King Kong
Starring: Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody, Andy Serkis, Jamie Bell
Directed by: Peter Jackson
2005 Universal Pictures Action
(Posted: Dec 8, 2005)
Your Turn
Review 1 of 24
jbailey writes:
King Kong is movie making at its finest. A modern marvel of films clocking in at about 3 hours. The Lord of the Rings were sometimes brutal to sit through but King Kong won't disappoint. Director Peter Jackson made a great choose when casting Jack Black. This broadened Black's film agenda even wider. When watching the movie you really feel like you're in 1933. Everything from the cars to the buildings to the wardrobe. A movie you could watch over and over again. It feels like three different movies as well. The beginning, middle, and end all have different motifs story-lines. If you haven't seen it yet go see it on blu-ray disc.
Aug 11, 2007 06:31:16
Review 2 of 24
67super writes:
cartoonish;implausible; he is chewed on by three t rexes to no effect ,the guys harpoon doubles him over in pain,how many faces can watts make,her jaw musta hurt for weeks,even the second kong was better,jack black cant hold the the original guys jock.he is running full tilt w/her in his paw being slammed to the ground to no effect.the dawn of digital effects has ruined movie making and story telling
Dec 26, 2006 15:50:55
Review 3 of 24
poserhater writes:
This stupid movie is bloated and overdone in every sense of the word. The first third in NY is OK, but we know what's going to happen, so they didn't need to drag it out so much. Every shot in every scene of the middle third on the island is so ridiculously excessive I wanted to yell at the screen "Enough for Christ's sake!" I think I counted 1,374 close-up shots of ugly fucking native island people. That's about 1,370 too many. Once they enter the jungle, the whole movie becomes a video game. Watts would be dead in five minutes between the incessant shots of Kong slinging her back and forth, to the T-Rexes, to the giant bugs, to the giant bats, to the... It never fucking ends! The team of retards from the ship that are trying to find her are even more painful to watch. The scene where they're galloping along under the feet of wall-to-wall dinosaurs in the chasm was so ridiculous I couldn't believe they left it in the movie. All the while there's some ungodly pointless relationship between some kid and another member of the crew that begged to be omitted. About the time of the third excrutiatingly long bug battle scene I wanted to kill myself. Even the scenes that start out exciting are beaten until there's nothing left but quivering pulp. Jackson couldn't just have Kong fight a T-Rex. It had to be two, in the jungle, then on some vines, then in a gorge, then on the ground again... Christ. A movie about a giant monkey is hard enough to believe, but for ugly ass honker nose goon boy Adrien Brody to survive the limitless perils of the island is just insane. They never bother to show how the hell they managed to haul Kong's fat ass on to the ship either. The final act back in NY is by far the best, although by that time I'd had my fill of Kong and just wanted the stupid ape to die. I was just glad that Jackson showed an ounce of restraint and didn't have Kong being attacked by 3,000 airplanes while he's atop the ESB. Jack Black is way out of his depth. Having him try to utter lines as dopey as "Twas beauty killed the beast," was just retarded. After Kong plopped to his death, Black should have ran up and yelled, "Yeah, Sonic fuckin' Death Monkey!"
Aug 9, 2006 13:20:30
Review 4 of 24
erik06 writes:
"heart-stopping movie epic we've been waiting for all year"? Is Peter Travers shitting me? I couldn't wait to turn this one off.
Every scene felt unrealistic...and I'm not even talking about the dinosaurs and big gorilla - that part I can accept. What I can't accept are exaggerated, over-drawn, and outlandish action scenes. It was all too much for me.
I ended up walking out of the room half way through the movie. It ranks up there with Herbie and Dukes of Hazard for worst movies of 2005.
May 25, 2006 10:30:19
Review 5 of 24
xxAshleyxx writes:
this film is out-dated, way past its expirey date.you would need to be a die hard fan to enjoy this film. amazing special affects but both acting and story line un-satisfactory and just plain boring.
May 9, 2006 12:07:37
Review 6 of 24
case0914 writes:
Peter Jackson's King Kong is one of the greatest movie-going experiences of my life. It's more than just perfect; it's a visual and cinematic treasure that will live on for generations. Kong is back, and boy is he back all right.
Peter Jackson reminds us that he is a genius. He gives us more spectacles and thrills in three hours then most movies do in a lifetime. But Jackson never loses focus on character and story development. He is the heir to the throne of Steven Spielberg, in being the next great film director of time.
The Lord of the Rings trilogy is one of my favorite films of all time. So, when entering King Kong, I expected the world from Jackson, and he delivered the galaxy.
Jackson starts off with a view of New York City during the Great Depression. It then tells the story of the lying, cheating, and stealing Carl Denham, (the surprisingly creepy Jack Black) a washed-out film director with nothing left to do but to break the rules in hope of a shot at the big time. Fortunately, for him, he discovers a map. This map is the key in shooting his next picture. It is known as Skull Island, where the fate of him and dozens of others will be revealed.
Carl finds Ann Darrow (an Oscar-caliber performance from Naomi Watts), a struggling actress who is looking for stardom. She agrees on the picture but is tricked by Carl saying that the picture will be shot in China. Many of the crew members are unaware of this, as well as playwright/screenwriter Jack Driscoll, who is unwillingly taken on board because he was unable to get off the ship before it set sail.
Kong and Skull Island is not revealed until an hour into the picture. Jackson wants Kong’s presence and first look to be shocking and powerful. And is it ever.
When Skull Island is reached, things start to unfold. Jackson has created the scariest place on earth, with zombies, monsters, dinosaurs, and of course, Kong himself. Its as if hell has been sprouted onto earth.
After meeting natives on the island, Ann is soon captured by them and will soon be sacrificed to Kong. But when Kong sees Ann, he sees beauty; beauty he has never seen before. Ann, scared out of her mind, starts to dance for him to calm him down. We see Kong smile. From this moment, Ann and Kong begin to develop a mysterious and confusing attraction, in which neither one of them understands. Jackson does not use dialogue. He uses emotion. Staring into one another’s eyes, Ann and Kong realize that they are restricted from one another because the world cannot socially accept this.
When Carl’s camera is destroyed, he thinks his career is over. Suddenly, he believes he can take Kong back to New York City, where the world can give him the praise and honor he thinks he so humbly deserves. Carl tricks Ann and Jack (who is in love with Ann) to bring Kong back to the city, where the climax unfolds.
Jackson stays true to the 1933 original and its story. The 2005 King Kong is not just an action-adventure. I mean, of course, it is an action adventure. It is probably the greatest action ever put on screen. But, it is also a touching story of love between Ann Darrow and Kong. There love is forbidden and Jackson creates a powerful experience. I can admit: I laughed-I cried.
King Kong is the best movie of the year and it proves to us that Peter Jackson is one of the greatest directors of all time. Beauty has killed the beast. I am that beast.
May 2, 2006 17:21:43
Review 7 of 24
bradsnobar writes:
I liked this movie. Jack Black did a great job in a difficult role. The other actors seemed to deliver. The giant ape seemed to be somewhat portrayed as a toddler that had grown up without a mother -- basically a brat that gets to do whatever he wants, because no one is going to get in his way.
May 1, 2006 14:29:40
Review 8 of 24
ottoreck writes:
Real disappointment. Jack Back was way over the top
Apr 7, 2006 15:30:20
Previous Next
Advertisement
More Movie Reviews
-
3.5of 4 Stars
-
2of 4 Stars
-
3of 4 Stars
-
4of 4 Stars
-
2.5of 4 Stars
Advertisement
Email
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!



- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2008 All Media Guide, LLC.