Previous Next Latest

Amazon’s New Online Music Store Will Be Huge

5/16/07, 5:22 pm EST

Amazon's New Music Store, iTunes, Apple, EMIAmazon.com’s announcement that it will sell unprotected MP3s through an online digital music store later this year could have huge implications for the future of the record industry. The addition of parts of EMI Music’s storied catalog — a bundle that includes blockbuster titles like the Beastie Boys, Coldplay and hundreds of others — means the new store could establish itself as a legitimate competitor to Apple Computer’s dominant iTunes Music Store. Yes, iTunes will always be the easiest conduit for loading music onto an iPod, but Amazon offers the vision of physical, hand-delivered CDs side-by-side with online songs. And the store’s unprotected MP3 format means downloads will play on iPods, Zunes and others.

“We’re making a very strategic move that we think will allow us to create a better consumer experience with digital music and boost the digital marketplace,” says EMI spokesperson Jeanne Meyer, although she stops short of declaring the store significant competition for iTunes.

Of course, for the Amazon store to grow into a retail force, it needs two things — catalog and reasonable prices. Although they promise “millions of songs” from 12,000 record labels, Amazon’s spokespeople won’t give any details about which labels, other than EMI, will be involved. They also wouldn’t comment on pricing or when the store will open, other than later this year. The presence of EMI, which announced last month it would sell unprotected MP3s via iTunes at higher-than-usual sound quality, is a big head start. But until larger major labels Universal, Sony BMG and Warner Music include their own music catalogs in MP3 format — and they’ve shown no intention of doing so — the Amazon store has very little chance of catching on with consumers.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

merik | 9/2/2007, 2:03 pm EST

hello world!

zune is second place | 5/17/2007, 6:37 pm EST

the zune has about 1/9th the market share last report i saw about half a month ago. With the upcoming solid state versions and new wifi features on the way (hotspots for wifi connection to music store and more p2p features), they seem to be in a good spot to meet apples features. The music store content is the biggest weakness right now. Although the subscription business model really made a lot of people happy.

Bon Jivo | 5/17/2007, 1:24 pm EST

This article’s headline is “Amazon’s New Online Music Store Will Be Huge” ending with “the Amazon store has very little chance of catching on with consumers.” Huh? Well written piece indeed! Waste of a read.

Don Vito | 5/17/2007, 12:58 pm EST

Tim is a douche!! Congrats on being the biggest douche bag in history

Scenic Anemia | 5/17/2007, 11:30 am EST

People do realize that with a subscription download service (Urge, Napster, Yahoo, etc.) and a free program called FairUse4WM you can download anything you want and use it on any device you want for $5 - $10/month, right? And if you cancel the subscription you don’t lose the songs. With that little discovery I quit caring about who sells what for how much in what format a long long time ago.

B | 5/17/2007, 10:57 am EST

It would be nice if you guys did some fact checking before writing your stories. But I can see you have no problem correcting your errors without even taking responsibility.

Tim | 5/17/2007, 9:12 am EST

I don’t really care, but congratulations on the worst graphic I have ever seen. Who came up with the swordfighting logos? Terrible. Just terrible.

billg | 5/17/2007, 1:28 am EST

Don’t count out MS. They never get it right out of the box, but by version 3, look out. Embrace and extend, baby…

Anonymous | 5/16/2007, 10:41 pm EST

wasnt the zune supposed to be a big compeditor for apple too?

Anonymous | 5/16/2007, 10:36 pm EST

can you download pete wentz songs?

ned | 5/16/2007, 7:18 pm EST

yawn. a downloadable music store with only one label is not a store, its a press release. ping me when they’ve got all the majors.

j | 5/16/2007, 6:51 pm EST

This is great news. I don’t mind the low sample rate as long as I can put the songs I download onto my player, cd, or whatever without having to buy the whole album.

Some of you may remember the “cassingle” and those were mean’t to be kind of disposable like this single downloading, in my opinion.

I say if you want to save an album or song for posterity you should go into a store and pony up for an actual cd.

Brix | 5/16/2007, 6:12 pm EST

I don’t care about the protection as much as the quality. Are they going to offer higher quality bit rate downloads? This is the only flaw with iTunes. 128’s don’t cut it!

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement