Previous Next Latest

Headline of the Week

5/8/08, 2:32 pm EST

“Clinton won’t quit; Obama doesn’t care”

The hed captures it all, no?


Previous Next Latest

Comments

jeffery mcnary | 5/8/2008, 2:51 pm EST

ms. clinton comes from the school of thought which believes ‘just because you have a red umbrella doesn’t mean there’s water on mars.” i to come from that school…and there’s lot’s…lot’s yet to learn about the junior senator from illinois.

Dallas | 5/8/2008, 3:57 pm EST

The whole thing is F-ed. I’m ready to write in “Homer Simpson” or “Peter Griffin” on election day. These two fictitious dimwits have more to offer than all three candidates combined.

Anonymous | 5/8/2008, 4:33 pm EST

(Jed Clampett)

This is nothing, merely a way of selecting the right person.
HRC will do whatever it takes to win, now she’s vested for some of her own money. It’s imperative that they win. To her, it’s no longer about the desire to elevate the nation, it’s about getting to a powerful position where they can comand another $100+ million in a few years.

For Sen Obama, it’s about democracy. The process calls for all states to vote and have their say, why complain if the opponent still has dreams of pie in the sky or some other ‘ACE IN THE HOLE’. Perhaps she’s confident that in the end she can win by default. (DD?)

If you wanna see a really screwed up situation, you should see what is going on with party leadership election in Mexico. Three states had severe voting discrepancies. Ballot boxes where never set up or used yet showed up full of votes. Others that were suppossed to have only 1000 in them had twice as much. In other places evidence was found that certain factions in the party offered free drinks to the citizens to vote for them in the way of cupons. etc. etc.
Funny thing though. people gripe about how long it’s taking to get a candidate out of this ‘process’ but didn’t raise much of a stink when their last president was appointed by the supreme court on a margin of 500 or so votes. Perhaps we’ll be more vocal whe the time for indictments comes around.

utterly astounding!!!

Anonymous | 5/8/2008, 5:57 pm EST

Remember the Washington DC madam that ‘committed suicide?’ get ready for an october surprise.

Who do you think killed her? Sure, it was one of our trained killers the military is so proud of, but do you think it was ordered by a dem or a rep? We’ll find out soon enough I guess. Good thing she digitized all the files and spread the copies among a few trusted friends. Maybe she did have the Penguin on her list.

DirtyDennis | 5/11/2008, 9:39 am EST

If someone has asked this, I missed it. Who is Michelle Dubert?

DirtyDennis | 5/11/2008, 10:08 am EST

This wouldn’t be the “34th Street” Michelle Dubert?

Matt Garville | 5/11/2008, 9:47 pm EST

If Obama continues to care about Clinton, it would be of detriment to his campaign. Obama cannot devote attention or time to Clinton.

The writing is on the wall and Clinton’s political grave is already being dug. All she has to face reality and realize this race is over.

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement