Advertisement
We were driving down Sunset Boulevard — Christmastime in L.A. — looking for a place to eat, when Bob Dylan noticed Santa Claus, surrounded by hundreds of stuffed, Day-Glo animals, standing and soliciting on the street. "Santa Claus in the desert," he commented disconcertedly, "it really brings you down."
A few minutes later, we passed a billboard which showed a photo of George Burns pointing to a new album by John Denver and praising it to the skies. "Did you see that movie they appeared in together?" Dylan asked me. "I sort of like George Burns. What was he playing?"
"I saw it on the plane coming out here. He played God," I said.
"That's a helluva role," Dylan replied.
Bob Dylan should know. For years be has been worshiped--and deservedly so. His songs are miracles, his ways mysterious and unfathomable. In words and music, he has reawakened, and thereby altered, our experience of the world. In statement ("He not busy being born is busy dying") and in image ("My dreams are made of iron and steel/With a big bouquet of roses hanging down/From the heavens to the ground") he has kept alive the idea of the poet and artist as vates — the visionary eye of the body politic — while keeping himself open to a conception of art that embraces and respects equally Charles Baudelaire and Charley Patton, Arthur Rimbaud and Smokey Robinson.
"Mystery is an essential element in any work of art," says the director Luis Bunuel in a recent New Yorker profile by Penelope Gilliatt. "It's usually lacking in film, which should be the most mysterious of all. Most filmmakers are careful not to perturb us by opening the windows of the screen onto their world of poetry. Cinema is a marvelous weapon when it is handled by a free spirit. Of all the means of expression, it is the one that is most like the human imagination. What's the good of it if it apes everything conformist and sentimental in us? It's a curious thing that film can create such moments of compressed ritual. The raising of the everyday to the dramatic."
Advertisement
I happened to read these words during my flight to Los Angeles — having just finished watching the "conventional and sentimental" in-flight movie — hardly knowing then that, just a day later, I would be seeing a film that perfectly embodied Bunuel's notion of the possibilities of cinema.
Renaldo and Clara — an audacious and remarkable four-hour movie that will open in New York and Los Angeles on January 25th and soon thereafter in cities around the country — is Bob Dylan's second film. His first, Eat the Document, was a kind of antidocumentary, a night journey through the disjointed landscapes of Dylan's and the Band's 1966 world tour, a magic swirling ship of jump cuts, "ready for to fade." It was a fascinating work, but it came and went after only a few showings.
To remain on a given level, no matter how exalted, is a sin, a spiritual teacher once said. And just as it is impossible for Bob Dylan "to sing the same song the same way twice' — as he himself puts it — so his new film is a departure from 'Eat the Document,' as it announces the arrival of a visionary cinematic free spirit.
Conceived over a period of ten years, and edited down by Howard Alk and Dylan from 400 hours of footage, Renaldo and Clara was shot during the 1975-76 Rolling Thunder Revue, whose participants make up a cast that includes Bob Dylan (Renaldo), Sara Dylan (Clara), Joan Baez (the Woman in White), Ronnie Hawkins (Bob Dylan), Ronee Blakley (Mrs. Dylan), Jack Elliott (Longheno de Castro), Bob Neuwirth (the Masked Tortilla), Allen Ginsberg (the Father), David Blue (David Blue) and Roger McGuinn (Roger McGuinn).
"Who Are You, Bob Dylan?" was the headline in the French newspaper read by Jean-Pierre Leaud in Jean-Lue Godard's "Masculin-Feminin". And the mystery of Renaldo and Clara is: "Who is Bob Dylan?" "Who is Renaldo?" and "What is the relationship between them?"
I decided to ask Bob Dylan himself.
"There's Renaldo," be told me, "there's a gug in white face singing on the stage and them there's Ronnie Hawkins playing Bob Dylan. Bob Dylan is listed in the credits as playing Renaldo, yet Ronnie Hawkins is listed as playing Bob Dylan."
"So Bob Dylan," I surmise, "may or may not be in the film."
"Exactly."
"But Bob Dylan made the film."
"Bob Dylan didn't make it. I made it."
"I is another," wrote Arthur Rimbaud, and this statement is certainly demonstrated by Renaldo and Clara, in which characters in masks and bats — often interchangeable — sit in restaurants and talk, disappear, reappear, exchange flowers, argue, visit cemetaries, play music, travel around in trains and vans and, in one exhilarating scene, dance around at the edge of a beautiful bay, where they join hands and begin singing an American Indian/ Hindu, Indian-sounding chant to the accompaniment of a bop-shoo-op-doo-wah-ditty chorus — a religion and rock & roll reunion.
To the anagogic eye, however, the film seems to be about just one man — who could pass for the Jack of Hearts, the leading actor of "Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts," a card among cards, an image among images — and just one woman. Together they find themselves in the grip of a series of romantic encounters that are reenactments of the Greal Mystery, culminating in the confrontation of the Woman in White (Joan Baez), Clara (Sara Dylan) and Renaldo (Bob Dylan) — a meeting at the border of myth and reality. Using his physical image and name as the raw material of the film, Bob Dylan — like the Renaissance kings of masque and spectacle — moves daringly and ambiguously between fiction, representation, identification and participation.
Renaldo and Clara, of course, is a film filled with magnificently shot and recorded concert footage of highly charged Dylan performances of songs like "It Ain't Me, Babe," "A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall," and "Knockin' on Heaven's Door" — the last of whose delicate and eerie instrumental breaks makes you feel as if you were entering the gates of paradise themselves. Avoiding all of the cinematic cliches of pounding-and-zooming television rock & roll specials, the cameras either subtly choregraph the songs — revealing structures and feelings — or else look at the white faced Dylan and the accompanying painted musicians in rapturous and intensely held close-ups.
Around these musical episodes Dylan has woven a series of multileveled and multileveled scenes — unconsciously echoing similar moments in films by Cocteau, Cassavetes and especially Jacques Rivette — each of which lights up and casts light on all the others. Scenes and characters duplicate and mirror each other, are disassociated and recombined — all of them, in the words of the director, "filled with reason but not with logic." Thus, when Clara (Sara Dylan) says to Renaldo: "I am free ... I can change," it brings back to us the words spoken earlier on by the Woman in White (Joan Baez) to Renaldo: "I haven't changed that much. Have you?" To which Renaldo replies: "Maybe."
And then there are the correspondences and the doubled worlds. The scenes in the bordello — with Joan Baez and Sara Dylan playing prostitutes and Allen Ginsberg playing a kind of Buddhist john — become an image of Vajra Hell — the Tantric Buddhist idea of the unbreakable, diamond bell. And a musician blocking someone's way backstage becomes the Guardian at the Gates.
What is most adventurous and mysterious about Renaldo and Clara, however, is the way it counterpoints music with action, lyrics with dialogue, songs with other songs. In one scene, for example, Rodeo (Sam Shepard) is trying to win over Clara, and on the soundtrack you hear, almost subliminally, what sounds like the chord progressions of "Oh, Sister," but which you later realize is "One Too Many Mornings" — as if the songs themselves were trying to communicate with each other, as if they were saying goodbye to each other:
You're right from your side,
I'm right from mine.
We're both just too many mornings
An' a thousand miles behind.
In another scene, members of the Rolling Thunder Revue join in a reception with members of the Tuscarora Indian tribe, while on the soundtrack we hear Dylan's haunting rehearsal tape version of "People Get Ready." And in finally another scene, Renaldo hurries nervously down a city street — panhandling and making some kind of furtive French connection with the Masked Tortilla (Bob Neuwirth) — to the accompaniment of Dylan's version of "Little Moses," above which we hear powerfully spoken lines from poet Anne Waldman's "Fast Speaking Woman" ("I'm the Druid Woman/I'm the Ibo Woman/I'm the Buddha Woman/I'm the Vibrato Woman").
"Your films make one wonder what's going on in people's minds," says Penelope Gilliatt to Buñuel, to which he responds: "Dreams, and also the most everyday questions: 'What time is it?' 'Do you want to eat?' "And, in spite of the compression and density of most of the scenes in Renaldo and Clara, there is also a presentational immediacy and clarity that fixes the scenes in one's mind — like a very special dream one wants to remember. . . .
"I expect this will be a very small film," Bunuel said during the shooting of his recent 'That Obscure Object of Desire' — which might have served as the title of Renaldo and Clara. "One needs just a hole to look out of," Bunuel continued, "like a spider that has spun its web and is remembering what the world outside was like. This hole is the secret of things. An artist can provide an essential margin of alertness."
Renaldo and Clara is a long film, but it is really intimate and evanescent. "Art is the perpetual motion of illusion," says Bob Dylan in the interview that follows — which took place a week before Christmas in L.A. "The highest purpose of art," Dylan continues, "is to inspire. What else can you do? What else can you do for anyone but inspire them?"
Advertisement
If someone asked me what Renaldo and Clara was
about, I'd say: art and life, identity and God — with lots of
encounters at bars restaurants, lucheonettes, cabarets and bus
stations.
Do you want to see it again? Would it be helpful for you to see it
again?
You think I'm too confused about the
film?
No, I don't think so at all. It isn't just about bus stations and
cabarets and stage music and identity — those are elements of
it. But it is mostly about identity — about everybody's
identity. More important, it's about Renaldo's identity, so we
superimpose our own vision on Renaldo: It's his vision and it's his
dream.
You know what the film is about? It begins with music — you see a guy in a mask [Bob Dylan], you can see through the mask he's wearing, and he's singing "When I Paint My Masterpiece." So right away you know there's an involvement with music. Music is confronting you.
So are lines like: "You can almost think that you're
seein' double."
Right. Also on a lyrical level. But you still don't really know...
and then you're getting off that, and there seems to be a tour.
You're hearing things and seeing people... it's not quite
like a tour, but there's some kind of energy like being on a tour.
There's a struggle, there's a reporter — who later appears in
the restaurant scenes.
All right, then it goes right to David Blue, who's playing pinball and who seems to be the narrator. He's Renaldo's narrator, he's Renaldo's scribe — he belongs to Renaldo.
Yet David Blue talks not about Renaldo but about Bob
Dylan and how he, David Blue, first met Dylan in Greenwich Village
in the late Fifties.
They seem to be the same person after a while. It's something you
can only feel but never really know. Any more than you can know
whether Willie Sutton pulled all those bank jobs. Any more than you
can know who killed Kennedy for sure.
And right away, David Blue says: "Well, what happened was that when I first left my parents' house. I bought The Myth of Sisyphus." Now, that wasn't really the book, but it was pretty close. It was actually — so he tells us — Existentialism and Human Emotions. So that's it: this film is a postexistentialist movie. We're in the postexistentialist period. What is it? That's what it is.
What could be more existentialist than playing pinball?
It's the perfect existentialist game.
It is. I've seen rows and rows of pinball players lined up like
ducks. It's a great equalizer.
What about the emotions in 'Existentialism and Human
Emotions'?
Human emotions are the great dictator — in this movie as in
all movies... I'll tell you what I think of the emotions later. But
getting back to David Blue: he's left his home, and right away
you're in for something like a triple dimension. Just ten minutes
into the movie he says: "I got in the bus, I went down to New York,
walked around for four hours, got back on the bus and went home."
And that is exactly what a lot of people are going to feel when
they walk into the movie theater: they got on the bus, walked
around for four hours and walked home.
There's another guy, later in the film, who walks out
into the night and says to a girl: "This has been a great
mistake."
Yeah. You can pick any line in a movie to sum up your feeling
about it. But don't forget you don't see that guy anymore after
that... He's gone. And that means Renaldo isn't being watched
anymore because he was watching Renaldo.
Talking about mistakes and seeing double: it's
fascinating how easy it is to mistake people in the film for one
another. I mistook you, for instance, for the guy driving the
carriage (maybe it was you); for Jack Elliott; and I even mistook
you for you.
The Masked Tortilla [Bob Neuwirth] is mistaken for Bob Dylan. Bob
Dylan is mistaken for Renaldo. And...Bob Dylan is the one with
the hat on. That's who Bob Dylan is — he's the one with
the hat on.
Almost every man in the film has a hat
on.
Right.
All those disguises and masks!
The first mask, as I said, is one you can see through. But they're
all masks. In the film, the mask is more important than the
face.
Advertisement
All the women in the film seem to turn into one person, too, and a lot of them wear hats. It reminds me of "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest":
He just stood there staring
At that big house as bright as any sun,
With four and twenty windows
And a woman's face in ev'ry one.
This film was made for you. [Laughing] Did you see the Woman in White who becomes a different Woman in White? One's mistaken for the other. At first she's only an idea of herself — you see her in the street, later in the carriage... I think the women in the movie are beautiful. They look like they've stepped out of a painting. They're vulnerable, but they're also strong-willed.
"Breaking just like a little girl."
That's the child in everyone. That's the child in everyone that has
to be confronted.
"Just Like a Woman" always seemed to me to he somehow
about being born. "I can't stay in here... I just can't fit." So by
confronting the child in you, saying goodbye to childhood, you're
born into something bigger... in a way it's a frightening
song.
It always was a frightening song, but that feeling needs to be
eliminated.
I was thinking of what looked like a Yiddish cabaret
filled with older women listening intently to Allen Ginsberg
reading passages from 'Kaddish,' his great elegy to his
mother.
Those women are strong in the sense that they know their own
identity. It's only the layer of what we're going to reveal in the
next film, because women are exploited like anyone else. They're
victims just like coal miners.
The poet Robert Bly has written about the image of the
Great Mother as a union of four force fields consisting of the
nurturing mother, like Isis (though your Isis seems more
ambiguous); the Death Mother (like the woman in "It's All Over Now,
Baby Blue"); the Ecstatic Mother (like the girl in "Spanish Harlem
Incident"); and the Stone Mother who drives you mad (like Sweet
Melinda who leaves you howling at the moon in "Just Like Tom
Thumb's Blues"). Traces of these women seem to he in this film as
well.
The Death Mother is represented in the film, but I don't know what
I should say or can say or shouldn't say about who is who in the
movie. I mean who is the old woman everyone calls Mamma — the
woman who sings, plays guitar and reads palms? She reads Allen's
palm, saying: "You've been married twice." And me, later on I'm
looking at the gravestone marked HUSBAND; Ginsberg asks: "Is that
going to happen to you?" And I say: "I want an unmarked grave." But
of course I'm saying this as Renaldo.
In 'Tarantula' you wrote your own epitaph:
Here lies Bob Dylankilled by a discarded Oedipus
who turned
around
to investigate a ghost
and discovered that
the ghost too was more than one person.
Yeah, way back then I was thinking of this film. I've had this picture in mind for a long time — years and years. Too many years... Renaldo is oppressed. He's oppressed because he's born. We don't really know who Renaldo is. We just know what he isn't. He isn't the Masked Tortilla. Renaldo is the one with the hat, but he's not wearing a hat. I'll tell you what this movie is: it's like life exactly, but not an imitation of it. It transcends life, and it's not like life.
That paradox is toppling me over me.
I'll tell you what my film is about; it's about naked alienation of
the inner self against the outer self-alienation taken to the
extreme. And it's about integrity. My next film is about obsession.
The hero is an arsonist... but he's not really a hero.
Renaldo and Clara seems to me to he about
obsession, too.
That's true, but only in the way it applies to integrity.
The idea of integrity comes across in a lot of your
songs and in lines like: "To live outside the law, you must he
honest" and "She doesn't have to say she's faithful/Yet she's true,
like ice, like fire.
We talked about emotions before. You can't be a slave to your
emotions. If you're a slave to your emotions you're dependent on
your emotions, and you're only dealing with your conscious mind.
But the film is about the fact that you have to be faithful to your
subconscious, unconscious, superconscious — as well as to
your conscious. Integrity is a facet of honesty. It has to do with
knowing yourself.
At the end of the film, Renaldo is with two women in a
room (the Woman in White played by Joan Baez and Clara played by
Sara Dylan), and he says: "Evasiveness is only in the mind —
truth is on many levels... Ask me anything and I'll tell you the
truth." Clara and the Woman in White both ask him: "Do you love
her?" as they point to catch other — not: "Do you love
me?"
Possessiveness. It was a self-focused kind of question. And
earlier, one of the women in the whorehouse talks about the
ego-protection cords she wears around her neck. Do you remember
that?... In the scene you mentioned, did you notice that Renaldo
was looking at the newspaper which had an article on Bob Dylan and
Joan Baez in it? Joan Baez and Bob Dylan at this point are an
illusion. It wasn't planned that way. Joan Baez without Bob Dylan
isn't too much of an illusion because she's an independent woman
and her independence asserts itself. But Joan Baez with Bob Dylan
is.
So at the moment you open up that newspaper, art and
life really come together.
Exactly.
And what about the moment when Joan Baez, looking at
Clara, says: "Who is this woman?" and you cut to your singing Sara?
Talk about art and life!
It's as far as you can take it — meaning personally and
generally. Who is this woman? Obviously, this woman is a figment of
the material world. Who is this woman who has no name? Who is this
woman, she says... who is this woman, as if she's talking about
herself. Who this woman is is told to you, earlier on, when you see
her coming out of the church carrying a rope. You know she means
business, you know she has a purpose.
Another way of putting it is: the singer's character onstage is always becoming Renaldo. By singing "Sara," the singer comes as close to Renaldo as he can get. It brings everything as close as possible without two becoming one.
Advertisement
It was pretty amazing to see you use your personal life
and the myth of your life so nakedly in that scene with Renaldo and
the two women.
Right, but you're talking to me as a director now.
Still, you do have that scene with Joan Baez and Sara
Dylan.
Well, Sara Dylan here is working as Sara Dylan. She has the same
last name as Bob Dylan, but we may not be related. If she couldn't
have played the role of Clara, she wouldn't have done it.
Is she talking about her real problems or pretending
that she's an adventurer?
We can make anybody's problems our problems.
Some people will obviously think that this film either
broke up your marriage or is a kind of incantation to make your
marriage come back together.
Either one of those statements I can't relate to. It has nothing to
do with the breakup of my marriage. My marriage is over. I'm
divorced. This film is a film.
Why did you make yourself so vulnerable?
You must be vulnerable to be sensitive to reality. And to me being
vulnerable is just another way of saying that one has nothing more
to lose. I don't have anything but darkness to lose. I'm way beyond
that. The worst thing that could happen is that the film will be
accepted and that the next one will be compared unfavorably to this
one.
Strangely, the scene where the two women confront
Renaldo reminds me of King Lear, in which each of the
daughters has to say how much she loves her father.
You're right. Renaldo sees himself as Cordelia.
I've always interpreted some of the 'Basement Tapes' as
being concerned with ideas from King Lear: "Too much of
nothing/Can make a man abuse a king"; "Oh what dear daughter 'neath
the sun/Would treat a father so,/To wait upon him hand and foot/And
always tell him, 'No'?"
Exactly. In the later years it changed from "king" to "clown."
King Lear had a fool around him, too, and, when the fool leaves,
Cordelia comes back. She's back, takes his place, and he takes
hers.
The roles are all interchangeable.
As in "Tangled Up in Blue" and as in your
movie.
Yes it is.
Were you specifically influenced by King Lear
when you wrote songs like "Tears of Rage"?
No, Songs like that were based on the concept that one is one.
"...and all alone and ever more shall be
so."
Exactly. What comes is gone forever every time.
But one is difficult to deal with, so Christians gave us
the Trinity.
The Christians didn't bring in anything — it was the
Greeks.
Jesus is a very strong figure in Renaldo and
Clara, I noticed. There's that song by you called "What Will
You Do When Jesus Comes?" There's the woman who says to you in the
restaurant: "There's nowhere to go. Just stand and place yourself
like the cross and I'll receive you." And then there are the shots
of the huge cement crucifix in the Catholic Grotto.
Right. Jesus is the most identifiable figure in Western culture,
and yet he was exploited, used and exploited. We all have been.
There's also that scene, near the end of the film, where
Allen Ginsberg takes you around to see the glassed-in sculptures of
the Stations of the Cross — and we see Jesus killed for the
second time and then buried under the weight of the cross. On one
level, the film is about the Stations of the Cross, isn't
it?
Yeah, you're right, like the double vision having to be killed
twice. Like why does Jesus really die?
Spiritually or politically?
Realistically... Because he's a healer, Jesus is a healer. So he
goes to India, finds out how to be a healer and becomes one. But
see, I believe that he overstepped his duties a little bit. He
accepted and took on the bad karma of all the people he healed. And
he was filled with so much bad karma that the only way out was to
burn him up.
In my film, we're looking at masks a lot of the time. And then when the dream becomes so solidified that it has to be taken to the stage of reality, then you'll see stone, you'll see a statue — which is even a further extension of the mask: the statue of Mary in front of the statue of Jesus on the cross in the Crucifix Grotto.
Throughout the film, I also noticed the continual
reappearance of the red rose. Every woman has a
rose.
It has a great deal to do with what's happening in the movie. Do
you remember the woman in the carriage? She's bringing a rose to
Renaldo, who gives it back to her.
But then it appears in your hat when you're
singing.
By that time, it's all fallen apart and shattered, the dream is
gone... it could be anywhere after that.
Advertisement
Joan Baez carries one when she's with Mamma. And then
the violinist Scarlet Rivera gives it to you in your dressing
room.
That's right. The rose is a symbol of fertility
Also of the soul 'The Romance of the Rose'- the
dreamer's vision of the soul.
That's right... The most mysterious figure in the film is the
conductor on the train. Do you remember him?
He's the guy who tells the Masked Tortilla — who
says he's going to a wedding — that he's only been on the
train for four hours (there's that magical four hours again!) and
not for the six days that he imagines.
Yeah, he tells him, too, that he's going to possibly the largest
city in the East.
I figured it was New York.
No. The largest city in the East!
The Magi!
That's not exactly what he's talking about — it's more like
the holy crossroads.
There's another scene like that in which Mick Ronson is
blocking Ronnie Hawkins' way to a backstage area. He seemed like
some kind of guardian.
He's the Guardian of the Gates. But scenes like these work in
terms of feeling. It's like with Tarot cards — you don't have
to be confused as to what they mean... someone else who knows can
read them for you.
"Nothing is revealed," you sing at the end of "The
Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest." Is anything revealed at
the end of Renaldo and Clara?
Yeah, I'll tell you what the film reveals: this film reveals that
there's a whole lot to reveal beneath the surface of the soul, but
it's unthinkable.
(Silence)
That's exactly what it reveals. It reveals the depths that there are to reveal. And that's the most you can ask, because things are really very invisible. You can't reveal the invisible. And this film goes as far as we can to reveal that.
Under a statue of Isis in the city of Sais is the
following inscription: "I am everything that was, that is, that
shall be.... Nor has any mortal ever been able to discover what
lies under my veil."
That's a fantastic quotation. That's true, exactly. Once you see
what's under the veil, what happens to you? You die, don't you, or
go blind?
I wanted to tie in two things we've talked about: the idea of integrity and the idea of Jesus. In your song "I Want You," you have the lines:
Now all my fathers, they've gone down,
True love they've been without it.
But all their daughters put me down
'Cause I don't think about it.
These are some of my favorite lines of yours, and to me
they suggest that real desire is stronger than frustration or
guilt.
I know. It's incredible you find that there. I know it's true. And
in Renaldo and Clara there's no guilt. But that's why
people will take offense at it, if they are offended by it in
anyway, because of the lack of guilt in the movie. None at all.
This brings us back to Jesus.
Jesus is... well, I'm not using Jesus in the film so much as I'm
using the concept of Jesus — the idea of Jesus as a man, not
the virgin birth.
But what about the concept of masochism associated with
Jesus?
That's what happened to Jesus. People relate to the masochism, to
the spikes in his hand, to the blood coming out, to the fact that
he was crucified. What would have happened to him if he hadn't been
crucified? That's what draws people to him. There are only signals
of that in this film — like a fingernail blade at one
point.
