Previous Next Latest

Peter Travers Video Review: “Cloverfield,” “Mad Money” and “27 Dresses”

1/17/08, 6:13 pm EST

According to Peter Travers, there is only one cinematic offering opening this weekend that’s even worth vague consideration. Is it the madcap heist Mad Money, the romantic comedy 27 Dresses or the low-fi monster movie Cloverfield? Click above to watch the full reviews, and read Travers’ review of Cloverfield here.

>> Watch every episode of our weekly Peter Travers video podcast by subscribing via iTunes (when prompted, click “Launch application”). Every Friday, a new episode will be delivered to your iTunes. [If you don’t have iTunes, download it here.]

[Video: Jennifer Hsu]


Previous Next Latest

Comments

samira madden | 1/18/2008, 12:05 pm EST

WHen is the movie alvin and the chip munksn ciming to theaters

Musicman | 1/19/2008, 1:52 am EST

I have to totally agree. I saw the Host a couple of months ago and just today saw Cloverfield, everything Peter Travers said was true…Except, I thought he was a little harsh on the acting. The thing about The Host was that the director was able to set up for that realistic feel, the actors did not have much of a chance for this in Cloverfield. Overall, an O.K. but not great movie.

Mark Woodford | 1/20/2008, 10:02 am EST

Peter’s review was spot on! I went to see this movie after months of anticipation and was ambivilent about how I felt about what I had seen until I saw Peter’s reviw. My expectations for the film were high but the movie fell fat on the soul of the characters. The intital party had me wanting to pull my tongue out through my nose! How long did they want to show how airheaded the cast really was. If not for the monsters in this flick then it would be an complete waste of time and money.

mary w | 4/4/2008, 9:26 pm EST

It was soooo dissaponiting to see my dear Stones hooking up with Bill….One thing that I admired them for was the lack of main stream political agenda. I guess that they joined all these cliches that we see around, and it is almost heart-breaking. I wonder whose idea was this. As they are, they definetely didn’t need Bill to improve their ratings, why did they allow to be used in this political race? Why, Mick? Why, Keith? This is the first time that I am not going to buy your DVD…

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement