Advertisement
| "James Ellroy's American Apocalypse" was originally printed in Issue 1089. Read Ellroy's take on why fiction should be vulgar and why he's not a fan of Raymond Chandler in our bonus Q&A. |
On a recent New York morning, James Ellroy, the self-proclaimed "Demon Dog" of American fiction, is in a good mood. "I feel like the weight of a lifetime has been lifted off me," he says, sitting in a hotel room. "I'm 61, and I feel like a kid. All I've wanted, ever, was to write great fucking novels, have a couple of dogs and fuck women. What else is there? I mean, a good hamburger's OK, but. . . ."
Ellroy is a master of shtick. Over the course of a few minutes he can veer from over-the-top braggadocio ("I'm the Beethoven of crime fiction") to hipster jive ("can't make the scene without caffeine") to unapologetic perversion ("I'm a sex fiend!") to biblical righteousness ("I'm a Scottish minister's son, and I believe in privation and a personal responsibility to God"). Best known for his modern noir classic L.A. Confidential, Ellroy has just released Blood's a Rover, the last novel in his Underworld U.S.A. trilogy. The book completes his bleak and disturbing vision of the metastasized cancers at the heart of the midcentury American empire — from the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam to J. Edgar Hoover and Howard Hughes — as seen through the interconnected schemes and criminal enterprises of rogue FBI agents, homicidal cops, mobsters and contract killers.
Ellroy's obsession with the dark side of America can be traced to the well-documented traumas of his early years: his mother's unsolved murder, his ne'er-do-well father who died not long after. A teenage voyeur who broke into women's homes to steal their lingerie, Ellroy washed out of the Army and spent the next decade addicted to speed and booze, jailed for petty thefts and often homeless, living on the streets of L.A. After sobering up in 1977, he began earning a living as a golf caddie, got some books published, then emerged out of nowhere as the bestselling author of The Black Dahlia and The Big Nowhere, with a distinctive and brutal style that one critic described as "so hard-boiled it burns the pot."
But as his fame grew, Ellroy's personal life grew darker. Two marriages crumbled, and he threw himself deeper into his work — and wound up suffering a mental breakdown in 2001, during the book tour for The Cold Six Thousand. "Flew too high, worked too hard," he says. "Crazy suppressed shit came out and just blew up in my face." Now, eight years later, he's finishing up a memoir called The Hilliker Curse and enjoying the release of Blood's a Rover, a giant historical noir that provides a romantic coda to his Underworld U.S.A. series. The protagonists, whom Ellroy calls "right-wing leg-breakers," pursue redemption in the form of a left-wing agitator named Joan, making it like so many of his novels: three men obsessed with a single woman over the course of a great big bloody book.
Advertisement
Your Underworld U.S.A. trilogy covers 1958 to 1972, the
years when you were most marginalized — homeless, addicted.
Is that one of the reasons you wanted to write about that
period?
The trilogy derives entirely from my reading of Don DeLillo's novel
Libra in 1988. It's told largely from the viewpoint of Lee
Harvey Oswald, and DeLillo makes him the single greatest, most
fully realized loner in American history. It was also the first
time I had seen, in literature, an unintelligent and malleable
dipshit portrayed with such empathy and complexity. I realized,
"Holy shit — this fucking book is so fucking good that now I
can't write about the Kennedy assassination." But then I began to
see that I could write a trilogy that would chart all the
harbingers of JFK's assassination and create a complete human
infrastructure of big public events. After the L.A. Quartet, I
didn't want to write anything that could be categorized as a crime
novel. I wanted to explore a theme that I call the "private
nightmare of public policy."
What's the private nightmare?
The outline of American history from 1958 to '63 is iconic and
well-known: the emergence of the civil rights movement, the ascent
of JFK, J. Edgar Hoover's repressive shit, the Mob, the Cuban
Missile Crisis. Then the decade of revolution in the youth culture,
the continuing nightmare in Vietnam, more bombs, more crazy CIA
shit, political assassinations. We know that. That's the public
policy. But who's out there taking names, doing the wiretapping,
breaking legs, shaking people down, making a buck out of it —
and suffering the convoluted morality of it? Who's coming to the
point where they can't do it anymore, and what makes them change?
That's the private nightmare. That's Blood's a Rover.
This is a very dark trilogy. Did it fuck you up writing
the books?
It fucked me up completely. I inhabited the souls of these
leg-breakers. I stayed with them morally and spiritually. But
Blood's a Rover is about the necessity of revolution and
change. This book goes somewhere entirely different from the first
two.
Deeper into the moral consequences of violence and
corruption?
Right. Blood's a Rover is where the people who have been
through the shit of 1958 to 1968 start talking about what it all
means. I lived through that shit. I sensed it going on around me
but (a) I was bombed until '77, and (b) I was an outlier in just a
lot of ways. I was never a rock & roll guy; I was always a
classical-music guy. I was never a peacemaker; I was a fuck-you
right-winger. I've got a weird view of American history that I
think is viable and allows me to spread empathy around fairly
evenly.
Do you think it's naive to believe that Lee Harvey
Oswald acted alone?
It would be a triumph of spatial logic and empirical thinking over
imagination to believe that something else wasn't going on. I look
at the lone-gunman theory and think, "It doesn't make moral,
historical or metaphysical sense to me, so I'm just going to reject
it." And it's a better fucking story my way. So I won't argue about
the lone gunman — I don't give a shit. So what? Fuck you.
Who's your daddy? Who's got the better story to tell? Guess what,
it's me.
One of your characters, a young right-winger named Don
Crutchfield, is so willfully out of step with the times that he
seems like a fictionalized version of you.
That's me — a big guy with a crew cut and straight-leg pants
in the Summer of Love wondering why he can't get laid. "Well, maybe
if you quit jacking off and listen to rock & roll instead of
Beethoven, you might be a little more likely." In the book,
Crutchfield doesn't know what to do for Christmas. He's never been
laid, and he's 23, and he's lonely. He's a peeper, and he's got two
options: go to midnight service in the Lutheran church, or go peep
black women in South Central L.A. That's me in a nutshell.
Do you still have those right-wing
tendencies?
Right-wing tendencies? I do that to fuck with people. I thought
Bush was a slimebag and the most disastrous American president in
recent times. I voted for Obama. He's a lot like Jack Kennedy
— they both have big ears and infectious smiles. But Obama is
a deeper guy. Kennedy was an appetite guy. He wanted pussy,
hamburgers, booze. Jack did a lot of dope.
Advertisement
So why do you still seem to identify with the right-wing
goons you create?
I'm a Christian, and my books are stories of redemption. I show you
the karmic consequences of horrific deeds. More often than not, I
want you to love my characters in the end because they have
transcended. They have found something bigger, deeper, morally
surer than themselves.
You once wrote that Dashiell Hammett perfectly captured
the American notion that a job can destroy a person. Is that what
happens to your characters?
The core of Hammett's art is the masculine figure in American
society — he is a job holder. He goes at his job with a
ruthless determination and has an unwillingness to look beyond it.
That's who these guys of mine are. They are so fucking proficient,
even as their lives are in precipitous decline. They're eaten up,
but they're driven by their inbred American sense of
responsibility. There's an undercurrent of tenderness that's
driving them as they go about doing their jobs so very
ruthlessly.
The way you portray J. Edgar Hoover's wiretapping is
very present-day, especially given what happened under
Bush.
I don't know what I pick out of the zeitgeist. I'm not being
disingenuous — I honestly don't know. Let me tell you about
my life. I'm 61. I exercise a lot, I don't drink, I don't use
drugs, I don't sleep very well. I'm very limited in my interests.
I've got a big apartment, I've got a big sports car. I quit running
around trying to get married. "Get married and impregnate women"
hasn't played out for me. My life has become a matriarchy. I talk
to Helen Knode, my ex-wife, my girlfriends and colleagues on the
phone. I've never used a computer. I'm not shitting you — I'm
cut off from the world.
Your life was such a disaster for so long. Did you ever
think you wouldn't make it?
I was always looking to get off, and I had a very pronounced cold
streak. But as fucked up as I was, I always had faith. And I loved
to laugh. I could always go in a corner, scratch my balls, jack
off, pull some dipshit stunt, like dining and dashing. I needed to
make my way out in the world because my dad was completely fucked
up. I never felt pissed off about it. I never felt like, "Ooh, I
don't have a family." I always wanted a family.
That's surprising. Given your books, it's easy to
believe that you see the world as an unrelentingly dark
place.
No, no, I'm not a misanthrope. I'm optimistic. Heck, I think human
beings can evolve over time. I like people — in a distanced
way [laughs]. Individuals have prominence over their
psyches and can liberate themselves from horrible states of being
as the world goes to shit around them. And I've chosen to do
that.
In your upcoming memoir, "The Hilliker Curse," you
express regret for the way you sold books by using your mother's
murder.
I was young and callous. But now I realize my mother and I are not
a murder story. We are a love story. And the central story I have
to tell is women. I knew that if I consciously applied my talent
and my brain power to the persona of my mother, it would lead me to
be more receptive to women in general.
In the memoir you also write about your overpowering
lust for women. But on another level, you're very
puritanical.
I want women. But it's discerning, it's tender. I don't see sex as
being inherently squalid — I see the marketing of sexuality
and the vulgarization of sex as being depraved. They've denuded and
made common something holy and sacred. We need to reinvest in sex,
have less sex, wait till the eighth date before you fuck and
suck.
In "Blood's a Rover," you seem obsessed with Joan, the
left-wing Jewish activist.
I wrote this book for a woman I was in love with named Joan. It was
the first time I ever did that. I've started following women
involuntarily who look like Joan. You just walk 10 yards, and it's
not her.
But you keep following?
I eventually come to my senses. Definitely a fucking brain
click.
Do you still peep women?
Yeah. Yeah, I do. I stay in on holidays. I live in a deco building
on the edge of Hollywood. One holiday, I was peeping this big-ass
redhead. She was flipping burgers, and her blouse would come up,
and she would pull it down. She bent down way low, and I could see
her bra strap. Then my buddy called and said, "What are you doing,
Ellroy? Come on out here, we're cooking." I said, "I don't want any
food; I'm peeping. Leave me the fuck alone."
Do you feel guilty about that?
No.
Why not? Do see voyeurism as a form of
appreciation?
Yeah, you want to be saved. You're genetically wired to salvation,
and women are our beacons in the night.
Advertisement
And that doesn't strike you as weird?
I am utterly cut out to be in dark rooms talking to women on the
telephone and working. My buddy called recently and said, "Hey, we
got an extra ticket for Fleetwood Mac." What the fuck? I'd rather
watch flies fuck in Alabama. I live in a vacuum so that I might go
back and live more assiduously in pockets of American history.
Is that the secret to your success?
There are greater writers out there, and more gifted writers. What
I am is a thinking machine. I see myself as emblematic of extreme
drive and ambition and focus. It's given me hyperacuity. I can
write like a motherfucker, and man, do I rigorously think about
shit and what it all means.
What led to your mental breakdown?
I went through a period of months and months where I was in love
with a married woman who was never gonna leave her husband. I'd
just be surrounded by that big fuckin' cosmic nothingness. You
could say it's the issue of not being able to be with the woman you
love. But more than anything else, it was just being alone in the
cosmos and knowing that you're gonna die.
Did you see it coming?
It was the shit of a lifetime just oozing out of my palms. Physical
stress, overwork, fissuring unconsciousness, boorishness,
recklessness. Much too much mental energy expended for too many
years. Raging panic attacks and horrible insomnia fits. I was just
gone. I was way out of my emotions — shit roared through me
at 1,000 rpms. I couldn't hold anything back. And I couldn't
control anything through narrative. It was the worst time in my
life.
You ended up in an institution, right?
Yeah, a bunch of them. Overnight at the nut ward in Monterey,
overnight in the nut ward in Tucson. There was no rubber hose, but
I was bombed, what can I tell ya? Before I knew it, I was back at
the Beverly Wilshire Hotel jackin' off to pictures of Anne Sexton
— in clothes! A dead poet! That's how fucked up I am!
[Laughs]
Did you learn anything from losing your
mind?
I learned a lot from the crackup. I want to write great books and
be good to people, and to shamelessly promote myself. But nothing's
worse than an ambitious person with no control. Someone who'll
hustle anybody, shabbily. No one wants to have anything to do with
people like that.
So it made you a better writer?
I wanna continue to write big-ass, shit-kicking, profound books.
I'm arrogant, and I'm fearful. But I'm not as fearful as I used to
be. The crackup took a lot of my fear away.
[From Issue 1089 — October 15, 2009]
Related Stories: