Why the Goldman/Facebook Deal Sucks


Good friend Nomi Prins wrote at length about why the Goldman/Facebook deal is a total loser for anyone even considering getting in. The whole piece is here but the bullet points are as follows. One, although the Facebook deal has often been called a rehashing of the '90s dot-com mania (even I made that comparison), Nomi says it's more like the CDO-subprime deals, where the game was "get the business, rake in the fees—and pawn off the overpriced goods on the clients." She notes that investors are down 10% in fees and services before kickoff on this one, and that anyone who gets in is locked in until 2013, while Goldman can get out at any time, "without notice to the fund or investors in the fund."

For Goldman to get into such a transparently skanky deal after all it's been through PR-wise in recent years says a lot about the level of self-knowledge, or lack thereof, of the people who run the company. Anyway, Nomi's piece is a very good read for people who want to understand the Facebook scam better.

Taibblog Main Next

blog comments powered by Disqus
Around the Web
Powered By ZergNet


Matt Taibbi

Matt Taibbi is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone. He’s the author of five books and a winner of the National Magazine Award for commentary. Please direct all media requests to taibbimedia@yahoo.com.

Daily Newsletter

Get the latest RS news in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the Rolling Stone newsletter and special offers from RS and its
marketing partners.


We may use your e-mail address to send you the newsletter and offers that may interest you, on behalf of Rolling Stone and its partners. For more information please read our Privacy Policy.