Advertisement
What about the line in "Wedding Song": "Your love cuts
like a knife."
Well, it's bloodletting, it's what heals all disease. Neither
aggression nor anger interests me. Violence only does on an
interpretive level, only when it's a product of reason.
People are attracted to blood. I'm personally not consumed by the desire to drink the blood. But bloodletting is meaningful in that it can cure disease. But we didn't try to make a film of that nature. This film concerns itself with the dream. There's no blood in the dream, the dream is cold. This film concerns itself only with the depth of the dream — the dream as seen in the mirror.
The next film might have some blood... I'm trying to locate Lois Smith to be in it. She would represent the idea of innocence. Do you know who she is? She was the barmaid in East of Eden. I'm trying to line up some people for the film, and I can't find her...
For some reason I've just thought of my favorite singer.
Who is that?
Om Kalsoum — the Egyptian woman who died a few years ago. She
was my favorite.
What did you like about her?
It was her heart.
Do you like dervish and Sufi singing, by the
way?
Yeah, that's where my singing really comes from... except that I
sing in America. I've heard too much Leadbelly really to be too
much influenced by the whirling dervishes.
Now that we somehow got onto this subject, who else do
you like right now? New Wave groups?
No, I'm not interested in them. I think Alice Cooper is an
overlooked songwriter. I like Ry Cooder. And I like Dave Mason's
version of something which is on the jukebox right now.
I wonder what you think of the guy who ends your movie
singing this fulsome, crooning version of "In the Morning" with
those memorable lines: "I'll be yawning into the morning of my
life." Why is he there?
The film had to end with him because he represents the fact that
Renaldo could be dreaming. And he might be singing for Renaldo
— representing him, the darkness representing the light.
He's like what's happened to one sentimental part of
rock & roll in the Seventies.
He's not rock & roll.
Rock & roll isn't rock & roll
anymore.
You're right, there's no more rock & roll. It's an imitation,
we can forget about that. Rock & roll has turned itself inside
out. I never did do rock & roll, I'm just doing the same old
thing I've always done.
You've never sung a rock & roll song?
No, I never have, only in spirit.
You can't really dance to one of your
songs.
I couldn't.
Imagine dancing to "Rainy Day Woman #12 & 35." It's
kind of alienating. Everyone thought it was about being stoned, but
I always thought it was about being all alone.
So did I. You could write about that for years... Rock & roll
ended with Phil Spector. The Beatles weren't rock & roll
either. Nor the Rolling Stones. Rock & roll ended with Little
Anthony and the Imperials. Pure rock & roll.
With "Goin' Out of My Head"?
The one before that... Rock & roll ended in 1959.
When did it begin for you?
1954
What is there now?
Programmed music. Quadruple tracking.
What do you think about the Seventies?
The Seventies I see as a period of reconstruction after the
Sixties, that's all. That's why people say: well, it's boring,
nothing's really happening, and that's because wounds are healing.
By the Eighties, anyone who's going to be doing anything will have
his or her cards showing. You won't be able to get back in the game
in the Eighties.
I came across something you wrote a while back:
Desire... never fearful
finally faithful
it will guide me well
across all bridges
inside all tunnels
never failn'.
I even remember where I wrote that. I wrote that in New Hampshire. I think I was all alone.
Here's something else you wrote:
Mine shall be a strong loneliness
dissolvin' deep
t' the depths of my freedom:
an' that, then, shall
remain my song.
You seem to have stayed true to that
feeling.
I haven't had any reason to stray.
In "The Times They Are A-Changin" you sing: "He that
gets hurt/Will be he who has stalled." What has kept you
installed?
I don't know. Mainly because I don't believe in this life.
The Buddhist tradition talks about illusion, the Jewish
tradition about allusion. Which do you feel closer
to?
I believe in both, but I probably lean to allusion. I'm not a
Buddhist. I believe in life, but not this life.
What life do you believe in?
Real life.
Do you ever experience real life?
I experience it all the time, it's beyond this life.
[From Issue 257 — January 26, 1978]
(Click here to read The Rolling Stone Interview: Part II)