(DD)

Jesus TD, you’re a hypocritical, one-dimensional, one-trick pony. It pains me to point out that the keystone of our ‘democracy’ is a SECRET BALLOT. I’d sure you’d be trumpeting that fact if BHO was winning them and HRC the caucuses. (I just tacked the hypocritical tag on ’cause I just read all over the ‘real’ news that BHO doesn’t want a ‘redo’ in Michigan. Why, because it’s a primary.)

In another thread you killed a small tree going on comparing BHO and HRC’s foreign policy experience. As I advised Coach, I advise you; read what Wikipedia says about both candidates. Read all of it Tim. Read how she visited 79 countries. Read how she spoke out on the treatment of Afghan women,. Read how she helped create Vital Voices to help women all over the world have a better say in the political processes of their countries. Read how she’s the commissioner on the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Read the whole thing Tim.

As for foreign policy experience, WHO CARES!!??!! Did FDR have foreign policy experience? JFK? RMH? I can’t help but think that if HRC DID have a lot of foreign policy experience, you would think domestic experience was more important. I happen to. If we take care of business at home and treat the rest of the world as equals, our Prez won’t NEED ‘foreign policy’ experience.

You seem to be suffering from early stages of Limbaughism and O’Reillyitis. Give Walter Chronkite a call and ask him what constitutes a good journalist.

PS While you’re at it, call Bill Gates and ask what it takes to be a good techie.

Tim I’m hopeful that you won’t give a second thought to anonymous’ diatribe…some folks just can’t take the truth…but then someone who relies solely on
Wickipedia for the record well…pretty much says it all

Donny,

I don’t post annonymously, that’s why the signature DD is included. Young TD’s had some serious problems with this website and it’s cookies and avoiding one’s name in the little yellow window is thought to offer some protection. Lately the blog’s been acting pretty good so I’m willing to return to ‘normalcy,’ thank you.

I suppose if I only cite one source then it might appear I AM, in fact, one-dimensionable, but let me hasten to assure you that was NOT my logic. Young Tim doesn’t cite the source of his bias towards HRC so I thought by returning him, and others, to the basics, we might establish a common ground from whence to develop a dialog. As you can see, no response was offered to my ‘diatride,’ nor did I expect one. Tim has the enviable position of being able to make the most scurilous of statements, ala Rush, et al, WITHOUT having to pass through RS’ logic/spelling filter.

So, Donny Boy, what in the Wikipedia articles are untrue? What? Didn’t read them? Oh, so where would you suggest I read?

Not only does HRC not win the caucus states, she actually hasn’t won the most primaries either. Counting the Democrats Abroad Global Primary the count is Obama: 15 primary wins, Clinton: 13.