Previous Next Latest

Despite Police Tour, Concerts, Like CDs, Experience 2007 Decline

12/26/07, 12:15 pm EST

Like much of the music industry, North American ticket sales suffered a drop this year, as the top twenty tours of 2007 generated only $996 million, the worst numbers since 2004. Despite the Police reunion tour — the year’s top-earner with $131 million, which makes it the fourth highest-grossing in history — totals still were down 15.6 percent from last year’s gross. Kenny Chesney and Justin Timberlake tours made $71.1 and $70.6 million, respectively, to take second and third place. While four acts sold more than one million concert tickets in ‘06, only the Police and Chesney surpassed that total in 2007.

The concert circuit was no doubt hurt by the Hannah Montana Ticketmaster scandal, as well as the fact that the top six best-selling albums of 2007 were all released in 2006, which affected promotional tours. Perennial chart toppers the Rolling Stones also took a year off to tour Europe. Fingers are being pointed at the Dave Matthews Band and Bruce Springsteen, who both set out on fan-friendly tours that saw them price tickets at lower average prices. Still, the numbers would have been better if the number five tour, the Van Halen jaunt with David Lee Roth back at the mike, had started at its original kick-off point in the summer of 2007. Because of its late start (due to Eddie Van Halen’s rehab stint), the majority of its shows will bleed over into 2008. With Van Halen still getting along a mere five days ’til New Year’s, and a possible Led Zeppelin tour on the horizon, 2008 looks to be a stronger year for the concert biz.

Related Stories:


Previous Next Latest

Comments

KC | 1/10/2008, 10:47 am EST

This is stupid. They base all the figures on big arena tours. How about the fact that club shows are where people are going? I went to two arena tours this year…MCR and Velvet Revolver. Definitely prefer the club atmosphere and the ticket prices. I got a better show for $10 from Madina Lake in a venue that held 1500 than I did for $50 to see VR and Alice in Chains in an arena.

Or how about festivals? How many people when to Coachella to see “Rage” or Projekt Revolution for Linkin Park? I know I went to both days of Bamboozle for My Chem’, Muse and Taking Back Sunday along with a whole lot more. Warped Tour?

Arena shows are people who have way too much money to burn or are willing to go into hock to sit in the nosebleed section. I’ll pay my $25 and be at the barrier.

SVUF | 1/4/2008, 10:31 am EST

The main problem is that concert ticket prices are too expensive for people to afford regardless of seat location in a stadium. Also there aren’t many groups and/or singers worth seeing.

robert | 1/2/2008, 6:03 pm EST

anyway genesis did the best tour and the most successful in europe..and that’s what counts

Greg | 12/30/2007, 1:07 pm EST

Another thing that’s hurting ticket sales are brokers like Top Tickets who are basically crooks, they sell seats online to a credit card holder, then inform them that those seats weren’t actually available, but then offer similar seats at around twice the price, AND they now have all your credit card info. They’re truly a dishonest company, I’d know, I worked there for about 5 months.

rhonda | 12/29/2007, 7:41 am EST

I think the BEST and probably most successful (read: SATISFYING - esp. if you happen to be the artist?) tours were the ones that didn’t assume too much (the “I’m God, afterall” phenom), and played to a ton of small venues versus only a few ridiculously priced mega-shows. Best example: Chris Cornell. Although his cd sales were probably disappointing, I caught 2 of his shows - both at sold-out smaller clubs, and they were no doubt the BEST shows I’ve seen in over 20 years.

davidk | 12/28/2007, 8:53 pm EST

the photographer got a great shot of their double chins

anonymous is right | 12/28/2007, 12:12 am EST

you guys are ridiculous. Give it up.

"The Man" | 12/27/2007, 11:33 am EST

Don’t blame me for your lame attempts at trying to hide your insecurities!

enots gnilolr | 12/27/2007, 11:20 am EST

well, back in the 60’s everyone was high; even then we didn’t appreciate being cursed at.

anonymous is right | 12/27/2007, 4:36 am EST

after all, somebody’s got to fight the man.

-

Back in the 60s Rolling Stone might have understood that.

enots gnilolr | 12/26/2007, 10:02 pm EST

re: look, team | 12/26/2007, 2:24 pm EST

“I know it’s great fun to bash this site . . .”

It won’t be so fun once we start “bashing” back!

Helvis II | 12/26/2007, 6:35 pm EST

re: hmmm | 12/26/2007, 3:32 pm EST

“for someone who does’nt like rolling stone, “anonymous” returns on a daily basis to rant, cry, bitch, and boo-hoo his prissy little attitude. if he does’nt like it, go elsewhere, crybaby!”

Sounds just like someone I know!

Anonymous | 12/26/2007, 6:32 pm EST

RE: Anonymous | 12/26/2007, 2:19 pm EST

“Fuck Rolling Stone for selling out and catering to all these fools.
Fuck Rolling Stone for backing all these”

Right Back Atcha!

Marty P. | 12/26/2007, 4:12 pm EST

Saw Van Halen 3 times. They were awesome!!! Great show. Worth every penny.

Scrooge | 12/26/2007, 3:53 pm EST

Kenny Chesney and Justin Timberlake can kiss my ass.

hmmm | 12/26/2007, 3:32 pm EST

for someone who does’nt like rolling stone, “anonymous” returns on a daily basis to rant, cry, bitch, and boo-hoo his prissy little attitude. if he does’nt like it, go elsewhere, crybaby!

Anonymous | 12/26/2007, 2:29 pm EST

I’m sorry, but if rolling stone isn’t countering such ignorant attacks on “fan firendly tickets”, then in my mind they ARE endorsing those very attacks by remaining silent. They are supposed to be commentators on the music industry after all. Problem is, they are too afraid of offending anybody they don’t have to balss to stand up and do the right thing.

look, team | 12/26/2007, 2:24 pm EST

I know it’s great fun to bash this site, but this story REPORTS that people are saying “fan-friendlY” ticket prices affected year-end totals. They’re not ENDORCING that take.

Anonymous | 12/26/2007, 2:19 pm EST

wait…is rolling stone giving artist a hrad time for fan friendly concerts and ticket prices? Are you guys seriusly more concerned with the total gross revenue of concerts than artists showing some respect for their fans?

Isn’t that who the shows are for, the fans? The point should not be
to get rich, but to share music with other people. Quite frankly, I hope the music industry continues its suicidal implosion. Only after it hits rock bottom will music be reborn with musicians who care about making music and not making money. There are surely still those bands out there (radiohead leads the list) who put the music first, but most (at least the ones on radio/ mtv/ rolling stone) fall into this greedy category.

Fuck the major labels.
Fuck the radio staions for being bought by the labels.
Fuck the artist willing to sell themselves out for $.
Fuck the ignorant masses who eat up whatever crap happens to be shoved down their that day.
Fuck Rolling Stone for selling out and catering to all these fools.
Fuck Rolling Stone for backing all these

Steve | 12/26/2007, 2:00 pm EST

Wow, we’re finger pointing and demonizing artists for being “fan friendly”? You know, because we all needed one more reason to stop supporting these greedy assholes.

And since when is $110+ (after all the fees for Bruce tix) “Fan-friendly”?

I’m trying to think of any other industry outside of music that is more disconnected from the reality of its consumers, but I’m not thinking of anything except our government.

Fan Friendly | 12/26/2007, 12:37 pm EST

The worst tickets for Springsteen are still $95 without adding in all the garbage ticketmaster fees and taxes. That isnt fan friendly at all. The touring industry, like the rest of the music industry is just a bunch of assholes

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement