I was reading Thomas Friedman’s column on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan this morning and came across this passage:
The Pakistani ruling bargain is set by the Pakistani Army and says: “We let you civilians pretend to rule, but we will actually call all the key shots, we will consume nearly 25 percent of the state budget and we will justify all of this as necessary for Pakistan to confront its real security challenge: India and its occupation of Kashmir. Looking for Bin Laden became a side-business for Pakistan’s military to generate U.S. aid.”
When I read this, I thought, “That’s funny. Isn’t that about the same percentage of overall spending taken up by the U.S. military?” It turns out that the number here in the States is actually closer to 20 percent, although I’m sure that it would creep higher if they added in non-DOD military spending. Readers with expertise in this area, help me out?
More Music
-

November 10, 8:00 EST
Learning to Love Occupy Wall Street -

October 26, 8:00 EDT
Rick Perry: The Best Little Whore in Texas
-

February 16, 9:00 EST
Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail? -

October 12, 8:00 EDT
Advice to Wall Street Protesters
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Matt Taibbi is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone. He’s the author of five books, most recently The Great Derangement and Griftopia, and a winner of the National Magazine Award for commentary.
Taibblog
-

- February 17, 9:40 AM ET
-

- February 14, 4:55 PM ET
-

- February 9, 12:58 PM ET
-

- February 8, 11:02 AM ET
-

- January 28, 12:07 PM ET
- More Posts »
Stay Connected






loading comments...
COMMENTS
Read More