Previous Next Latest

The Pentagon’s Propaganda Brigade

4/20/08, 12:51 pm EST

This is one of the most important pieces of public-interest journalism in years.

The NYTIMES has uncovered a sophisticated and devilishly well-excuted propaganda campaign by the Pentagon to deploy dozens of retired military officers to the nation’s airwaves to parrot administration spin on “progress” in Iraq.

Why would these “military analysts” play ball? Because they uniformly had financial ties to military contractors and saw misinforming the American public a small price to pay to secure inside access and classified information and to ingratiate themselves to decision-makers on the procurement side.

“We knew we had extraordinary access,” said Timur J. Eads, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and Fox analyst who is vice president of government relations for Blackbird Technologies, a fast-growing military contractor.

Like several other analysts, Mr. Eads said he had at times held his tongue on television for fear that “some four-star could call up and say, ‘Kill that contract.’ ”

Here’s the nut of the story, destined for a Pulitzer:

The Times successfully sued the Defense Department to gain access to 8,000 pages of e-mail messages, transcripts and records describing years of private briefings, trips to Iraq and Guantánamo and an extensive Pentagon talking points operation.

These records reveal a symbiotic relationship where the usual dividing lines between government and journalism have been obliterated.

Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts as “message force multipliers” or “surrogates” who could be counted on to deliver administration “themes and messages” to millions of Americans “in the form of their own opinions.”

Though many analysts are paid network consultants, making $500 to $1,000 per appearance, in Pentagon meetings they sometimes spoke as if they were operating behind enemy lines, interviews and transcripts show. Some offered the Pentagon tips on how to outmaneuver the networks, or as one analyst put it to Donald H. Rumsfeld, then the defense secretary, “the Chris Matthewses and the Wolf Blitzers of the world.” Some warned of planned stories or sent the Pentagon copies of their correspondence with network news executives. Many — although certainly not all — faithfully echoed talking points intended to counter critics.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

DirtyDennis | 4/22/2008, 6:39 pm EST

That’s not me!!

Anonymous | 4/22/2008, 4:45 pm EST

unfortunately, the one trick pony doesn’t realize the trick has gotten old and boring.

Anonymous | 4/22/2008, 4:31 pm EST

Three threads if five days? WTF? And then I suppose we’re going to get about 8 threads about today’s PA primary that nobody is going to read or care about. I think it’s time that Tim had an intern or underling take care of this site. It’s just not very interesting anymore.

Borat | 4/21/2008, 8:44 pm EST

I like Iraq… It’s NIIIICE :D

The Talking Point Spewers | 4/21/2008, 7:29 pm EST

I thought we had figured out long ago that the vast right-wing conspiracy had us all under its boot.

Repuglicans eat Coach's testes | 4/21/2008, 5:25 pm EST

I don’t know about how that feels, but I would love to have that cop from the AARP advertisement give me a golden shower. Yowza!

Anonymous | 4/21/2008, 4:55 pm EST

Hey repuglicans, how does it feel to find out that your golden boys have been $elling you a false bill of goods for the last 7+ years?

beakymomo | 4/21/2008, 2:52 pm EST

Somehow I can’t see the networks and large papers following through on this — “Yes, American people, we’ve been using corrupt biased sources for the last five plus years. You can’t trust anything we told you about the War in Iraq.” I guess it’s up to the blogs and “pseudo-journalists” to run with this story which should be leading on the nightly news and on the front pages of the nation’s papers.

What really gets me is comments saying “so what, we knew this all along.” Well, OK, but had it been proven? Now it has been.

Anonymous | 4/21/2008, 1:49 pm EST

Keep telling yourself that, when and if it happens we will know this is no longer a nation of laws, but a nation of men, much like China and Zimbabwe. When that happens we will understand that the empire must fall soon.

jp | 4/21/2008, 1:10 pm EST

What difference does it make? No one is getting impeached for this, no one is going to be prosecuted for war crimes for torturing terrorism suspects, nothing will come of this. As for Pulitzer worthy? Hardly. This is nothing more than reflexive guilt stemming from the fact that they know damn well they dropped the ball by not asking the right questions when it still mattered.

JIM | 4/21/2008, 10:43 am EST

Oh ..BIG WHOOP ! So what ! Do you really think that ANYONE cares at all?? So the criminal gang is caught once again. And what are we going to about it? Nothing as always so why even say it’s a pulitzer prize … No the pulitzer goes to you guys for all of the Brit Spears coverage , NOW THATS REPORTING !!! Yeah . what a sham.

Anonymous | 4/21/2008, 8:13 am EST

How much evidence do you need before you start actual impeachment proceedings. Do not yet have the equivalent of the stained blue dress? do the testimony of so many former officials account for nothing? wouldn’t the republicans look like idiots supporting this prez in light of all the evidence of wrongdoing against him and totally loose their standing with the public and therefore their slim chance to affect change in the congress? Wake up america, they aren’t doing it because they aren’t going to, they are making too much profits by maintaining the status quo.

tom | 4/20/2008, 9:54 pm EST

Is this the same NYT that supported the war–it can’t be, itjust can’t be!

David... | 4/20/2008, 9:45 pm EST

C’mon. Who do you think you’re kidding? This story will not get a Pulitzer.

This report is good, legitimate reporting…exactly what reporters are taught in school, and hired to do at Newspapers and TV stations. This guy is just doing his job.

Beats the regular FLUFF we get every day, don’t you think? When are YOU gonna do some real reporting instead of regurgitating other people’s columns, TD?

Anonymous | 4/20/2008, 8:26 pm EST

(Jed Clampett)

Could it be possible that this is evidence of the capabilities of the military are being used by a rogue administration to subvert information presented to the people and replace it with disinformation, thereby carrying out an intelligence operation against it’s own people in clear contravention of the constitution and perpetrated with direct involvement of the office of the VP?
What exactly are we waiting for to start impeachment proceedings? would it be beneficial to the republicant’s to ignore an impeachment when the evidence to the wrongdoing is so strong? would they actually have the audacity to defend the admin as they did Clements and others who polluted themselves and deceived others with steroids? could that actually help them in the congressional elections?

Chris | 4/20/2008, 1:33 pm EST

Are you really surprised?

Chris | 4/20/2008, 1:33 pm EST

Are you really surprised?

Coach | 4/20/2008, 1:12 pm EST

OMG, I’m flabbergasted!

Let’s hear the hawks weasel their way out of this one. Let’s hear talking point spewers justify this.

Time for the media to take over and not let stories like this die. Quit being railroaded by the administration and distracted by the overload of unconstitutional doings by Bush et al.

It’s not funny anymore.

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement