Previous Next Latest

Edwards’ Exit

1/30/08, 6:16 pm EST

The exit of Edwards from the race is a clear boon to the Obama campaign.

The central dynamic of this race has always been Hillary and the two anti-Hillarys. With Edwards gone, Obama becomes the unalloyed repository of the ABC [Anyone But Clinton] vote.

Whether he can run with it or not, Obama finally has his shot to draw a clear distinction between himself and Clinton. Compete head-to-head. Win. Or go home.

The idea that it was somehow better for Obama to have Edwards drag this race into the convention and then have the two of them knock off Hillary with some kind of delegate coup never made much sense to me.

For what it’s worth, my own sense is that a majority of Edwards’ supporters will gravitate to the insurgent candidate. Near as I could tell, Edwards voters were largely white, rural conservative men and what I’ll call Elizabeth Edwards Progressives — a Netrootsy coalition of the party’s bleeding hearts. Among those lunch-bucket dudes, Clinton’s NAFTA support is a real drag. The EEPs, meanwhile, are looking for the most liberal pumpkin in the patch. On the war, at least, that’s Obama.

Edwards has also done Obama a favor by the timing of his exit. Had he stayed in the race any later, today’s news cycle would have been dominated by a discussion of Clinton’s kinda-victory in Florida yesterday, as well as the cooked-up distraction of “the snub.”

Instead the media are in reset mode. Conjecturing where Edwards’ supporters find a home. Theorizing about a potential endorsement. Projecting matchups of Hillary and Obama against McCain.

Knowing the makeup of the Edwards team, I can’t fathom a Clinton endorsement. Who at a table of Elizabeth Edwards, Mudcat Saunders, Joe Trippi, and David Bonoir is going to raise their hand for Clinton? Having interviewed Elizabeth, Edwards’ most influential adviser, in person, I can tell you that her enmity for Clinton is visceral. Trippi is an Obama/movement guy by gut inclination. Mudcat’s on the record as being against Clinton for her NAFTA sins. And I can only imagine a hardscrabble Michigan guy like Bonoir is in the same boat.

The far more likely scenario is that Edwards either continues to hold his tongue, or he times his endorsement of Obama to help give him another boost closer to the fifth.

Either way, this is a good day for the Obama campaign.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

Callimaco | 1/30/2008, 6:29 pm EST

I hate to speak of ugly truths, but are you really so sure those “largely white, rural conservative men” are gonna go and vote for a black man? Or, for that matter, a woman?

And are you really so sure the women among those “Elizabeth Edwards Progressives” aren’t now going to vote their gender?

I’d like to think you’re right, but I’m thinking Obama and Clinton will pretty much split the Edwards voters.

That said, if Obama can target specific patches of Edwards voters in rural regions then that could pay huge dividends in the delegate race.

And Obama should be call Mudcat and see if he wants a job.

Mario Kart | 1/30/2008, 7:38 pm EST

Obama > McCain
McCain > Clinton
::
Obama > Clinton

Magie | 1/30/2008, 7:53 pm EST

I think that Maria’s comment is incorrect. According short and medium range data, it should read:

McCain > Obama
McCain > Clinton but over long term Clinton > McCain, hence

perhaps:
Clinton > Obama and not the reverse.

By the way, Edwards supporter are indeed more inclined to vote for Clinton than Obama. The Edwards supporter are coming from working class family, and it not the territory in which Obama does well.

ray | 1/30/2008, 8:31 pm EST

Thanks John, for getting out in time for there to be a one on one debate before Super tuesday. Its great that History will be made tomorrow and that the Democratic nominee will be a woman or a man of mixed race.

DirtyDennis | 1/31/2008, 8:57 am EST

It would appear Tim has a new Techie. The first thing Techies do is change the look of an ap. There seems to be ‘other’ changes as well.

But my name keeps disappearing and I get more Proxy errors than ever before. But my sense is we’re making progress.

Uncle Mac!! Come back Uncle Mac!! (Think a young Brandon DeWilde running out onto a moon-lit prarie.)

Jed Clampett | 1/31/2008, 11:59 am EST

apparently a not very savvy techie at that. I wonder what backend shennanigans they are trying to implement that is causing so much trouble. Apparently it has to do with the cookies and how they are managed, Problems stop for a while when I delete the RS cookies and some of the other tracking crap advertisers have put in my system. so much for privacy huh? Who still believes that privacy is truly valued and protected in the United States?

Greg | 1/31/2008, 1:08 pm EST

Lots of Edwards supporters , like me , are policy and fact driven people.The Clintons and their DLC (GOP Lite)compatriots are not going to get a lot of Edwards folk on their bandwagon , especially after their race baiting . I can’t believe RFK Jr is in the Hillary camp -Bobby look at the facts : NAFTA , WTO and giveaways to oil interest , media and financial services conglomerates . Why would anyone who is informed and cares about this country and its people support Clinton II ?

miamimax | 1/31/2008, 3:23 pm EST

Getting fired-up!

DirtyDennis | 1/31/2008, 5:01 pm EST

Daaaa Dum, Daaaa Dum.

Just when you thought it was safe, here comes Ralph Nader again. Isn’t this guy a reason euthanasia has social benefits?

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement