To save Social Security, Bush wants to destroy it — replacing government-guaranteed retirement benefits with private accounts that will be subject to the whims of the stock market. It's an expensive plan. Allowing workers to divert even a small portion of their payroll taxes into private investments, as Bush is proposing, would require the government to borrow at least $2 trillion to make up the immediate shortfall. It's also completely unnecessary, according to Paul Krugman, a prize-winning professor of economics at Princeton University. In a blistering series of columns in the New York Times, Krugman has marshaled the economic data to show that Social Security is not only solvent, it's in much better financial shape than the rest of the federal government. "The people who hustled America into a tax cut to eliminate an imaginary budget surplus and a war to eliminate imaginary weapons," Krugman wrote recently, "are now trying another bum's rush."
At his tree-shaded home in Princeton, New Jersey, Krugman took a break from working on a new economics textbook to explain why the crisis is phony — and what's wrong with Bush's plan "to convert Social Security into a giant 401(k)."
What would you say to college students and young workers
who are convinced they'll never see a dime of the money they put
into Social Security?
You've been sold a scare story. Right now Social Security has a
large and growing trust fund — a surplus that has been
collected to pay for the surge in benefits we'll experience when
the baby boomers start to retire. If you're twenty now, you'll be
hitting retirement around 2052. That's the year the Congressional
Budget Office says the trust fund will run out. In fact, many
economists say it may never run out. If the economy continues to
grow at an average rate, the trust fund could quite possibly last
forever.
But what happens if it doesn't?
Even if the trust fund does run out, Social Security will still be
able to pay eighty percent of promised benefits. The actual
shortfall would be a pretty small part of the federal budget, quite
easily made up from other sources. Once the whole baby-boomer
generation is into the retirement pool, Social Security's share of
the gross domestic product will only increase by about two percent.
Well, President Bush's tax cuts are more than two percent of GDP
— and they're happening right now, not fifty years from now.
So the idea that there's this Social Security thing that is a huge
problem is just wrong.
But if the trust fund does run out, the government would
have to raise taxes or cut benefits, or some combination of both,
to keep Social Security solvent.
Yes, if the trust fund is ever depleted, then something will have
to be done. But you need to have some perspective on the
seriousness of this whole thing. On the day the trust fund is
exhausted, Social Security revenue will cover about eighty percent
of the cost of benefits. Right now — today — if you
look at the U.S. government outside of Social Security, revenue
covers only about sixty-eight percent of total government spending.
So on the day the trust fund is exhausted, forty-seven years from
now, Social Security will be in better financial shape than the
rest of the U.S. government is today.
Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.