Previous Next Latest

First Clip From Bob Dylan Biopic Hits the Web

7/16/07, 9:05 am EST

The first clip from the highly anticipated Todd Haynes-directed Bob Dylan biopic I’m Not There has surfaced on YouTube. The black-and-white footage depicts the first meeting between a young Dylan (portrayed here by actress Cate Blanchett) and beat poet Allen Ginsberg (played by comedian David Cross). As we reported last fall, Blanchett is just one of six actors who will channel their inner Bob Dylans to tell the singer/songwriter’s story — Richard Gere, Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Marcus Carl Franklin and Ben Whishaw will also play the role. In the leaked scene, Blanchett’s Dylan-esque hair, sunglasses and gruff voice help make her convincing, but there’s no hiding those feminine cheekbones. I’m Not There is slated to hit theaters September 21.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

jay z is a bum | 7/16/2007, 10:02 am EST

and so so is Cate Blanchett. granted Bob Dylan is considered a legend but wtf? the scene is just stupid. who really enjoyed that scene?

Ghost Mutt | 7/16/2007, 10:50 am EST

I actually couldn’t watch until the end it was so stupid. There’s nothing worse than squares being into something you love; like finding out that guy you hate at work loves all the same bands as you

Cate is a genius | 7/16/2007, 10:58 am EST

Cate Blanchette is a genius, i felt the thrill of the Ginsberg meeting

Bangers-N-Mash | 7/16/2007, 11:00 am EST

Who knows if this scene will even be used in the film… I’m just as excited as all hell for the film… it’s not going to be just another stale bio-pic

Anonymous | 7/16/2007, 11:35 am EST

I can’t wait for this movie.

See you later Allen Ginsberg | 7/16/2007, 11:57 am EST

Hah, I wonder how many other little references are slipped into the script. “See You Later Allen Ginsberg”, for those sad enough to not be familiar with the complete basement tapes, is a recurring line in a tongue-in-cheek jam from those sessions.

robbie k | 7/16/2007, 12:01 pm EST

who is supposed to be Lennon in that? no good.

Dickie | 7/16/2007, 12:24 pm EST

Maybe you’re square too, Ghost Mutt.

bab | 7/16/2007, 12:40 pm EST

That is not Lennon. But a fairly convincing Dylan, especially by the opposite sex.

Ragman | 7/16/2007, 12:57 pm EST

Blanchet has D down pat. The ghost of electricity howls in the bones of her face.

RenoDavid | 7/16/2007, 1:14 pm EST

Gruff voice? Sounds like dylan would sound after sucking some helium…

Voicedude | 7/16/2007, 1:19 pm EST

The critics may dig this film, and I may dig this film, but the ticket buying public is going to hate it. This is too eclectic and experimental for a straightforward bio-pic like “Ray” or “Walk The Line”, and audiences will not show up. Dylan deserves a better bio-pic.

Don’t laugh, but I think Adam Sandler (alone) could have made a Dylan bio-pic into a popular and respected film. He’s been looking for the right dramatic vehicle – plus he plays guitar, has a reedy & nasal voice, and did you see his haircut in “Reign Over Me”? He looks just LIKE Dylan!

Alex | 7/16/2007, 1:37 pm EST

Voicedude, as you so, err, cleverly call yourself:

Have you seen the whole movie? Let me stop you there: no, you haven’t, nobody has yet. It wasn’t ready for Cannes and, per my understanding, isn’t even finished yet. It seems highly presumptuous to claim that Dylan deserves a “better” biopic, when you can’t say with any certainty how good this one is.

What I DO know is this: Todd Haynes is an amazing filmmaker. And I personally could do without another streamlined, conventional biopic. “Ray” and “Walk the Line” are competent, respectable, modestly enjoyable efforts that say little to nothing particularly relevant about the men they portray. “I’m Not There” looks like a genuine attempt to understand and dissect the Dylan mythos, and paint a picture of the man and artist that’s as complicated as his vast body of work. You want a straightforward version of his life, seek out one of the several documentaries that have been made about him.

Will audiences stay away? Probably, but what bearing does that have on the quality of this experiment? Me, I’m going to give it a shot.

Anyway Voicedude (it hurts me even writing that misnomer of a moniker), if you do indeed end up “digging” it, who cares what everybody else thinks? Just wondering.

Beatles Lover | 7/16/2007, 1:38 pm EST

I can’t believe they have a girl playing Bob Dylan! She may look a bit like him with the glasses and stuff, but you can tell by the voice; it’s definately not a guy – and the cheeks are girly.

Beatles Lover | 7/16/2007, 1:42 pm EST

John Lennon is supposed to be the guy who says ‘Do you suffer from sore eyes, groovy forehead, or curly hair? Take Zimdon!’ I’ve seen the actual video this is based off, with the real Bob Dylan and John Lennon in it, onn YouTube. You can tell Bob’s plaed by a girl, the cheeks are too high, and the hands are definately a girls. If it had a better portrayal of Dylan, I would maybe see this. But come on, I mean, a girl playing Bob Dylan? Get real.

Tom | 7/16/2007, 1:47 pm EST

Are you kidding me Hollywood? A girl playing Bob Dylan, wtf is this world coming to?

kyguy | 7/16/2007, 2:37 pm EST

It’s actually pretty remarkable how much this matches footage from “Don’t Look Back.” The speed-laced hand movements and face rubbing are right on. This will either be great of awful, either way I’m buying a ticket.

Stuporfly | 7/16/2007, 2:48 pm EST

Why is David Cross playing Rick Rubin?

Gutta | 7/16/2007, 3:04 pm EST

This is absolute trash. When are people going to realize that no one will ever be able to play dylan. And to top it all off, cate blanchett?? Am i the only one who see’s this as a piece of trash from a pop headed director who wants to jam something down our throats? Plus we already know this film sucks becuase if it worth anything other than my shit, a better director would have done it.

Anonymous | 7/16/2007, 3:10 pm EST

This movie should be musically somewhere between Rick Springfield in ‘Hard To Hold’ and Lea Thompson in ‘Howard The Duck’. How exciting!!

Vashon | 7/16/2007, 3:19 pm EST

If any of you had been around for the beginning of the Dylan era you would know that is a joke being played out…seems like you all bought it, pro or con. man

J | 7/16/2007, 3:30 pm EST

I can’t believe some of you people. So what if it’s a girl? They’re really not trying to hide it. It’s called “I’m Not There” and there are 6 (or 7) different people playing 6 (or 7) different sides to Bob Dylan. It’s not that hard to grasp. Don’t bother watching it if you’re expecting crap like Ray or Walk the Line.

Drew | 7/16/2007, 3:51 pm EST

CB looks like a good Dylan. But if that was supposed to be Lennon, then someone totally screwed up. Did he even have a British accent???

Arlo J. Wiley | 7/16/2007, 4:28 pm EST

I’ve been really looking forward to this flick…but that clip was just awful. I seriously can’t think of anything good about it.

And that was supposed to be John Lennon?! What?!

The Wench | 7/16/2007, 4:40 pm EST

Bea Arthur is a serial killer.

kyguy | 7/16/2007, 5:14 pm EST

I’m pretty sure that was not supposed to be John Lennon.

dylan bores me | 7/16/2007, 6:24 pm EST

he really does

urbanhick | 7/16/2007, 6:32 pm EST

it don’t matter wot you think .. that’s the point ..

Persian Drunkard | 7/16/2007, 7:10 pm EST

Dylan knew Ginsberg way before 1966, how could they screw that up so bad

****** | 7/16/2007, 8:13 pm EST

did you people watch the clip? they say it’s Allen Ginsberg probably 3 times. i really don’t see how someone could think it was John Lennon.

Garry Templeton | 7/16/2007, 8:39 pm EST

You could totally tell that was a woman. Why did they do this sort of casting?

Joe Puma | 7/16/2007, 10:22 pm EST

Cate Blanchett is a great actress but COME ON!Look for Wynona Ryder as the Boss in Born To Run:The Bruce Springsteen Story at a theatre near you.

auramac | 7/16/2007, 11:11 pm EST

That was horrendous. She is much to feminine to play even the most asexual, effeminate of characters- in fact, any man. They also had Ginsberg’s looks down but that’s about it. And I figured that was Alan price of the Animals, not John lennon being portrayed. I’m tired of the idea, started by the great Dylan himself with “Renaldo and Clara”- of different actors or singers in the same piece playing Bob Dylan.

Anonymous | 7/16/2007, 11:16 pm EST

This BOB dylan and
Zeitgeist movie
interesting stuff to see.

hh | 7/17/2007, 6:12 am EST

That was fuckin horrible

Ghost Mutt | 7/17/2007, 6:43 am EST

Well, well…..I’m not…so there “Dickie”

Quinn | 7/17/2007, 6:56 am EST

you people are all f***ing idiots!

The Greek | 7/17/2007, 7:37 am EST

Next: Metallica’s James Hetfield played by an 12 year old Vietnamese. Just kidding, I think the Bylan biopic sounds interesting.

Anonymous | 7/17/2007, 11:33 am EST

i really thought todd haynes wouldnt make dylan into a charicature in this film, but i guess i should have seen this coming seeing his work on velvet goldmine… what the fuck was dylan thinking approving this… hopefully christian bale can atleast make this worthwhile… he better be the bornagain dylan i love

Raymond. | 7/17/2007, 6:22 pm EST

That was dissapointing. Cate Blanchett is a gifted actress, but it’s almost unheard of to cast a female in a lead male part in modern cinema. It works better in theatre, where the aesthetic and acting properties are much less centered around reality and more grounded in fantasy. It looks like she can barely breathe trying to convince us that she’s Bob Dylan. Her dialogue is hushed and barely audible, not in the least convincing. Though her appearence is a little convincing, so I’m sure this part could pass as a cool cameo in the finished movie. I’m baffled though, as to why they couldn’t have leaked a scene with Heath Ledger or Christian Bale, both of which seem like compelling and convincing choices to portray Dylan.

ramblinon | 7/19/2007, 3:42 pm EST

Huh?

Dan | 7/21/2007, 12:28 am EST

That’s not supposed to be John Lennon, it’s Bobby Neuworth who was Dylan’s tour manager/hanger-on in the mid-60’s.

pot hound | 7/21/2007, 2:02 pm EST

Dylan w/tits! Too bad we couldn’t have at least seen them.

dane cook sucks and you know i | 7/21/2007, 5:22 pm EST

I’m glad that dylan is so confident with his own work that he only wants people doing nutty stuff like this.

why would anyone want to see some actor try to be dylan in a formulaic “biopic”?

this movie, regardless if it’s good or bad, is part of dylan’s art.

good for him

Anonymous | 7/21/2007, 11:56 pm EST

Zeitgeist movie

Tom O'Rourke | 7/22/2007, 8:25 am EST

There seems to be a constant scourge at what Dylan was and is, Dylan isn’t worried at this and so it should be. The luminaries of popular ‘culture’ seem to thing that by presenting such work to the general public in order to entertain they might spark a verbal conflict between the ‘Faux Dylanites’ and the ‘Dylanists’ I see them laughing all the way to thier safety deposit boxes, bless thier little stone cold hearts.
Dylan is in you and without Dylan there is no conflict, Dyla has become commoditised, branded, shelved and institutionalised by all who claim to beautify him. Dylan is Dylan and yet he is Zimmerman in Dylan clothing, beware all who cry Dylan!
Peace, Love, Freedom
Tom O’Rourke

dlight | 7/26/2007, 5:34 pm EST

I’m pretty sure the worst part of this scene is not Cate Blanchett but the girl who says, “Oh my god! It is!”

The Grubby 1 | 8/10/2007, 1:38 pm EST

Has anyone mentioned that John Lennon is being portrayed in this scene as well!?

MW | 8/14/2007, 1:30 pm EST

This movie looks interesting.I hope it gets a wide release,I’d love to see it.

calls | 9/27/2007, 7:02 am EST

lets call me just free

static | 10/12/2007, 9:48 pm EST

crazy static

roulette | 10/15/2007, 3:09 pm EST

just play it … roulette

boots | 12/8/2007, 2:35 am EST

you are found ugg boots

boots | 12/8/2007, 2:35 am EST

you are found ugg boots

bloussant | 12/11/2007, 1:51 am EST

bloussant bloussant bloussant

bloussant | 12/11/2007, 1:51 am EST

bloussant bloussant bloussant

teeny | 5/15/2008, 8:01 pm EST

teeny

casinos | 5/21/2008, 6:07 pm EST

casinos

casinos | 5/21/2008, 6:07 pm EST

casinos

casinos | 5/21/2008, 6:07 pm EST

casinos

kubis | 5/23/2008, 5:27 am EST

kubis

shinedown | 5/25/2008, 2:12 am EST

shinedown

industrial | 5/26/2008, 11:56 pm EST

industrial

industrial | 5/26/2008, 11:56 pm EST

industrial

industrial | 5/26/2008, 11:56 pm EST

industrial

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement