Like any good American citizen, young Han wanted to cast his ballot
in the presidential primaries. So in October, the sophomore at
Hamilton College walked into the office of the county election
board in Utica, New York, to register to vote. Han couldn't make it
back to his home state of Washington to participate in its caucuses
-- they were being held in February, the same week Hamilton
requires sophomores to declare a major -- so he decided to vote in
the state where he actually lives.
But at the election office, a county official told Han that
only "permanent residents" may register to vote. College students,
she informed the clean-cut twenty-year-old, must vote where their
parents live. "This is just how we've always done it," county
election commissioner Patricia DiSpirito told Rolling Stone. "A
dorm is not a permanent residence -- it just isn't."
In fact, DiSpirito is flat-out wrong. Federal and state courts
have clearly established that students have the right to vote where
they go to school, even if they live in a dorm. But interviews with
college students, civil-rights attorneys, political strategists and
legal experts reveal that election officials all over the country
are erecting illegal barriers to keep young voters from casting
ballots. From New Hampshire to California, officials have designed
complex questionnaires that prevent college students from
registering, hired high-powered attorneys to keep them off the
rolls, shut down polling places on campuses and even threatened to
arrest and imprison young voters. Much as local registrars in the
South once used poll taxes and literacy tests to deny the vote to
black citizens, some county election officials now employ an
intimidating mix of legal bullying and added paperwork to prevent
civic-minded young people from casting ballots. "Students have been
singled out for outright discrimination," says Neal Rosenstein,
government-reform coordinator for the New York Public Interest
Research Group. "If someone was challenging the voting rights of a
military person who is stationed somewhere temporarily, we'd be
screaming that it's not patriotic. There shouldn't be any less of a
standard for students, who work and pay sales taxes in those
communities."
When congress passed the Twenty-sixth Amendment in 1971,
lowering the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen, 11 million new
voters gained access to democracy. But nothing in the new law
defined where they should vote. At first, most local election
officials assumed that students belonged with their parents. Then,
in 1979, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that students can vote where
they go to school, if that is where they establish residency.
Over the years, however, the court has refused to clarify what
constitutes residency for college students, leaving local election
officials to decide for themselves. As a result, the rules vary
wildly from zip code to zip code. Some registrars make it as easy
as possible, simply asking students what they consider their
primary address. Several states, including Pennsylvania, Texas and
Michigan, ban most added scrutiny as a form of illegal
discrimination.
But in recent years, many election officials have been
building a variety of hurdles to make it more difficult for
students to register and vote. In May 2002, the city council in
Saratoga Springs, New York, shut down a polling place at Skidmore
College, forcing students to travel off-campus to vote. That same
year, a judge in Arkansas tried to block 1,000 students at Ouachita
Baptist University and Henderson State University from casting
ballots, ruling that they must vote in their hometowns -- even
though the deadline for absentee ballots had already passed. And
when students from the University of New Hampshire showed up at the
polls on Election Day that year, poll workers handed them a
pamphlet warning them that voting locally could affect their
financial aid and taxes. The scare tactic worked: Many students
left without voting.
Refusing to register students is "a blatant form of
disenfranchisement," says Jennifer Weiser, who advocates for young
voters as associate counsel of the Brennan Center for Justice at
New York University. "It's clearly illegal."
In some cases, election officials simply don't seem to
understand the law. Jehmu Greene, president of Rock the Vote, was
surprised by the response when her group called state election
offices in Oregon and Washington about laws regarding student
voting: "They were clueless about the issue," says Greene.
In many cases, however, there's more than ignorance at work.
In small college towns, students often outnumber all other voters
combined -- raising fears that they could determine the outcome of
local elections. The colonial town of Williamsburg, Virginia, has
only 6,000 registered voters -- and 7,600 students at the College
of William and Mary. In January, when campus leaders began pushing
students to register and vote, the city responded by requiring
every student to fill out a two-page questionnaire detailing
everything from their personal finances to where their car is
registered. Of an estimated 150 students who completed
questionnaires, only four have been registered. "They don't want
students involved," says Rob Forrest, who quit school and moved off
campus so he could run for a seat on the city council. "It's a
cop-out to interpret the law like this -- and if the law says that
we're not supposed to get involved, then the law is wrong."
There's no way to tell how many college students are being
turned away by local election boards -- but observers say it could
be enough to re-elect George Bush this fall. Voters under the age
of twenty-four favored the Democrats by at least twenty percentage
points in each of the past three presidential elections, and polls
this year indicate that they favor John Kerry by as many as ten
points. If the race is as close as last time, keeping turnout down
among voters at one major college campus in each battleground state
could tip the election to the Republicans.
Students who are denied the right to register at college can
always opt to vote by absentee ballot -- but requiring voters to
plan ahead almost always reduces participation. "It is likely to
depress turnout, because it is a harder burden than just walking up
to a poll," says Curtis Gans, director of the Committee for the
Study of the American Electorate. What's more, some election
officials are also keeping students from the polls by making sure
the polls are hard to get to. At Northwestern, Sacramento State and
the State University of New York at Oswego, voting registrars have
resisted demands to set up polling places on campus. "This is an
intentional act of disenfranchisement," says the Rev. Jesse
Jackson. "Students don't just have the right to vote -- they have
the right to vote where they live."
Perhaps the most blatant attempt to intimidate young voters
took place at Prairie View A&M University in Texas. The school
is the last place one would expect a battle over voting rights:
Twenty-five years ago, when black students at A&M were denied
the vote by white county officials, the Supreme Court issued its
landmark ruling affirming that students can cast ballots where they
go to school. But in November, District Attorney Oliver Kitzman
published an open letter in a local newspaper accusing unnamed
citizens of "feigned residency." Kitzman warned that any "illegal
voting" would lead to a ten-year prison sentence and a $10,000
fine.
Students fought back. On Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday,
1,500 students marched through the Texas town in protest, and Rock
the Vote held a rally on February 23rd with Q-Tip from A Tribe
Called Quest. "Students have to pay for food and shop in the town,
so I think they should have some say in how it's run," Q-Tip says.
The next day, under pressure from state and federal authorities,
Kitzman settled a voting-rights lawsuit filed by A&M students
and issued a public apology.
But despite the victory in Prairie View, some observers worry
that the widespread discrimination will sour students on the
political process for years to come. "Students complain to me all
the time that county officials are thwarting their attempts to get
involved," says Donna Brazile, who managed Al Gore's presidential
campaign in 2000. "These kids are new to civic engagement.
Students, who are often taking part in democracy for the first
time, should be given every possible opportunity to vote. Instead,
they face all these barriers."
Even students who manage to register may find themselves
unable to vote in November. Under the new Help America Vote Act,
voters must now present valid identification when they show up at
the polls -- another obstacle for students whose driver's licenses
often reflect their old addresses.
But many students may not even get far enough to deal with the
new law. In New York, after a professor at Hamilton College called
election officials on behalf of Young Han, they finally agreed to
let him register. So Han resubmitted his application. But a week
later, he received another rejection letter, stating that students
are encouraged to "vote from their home county."
"It seems ridiculous that someone would have to go through all
this just to register and take part in the political process," Han
says. "Everyone talks about how young people don't get involved --
but maybe it's because they make it this difficult."
Illustration by Edward Sorel
Advertisement
More Politics
Advertisement
Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.