Previous Next Latest

The Phil Spector Trial: We Watch Court TV So You Don’t Have To

9/6/07, 9:36 am EST


WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY?
Finally, after four and a half months of testimony, closing arguments began in the murder trial of famed producer Phil Spector. First up: the prosecution. Deputy DA Alan Jackson started things off by hypothetically putting the jurors in the House of Blues parking lot the night Spector coaxed Lana Clarkson to come back to his castle in Alhambra. With a CCTV video still of Clarkson and Spector in the parking lot on the projection screen, Jackson asked the jury what they would tell Clarkson if they were there, in that parking lot, on that night. Jackson speaks unanimously on behalf of the jury when he cups his hands around his mouth and whispers, “Don’t go.” These are the heartstrings that Jackson would play with throughout his closing argument, which lasted the entire day and left no defense rock unturned. With the help of a perfectly synched PowerPoint presentation, Jackson broke down the Spector defense team step by step, calling Spector’s collection of high-powered lawyers and big time witnesses “a checkbook defense.”

At the onset, a jaw-dropping moment: Jackson played the call chauffeur Adriano de Souza made to police after Spector came stumbling out his house, gun in right hand, and proclaimed, “I think I shot somebody.” That phrase is repeated often throughout the series of phone calls that the police fielded that night, all while Spector was back in his mansion washing his hands, tidying up the crime scene, dabbing Clarkson’s face with toilet water, and positioning the gun just so that it looks like a suicide, he argued.
Next, Jackson eviscerated the testimony from Clarkson’s so-called friends Punkin Pie and Jennifer Hayes-Riedl so surgically that it’s hard to believe either woman will want to leave their house tomorrow. He painted both women as liars who stated under oath that they were so close to Lana that they talked to her three or four times a day, yet records showed neither made or received a phone call or e-mail to or from Clarkson in the four months prior to her death.

Jackson returned to the defense’s suicide theory, arguing that Clarkson wasn’t depressed, and even if she was, it wasn’t nearly to the magnitude Pie and others claimed. Besides, Jackson reasons, depressed people don’t commit suicide; clinically depressed people who are mentally sick with depression commit suicide, not people who just have a bad day. They don’t, in the case of Clarkson, sling a purse over their shoulder, sit in a chair closest to the door, and abstain from writing a goodbye note or calling a loved one, even though the phone was mere feet away. As Jackson argued: The defense will have you believe Clarkson entered Spector’s house, seamlessly found a gun that was hidden in Spector’s drawer, loaded up on Spector’s bullets and, unbeknownst to Spector, shot herself.

By lunchtime, the first half of Jackson’s closing argument was so damaging to the defense that Spector’s new lawyer Dennis Riordan grabbed at five miniscule legal straws in an effort to have the case be called a mistrial. Judge Fidler denied the motion for a mistrial, but asked Jackson to tone down the editorializing.

Following the recess, Jackson came back firing by referencing the five women the prosecution brought to the stand to testify that, in a similar situation, Spector pointed guns at them as well. Near the end of his closing argument, Jackson contended that instead of telling de Souza that “I think I killed somebody,” Spector in fact should have said “I think I finally killed somebody.”
Later, Jackson attacks each of the defense’s witnesses one by one, focusing on the easy target, Dr. Vincent DiMaio, and closing on Dr. Michael Baden. Jackson tells the jury how the defense tried to blindside the prosecution with Baden’s “non-transected spine” revelation, but in the end, Baden’s epiphany is nothing more than a “Hail Mary pass that gets dropped in the end zone.” After all the controversy, Jackson muffled the Baden-fueled cacophony with a simple football reference.

For his closing act, Jackson screened a montage of Clarkson in multiple roles throughout her career. The video, soundtracked by Steely Dan’s “Peg,” casted Clarkson as a happy, hard-working actress, and not the suicidal failure presented by the Spector defense team.

IS THIS GOOD OR BAD FOR SPECTOR?
Jackson was so masterful and effective, only a miracle on par with Moses parting the sea can save Spector from being convicted (or twelve jurors who believe in the phrase “celebrity justice”).

TODAY IN COURT:
Lawyer Linda Kenney-Baden will single-handedly present the defense’s argument, despite missing three essential weeks of testimony due to a viral infection. With the resignation of Bruce Cutler still echoing in the courtroom, it falls on Kenney-Baden to at least try to undo the damage Jackson did to her client’s case. The defense’s closing arguments are expected to last the majority of the day, after which the prosecution’s brief rebuttal closing arguments will take place. All in all, Judge Fidler told the jury he expects the trial be put in their hands at some point on Friday.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

CC | 9/6/2007, 1:49 pm EST

It must suck to be a defense attorney trying to trump truth with lies in order to set a killer free and command a bigger fee from your next gig defending a killer client.

Jean Roberts | 9/6/2007, 4:04 pm EST

If Lana Clarkson killed herself, it
was most likely because she suddenly
realized what lousy, shifty-eyed,
bucket-seated, maudlin ol’ harpified
liers’ her very, very “dear friends”
are.

Rev. Peter Anderson | 9/6/2007, 4:42 pm EST

I know for a FACT that Lana Clarkson was in NO WAY suicidal in any way, shape or form. She had numerous things “in the works” and, in fact, was wanting to “get married, raise a family and make people laugh” as she revealed to me in private counseling sessions. The defense allegation that she was “depressed, down on her luck, and suicidal” is COMPLETELY untrue!

annelouise | 9/6/2007, 7:14 pm EST

The Defense today seemed weak. I know that I feel he is guilty, lets hope the jury does too.

Jon | 9/6/2007, 9:59 pm EST

I love Spector’s music. It’s a real shame how he tarneshed such a beautiful backlog of songs. I still think he’ll appeal on the grounds that his defense team did not represent him properly in court.

Also, it’s pretty crazy how the producer of the song “Imagine” shot someone dead and the songwriter of “Imagine” was shot dead. Ironic.

Bukowski | 9/6/2007, 10:08 pm EST

He’s gonna walk, you watch!

CC | 9/7/2007, 2:31 am EST

Alan Jackson was first rate! Hopefully, justice will be served!

Andy Gump | 9/7/2007, 10:50 am EST

I hope that little weasel gets convicted, finally. He’s been cruisin’ for a bruisin’ for 50 years.

Megan Stone | 9/7/2007, 1:19 pm EST

Let’s just imagine for a minute that Phil Spector was an ordinary guy, earning an ordinary salary. He would have been arrested the night Lana Clarkson died, and remanded for trial. No bail – ordinary guys can’t afford it. After sitting in an overcrowded jail for months, he would either have copped a plea to a lesser charge or gone to trial. Based on the evidence, he would have been convicted in a heartbeat. End of story. Celebrity justice sucks.

GeneSnake7s | 9/7/2007, 2:16 pm EST

Crusin’ for brusin’? Jeez! Tell Fonzie I said hello.

GeneSnake7s | 9/7/2007, 2:19 pm EST

Crusin’ for a Brusin’? Jeez. Tell Fonzie I said hello.

Hey Music Lover | 9/7/2007, 7:29 pm EST

When’s Rolling Sotne gonna post a gallery with all of Spector’s different hairdos and outfits?

samantha | 9/8/2007, 2:45 am EST

Closing arguments are finished and the case goes to the jury on Monday after Judge Fidler’s instructions. Judge Fidler has been a prosecution buddy from day one, but I think he and the DAs were trumped by the facts. There is no evidence Spector killed Clarkson. Even the prosecution’s own witnesses said they could not tell who fired the gun. Not guilty. Reasonable doubt.

Record Producer | 9/8/2007, 3:34 pm EST

An acquittal! An acquittal! My kingdom for an acquittal!!!

samantha | 9/9/2007, 6:43 am EST

Phil Spector didn’t kill this woman. The clothes he was wearing prove he didn’t shoot her. He had no blood or tissue on his shirt, slacks, shoes, socks. DA Jackson said Phil’s jacket sleeves were “baggy” because the jacket was too big for him. Why no blood or tissue on these too long baggy sleeves if he fired the gun?

The prosecution’s theory that he was standing to her side doesn’t jive with the bullet trajectory straight to the center of her throat. He would have to be a contortionist.

Record Producer | 9/9/2007, 8:27 am EST

Give me your tired and your poor hostess yearning for actress work and I will blow her head off with my sex pistol. (There was backspatter blood on my jacket.)

coltran45 | 9/9/2007, 8:42 pm EST

Prosecutor Alan Jackson has sold the Jury, The People of California the Media and the rest of the world a fallacy, misrepresentatin and incomplete story of Lana Clarkson- with Prosecutor Alan Jackson’s closing argument – his “Lana don’t go scene.”

Why didn’t Prosecutor Alan Jackson go further back in time with his “Lana Don’t Go scene” to just prior to the time when Lana left her home on Christmas Eve in 2001 to go to a party where Lana “accidentally” broke both her wrists before she ever knew Phil Spector.

With Alan Jackson distorting the facts in this way to the Jury (and everyone else) by not taking his Lana don’t go scene further back in time – we forget that everyone should have been shouting “Lana don’t go.. Lana Don’t Go ” in 2001,
and also shouting

“Lana don’t drink not Tequila…or you may have a great fall!” – and she did just this breaking both her own wrists on Christmas Eve 2001 “accidentally”- and a year prior to Lana going home to Spector’s house in 2003 in the middle of the night where she drank and had another accident. She’d had an accident in 2001 where she broke both her wrists, why isn’t it an accident this time? Should we rely on Puppet of the State DeSouza’s testimony who is motivated to get his Green Card?

CC | 9/11/2007, 7:19 pm EST

Lana Clarkson would be alive today if she had not accepted Spector’s invitation for a nightcap at his house. If she had known his history of gun violence/cruelty against women who rebuffed his sexual advances would she have gone? No. Did she kill herself? No.

Coltran45 | 9/17/2007, 6:48 pm EST

Lana Clarkson would have lived if she had not gone home with a stranger at 2.am in a black slip. She also would have lived if she didn’t have a propensity for accidents and risk taking and perhaps fooling around with guns. I don’t know for sure about the latter as I wasn’t there but she was certainly accident prone and a risk taker.

If she had known of Phils history of gun violence and those women who rebuffed his sexual advances would she have gone?

Well first of all Lana may not have rebuffed Phil’s sexual advances, there is evidence to show that.

In addition if you are going to rebuff Phil’s sexual advances – why go home with a stranger at 2 am in the morning in a black sexy slip?

Did she kill herself? Don’t know! However the Scientific Evidence tends to look that way. And the 99 per cent statistical evidence for in the mouth gun shots seem to point to suicide, and the lack of blood on Phil’s jacket tends to point to suicide.

CC | 9/19/2007, 1:56 am EST

Unfortunately the Neanderthals are still among us who don’t understand that no means no. These developmental retards think it is alright to club a woman or pull a gun on her to force her to comply with their one-sided wishes. Developing some lovable qualities is not an option. Therefore, it is much better that these throwbacks to the stone age practice safe sex and make themselves at home – alone. If they don’t, they are likely to find themselves the defendants in criminal trials and involved in protracted litigation, when not serving time in prison.

Jane Hansen | 9/19/2007, 6:27 am EST

Here’s the deal: if you are rich, famous and a man in Los Angeles then you can kill ANYONE ANYTIME and you will not be convicted no matter how obvious is is you did it. Just ask OJ Simpson, Robert Blake or Phil Spector. Where do they find the total retards that get on these juries?

Kim | 9/26/2007, 2:48 pm EST

“In addition if you are going to rebuff Phil’s sexual advances – why go home with a stranger at 2 am in the morning in a black sexy slip?”

I think we all know she must of given him a blowjob as the DNA has proved {saliva}.
Whether he paid her,she was forced who knows.
But considering where she was found dead,what she was wearing,Phil’s history of not letting {or attempting} to force people to stay by threatening them with guns it points that she was forced to stay.
She had bruises on both her wrists,as if she struggled {expert claimed}.
She didn’t want to stay any longer.
She was on her way OUT.
She had her coat,purse on.
Your logic seems to be implying {sic} that if a woman is dressed sexy she “was asking for it”.
You here this pathetic defense in many rape cases. Come on!
Besides Major Midget Spector might of wanted her to change into something sexy.She went right from work to his place if I’m correct.
So…
If it was proper attire for The House Of Blues job as hostess she had it’s most likely their wasn’t anything wrong with what she was wearing.

Kim | 9/26/2007, 2:51 pm EST

“You here ”

Really should edit myself before posting.I of course meant “hear”

Wrecking Crew, CIM,Chino,CA | 9/27/2007, 10:05 pm EST

Philly-Lookin foward to your visit here!
Me and the boys are anxious to play “keep away” with yo scrawny butt.
xoxo

ME | 9/28/2007, 4:59 am EST

Dear Prosecutors-you did a great job but one thing you missed-what was the real difference between the five woman who testified but were not shot and Lana. None of them physically resisted. One said she used a stern tone of voice. One picked up a phone. One went up stairs with him. None of them grabbed or tried to push the gun away. Lana did, she had a bruise on her right wrist from his left hand while standing in front of her and she had residue on both hands trying to push the gun away. She resisted and he pulled the trigger. No one else fought back not even Leonard Cohen, look at his story too. Lennon said to him I need my hearing. No one had ever tried to touch the gun. Explain that to the jury next time.

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement