses to festivals in the span of two years — his overhead is low, his touring costs are minimal and he’s not paying royalties on the 300+ samples he used for Feed the Animals. Still, the album serves as an interesting barometer and guinea pig to see if indie artists can exist outside the record label model as well as established acts like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

fakename311 | 7/11/2008, 5:27 am EST

I had never heard of Girl Talk, but an RS story made me go over and download it. I did for free, and really liked it, so I went back and paid the $10 for the CD.

Cheesecrop | 7/10/2008, 5:35 pm EST

I will be the first to admit I have no clue who Girl Talk is. There is a problem w/ using him as an example. Judging by what you said I am assuming this is a 1-man band situation. Question is, can a 4 or 5 piece touring band on the club circuit handle this kind of thing? It’s a whole different set of dynamics when you are dealing in this realm.

JP | 7/10/2008, 2:52 pm EST

Having heard one of the tracks of the Girl Talk album, free is overpaying for the album.

About pay-what-you-want method, it works better for an established artist than an unknown. However, if an unknown artist gives away his album, and it’s a good album. You will get people to buy future albums and attend your shows.

Jungleland | 7/10/2008, 9:16 am EST

Never heard of Girl Talk, so I would pay $0. If record sales are not their focus (and publicity is) then this worked, ’cause we are talking about them now…which is better than their music just being stolen from P2P sites

lou | 7/10/2008, 12:20 am EST

i think you have to be really good to use this model (hint hint)

Jb | 7/9/2008, 12:10 pm EST

I would pay for a new Avalanches album not Girl Talk

stupid Blackman | 7/9/2008, 11:06 am EST

u clearly don’t have an undrstanding of others ability to have an oppinion, laws or not.

Lasivian | 7/9/2008, 2:54 am EST

An excellent example of “Pay-what-you-want” is Stephen King’s serial novel “The Plant”.

He said he would keep writing if at least 75% of people paid what he asked for it. And they did. However he stopped writing it in the middle for some unknown reason.

If anything this caused the consumers to feel let down after they upheld their end of the bargain.

I think the industry is afraid to give up it’s demands for payment, wanting instead to enjoy it’s large profit margin, but in the end they have little choice.

Stacy Lambe | 7/8/2008, 11:10 pm EST

In the era of online mixtapes and the (surprise) success of mash-ups, it is no wonder that many grabbed the album for free.

unfortunately, girl talk (while admittedly awesome!) does not garner the same recognition or reverence that radiohead does.

despite the chance to get a free album, dedicated fans of radiohead are more likely to pay for original music. this is highly ironic, because unlike girl talk, radiohead has amassed a fortune and could afford to provide an exclusively-free LP (physical or digital).

blackman | 7/8/2008, 10:51 pm EST

u clearly don’t have an understanding of music or copyright law

whitman | 7/8/2008, 8:55 pm EST

so let me get this straight….

this is an artist that samples a ton of other artists, royalty free…then gives away his cd?

maybe he should take his profits and pay the artists who he has stolen from.

just a thought.

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement