The defense in the R. Kelly trial continued their assault against the prosecution’s case yesterday, calling to the stand witnesses that attempted to cast doubt on the prosecution’s key arguments. The defense called a private investigator who testified that Lisa Van Allen – the supposed third person in the threesome sex tape – and her fiancé attempted to extort money from Kelly by threatening to sign a $300,000 tell-all book deal. Kelly’s lawyers also attacked the prosecution’s argument that the man in the sex tape has a black mole on his back that identifies him as Kelly, calling to the stand a forensic video analyst who said the mole that appears on the video is actually just “an artifact of electronic noise.”
R. Kelly Defense Lawyers: That’s Not His Mole In That Sex Tape
6/6/08, 9:26 am EST
Comments
Jethro Bush | 6/9/2008, 12:27 am EST
He urinated on her on video. He’s more guilty than OJ.
China | 6/8/2008, 7:03 pm EST
i can’t wait for this to end and kellz can get on with his life..he’s not guilty.
Anonymous | 6/8/2008, 7:02 pm EST
i can’t wait for this to end and kellz can get on with his life..he’s not guilty.
Laibish Husenffefer | 6/7/2008, 3:24 am EST
I think it sounds like Kelly has some very good, high-priced legal help which usually spells, ‘not guilty’!
Kwame Opam | 6/6/2008, 3:00 pm EST
…seriously? Take a step back and listen to how that sounds to you…

Email
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!


- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2008 All Media Guide, LLC.