Still on the even-handed side of “attack ad”:
Comments
davie.. | 8/13/2008, 2:33 pm EST
kudos
well done
DirtyDennis | 8/13/2008, 9:06 pm EST
I have to say that if I was a young man, I’d have to be b-u-ying me some clothes made by Hot Girls.
I dare not click to see the girls in action. Might be more than I can take.
PS Is Liebermann the biggest jerk yet or what?
DirtyDennis | 8/13/2008, 9:08 pm EST
To quote Buggs, “An Ultra Maroon.”
okthen | 8/14/2008, 11:10 am EST
ok, who does Delta Wild Man have to blow to get that rollingstone car ad to STOP POPPING UP? Jesus jumpin’ jehosaphat.
DirtyDennis | 8/14/2008, 12:17 pm EST
To those who don’t give a whit about political ads but are curious what direction this country ‘might’ be taking, tomdispatch dot com has a nice little essay by Andrew Bacevich.
An excerpt:
“The four lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan boil down to this: Events have exposed as illusory American pretensions to having mastered war. Even today, war is hardly more subject to human control than the tides or the weather. Simply trying harder — investing ever larger sums in even more advanced technology, devising novel techniques, or even improving the quality of American generalship — will not enable the United States to evade that reality.
As measured by results achieved, the performance of the military since the end of the Cold War and especially since 9/11 has been unimpressive. This indifferent record of success leads some observers to argue that we need a bigger army or a different army.
But the problem lies less with the army that we have — a very fine one, which every citizen should wish to preserve — than with the requirements that we have imposed on our soldiers. Rather than expanding or reconfiguring that army, we need to treat it with the respect that it deserves. That means protecting it from further abuse of the sort that it has endured since 2001.
America doesn’t need a bigger army. It needs a smaller — that is, more modest — foreign policy, one that assigns soldiers missions that are consistent with their capabilities. Modesty implies giving up on the illusions of grandeur to which the end of the Cold War and then 9/11 gave rise. It also means reining in the imperial presidents who expect the army to make good on those illusions. When it comes to supporting the troops, here lies the essence of a citizen’s obligation.”
jeffery mcnary | 8/14/2008, 1:58 pm EST
maybe he should run one more for the road on lady clinton…right before her delegate count at the convention.
the clinton gang has followed the junior senator from illinois out to the parking lot after the dance. now they’ll mug ‘em. i always felt them dems could find more and more creative ways to run off a cliff.
DirtyDennis | 8/14/2008, 4:33 pm EST
C’mon JefMac, Wild Thingie is a LOT of things, but that’s not one of them. (as if I knew). Okay, he doesn’t deserve THAT kind of cheap shot.
Coach, so, HRC’s gonna get entered. And if JefMac is any kind of seer, which I doubt, she and hers are going to try to steal the convention. As if. I could see someone on the Right pulling crap like that, but not on the Left and NOT Hil.
If she did, we’d start the greatest write-in ever and I’ll be out knocking on doors (carefully, in my part of the woods. Hellooooo the house.)
DirtyDennis | 8/14/2008, 4:34 pm EST
PS After elected, I think BHO should name Geoff Smith his NSA.
Dr. Ralph | 8/14/2008, 6:46 pm EST
Where’s the NOBAMA stickers? All over fly-over country just in case you guys haven’t seen them… come on down, set a spell, take your shoes off, y’all come back now ya hear?
Jeugenen | 8/15/2008, 5:05 pm EST
LIBERAL OBAMA OR NEO-CON/NEO-LIB MC-CAIN
The political struggle between a young, bright, pleasing, honest, competent, unifying, benevolent, and politically sane leader; and an old, dull, obnoxious, incompetent, dishonest, divisive, vicious, and politically insane leader and is a classic struggle between good and evil.

Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.