Previous Next Latest

That’s the Way ‘Cookie’ Crumbles

11/16/07, 2:11 pm EST

State Department inspector general Howard ‘Cookie’ Krongard has come under fire for attempting to investigate Blackwater, while his brother ‘Buzzy’ — the former number three at the CIA — serves on the board.

But this simple conflict of interest — and Cookie’s inconsistent answers to congress about it — is hardly his worst sin. As I described in “Bush’s Lapdogs” — Rolling Stone’s look at the rampant cronyism and incompetence of the Bush inspector generals — Cookie headed up the State Department’s investigation of whistle-blower accusations of trafficked labor being used to build the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Krongard — in what investigators told me was a breach of every conceivable protocol in a case like this — took on the ‘investigation’ himself. But he gave the contractor, First Kuwaiti, several month’s advance notice of his visit. He let the contractor select the six employees he would interview semi-formally. His evidence gathering consisted of chickenscratch notes “on the backs of things” because he didn’t want people to feel “uncomfortable.”

He then published an informal report whitewashing the whole incident saying he found nothing to validate the descriptions of whistleblowers like Rory Mayberry, who later testified to Congress of having witnessed Filipino workers — who thought they were headed to Dubai to work on hotels — instead having their passports seized and getting stuck on a plane and flown at gunpoint to Baghdad.

Mayberry’s assessment of Krongard’s work?: “I’ve read the State Department Inspector General report on the construction of the embassy, Mr. Chairman. It’s not worth the paper it’s printed on. This is a cover-up.

On a side note, you may remember that one of the last acts of the GOP controlled congress in 2006 was an attempt — ultimately reversed — to cut off funding for the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, Stuart Bowen, a longtime friend of Bush’s from Texas who earned the contempt of his political patrons by actually doing his job. The Republican efforts would have shut down his office — which has exposed billions in waste, fraud, and abuse in Iraq — and have turned over his duties to … you guessed it … Cookie Krongard.

UPDATE: I just received an email from First Kuwaiti’s PR firm, Saylor Company, seeking to discredit Mayberry’s under-oath federal testimony by pushing this WSJ blog entry, which reads in part:

In his July testimony, Mayberry described being on a plane en route to Baghdad in 2006 when 51 Filipinos broke out in panic when they heard they were going to work in Baghdad instead of Dubai. A Philippines government inquiry last month found that only 11 workers were on the flight and that all of them knew there were going to Iraq.

Read the whole post, including House Oversight Chairman Henry Waxman’s rebuttal and judge for yourselves.

It’s also important to note that Mayberry isn’t the only whistle-blower in this case. The broad strokes of his testimony are corroborated by the under-oath federal testimony of John Owens.

And there’s this: The Justice Department has reportedly found the trafficking allegations compelling enough to launch an independent investigation.

UPDATE II: Here’s the video of Mayberry’s testimony.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

Dallas | 11/16/2007, 4:05 pm EST

The truth is out there about all of the corruption in this administration. Most thinking people are well aware of it. Now, the question is, how the hell do we hold these crooks accountable?

Jon | 11/16/2007, 4:10 pm EST

How depressingly unsuprising.

Merkwurdigliebe | 11/16/2007, 4:27 pm EST

hmm, i seem to remeber the same stuff happening under clinton…and bush 1…and Reagan…and Carter…and–oh my god, its endemic!!!!!! I’m shocked, shocked i tells you, that there is cronyism at the highest levels of the US government! and apparently its been happening for some time!!!!

To those who are finally catching on to what politics has been like for eons, welcome to the 21st century

its just now its being reported…how much more are people going to take, democratic, republican, libertarian, green, before real reform gets done in washington…oi vey

It's a new world order party | 11/16/2007, 4:27 pm EST

…and most of us aren’t invited.

Delta Wild Man | 11/16/2007, 7:10 pm EST

Folks, here’s something to remember..

Every time we give our government new authority over us,
as in Health Care, Public Education, Welfare, ect.

We must require for the sake of our democratic republic, and the safety of our very rights, that our “government” also install checks and balances into those new authorities.
Give you an idea.
We want a great health care system right??
Well we do have a great health care system right now, it just needs a little tweaking on affordability,
So what has been proposed to us is, Let’s let our Government take control of our Health Care System.
Before we blindly go where idiots have gone willingly before us, we might want to ask ourselves a question.
” IS THIS GOING TO IMPROVE THINGS FOR EVERYONE??”
If the vast majority of the people here in America have some form of Health Insurance, would a National Health Care System improve the care they are receiving now??
I think if we all were to look at history we would find that the outcome, no matter how hart felt it was intended to be in the beginning, will end in disaster.
To give everyone health care, we must lower the standards of those who presently have health care, and give a ” sub standard ” health care to those who do not have any health care.
That is not what the politicians are saying, But we all know that’s what we’re going to end up with.

A few weeks ago, I proposed a Duel Health Care System.
Some of you may have overlooked it because I posted it.
Well, you might want to look it over once more.

Those people who choose to invest part of their income into Health Insurance would go to ” Type M ” hospitals and they could choose from “Type R” doctors..

Those people who would prefer the government to provide them with Health Care would be required to go to “Type L” hospitals and they would be assigned to “Type P” doctors.

Both Systems would treat illnesses and wounds, however the “Type L” hospitals and “Type P” doctors would be trained to deal with the masses where as “Type M” hospitals and “Type R” doctors would be trained to deal with the individual..

However “Type M” hospitals would not be required to fund “Type L” hospitals, and “Type R” doctors would only be required to pay a small % of their income to malpractice suits, the rest would be funded by trial lawyers who lost their cases against innocent doctors..
“Type P” doctors would not have to worry because they would not make the money that would make it worth wild to sue said doctor..

G.O.D. | 11/17/2007, 2:18 am EST

Merkwurdigliebe | 11/16/2007, 4:27 pm EST:
“hmm, i seem to remeber the same stuff happening under clinton…and bush 1…and Reagan…and Carter…and–oh my god, its endemic!”

…So…Clinton, Bush1, Reagan and Carter all started meaningless wars for which they had to knowingly hire companies using slave labor to build fortified embassies. Nope. Actually, you are wrong: none of them did.

Cronyism doesn’t equal slave labor and you must be from the south to not be enraged that the United States of America-150 years after we vanquished slavery in this country-still employs it elsewhere. The mere idea that this president is in any way the same as his forbearers is the kind of lie Stalin would tell the masses to keep them idiotic. George W. Bush is the single most corrupt, morally reprehensible dictator in United States’ history. Phillipine slave labor? Where is the “concentration camp” outrage? Oh yeah, the slaves aren’t Jewish this time around…

Delta Wild Man | 11/17/2007, 3:28 pm EST

Same old story but now we’re using new faces!!
Way back in World War 2 in the Pacific, if there were no “High Officers” around, not many Japanese prisoners were taken..
Did the enemy show up when the Management did??
Hell no!
They were there all the time.
Our boys just didn’t seem to want to hold the enemy alive unless management was around.
Wonder what happened when it was un-official??
People and governments do things to win wars, that would be best forgotten until the next war.
Same old story but now we’re using new faces!!
Way back in World War 2 in the Pacific, if there were no “High Officers” around, not many Japanese prisoners were taken..
Did the enemy show up when the Management did??
Hell no!
They were there all the time.
Our boys just didn’t seem to want to hold the enemy alive unless management was around.
Wonder what happened when it was un-official??
People and governments do things to win wars, that would be best forgotten until the next war.
And lest we forget our many INDIAN wars..
I’ll agree, the NATIVE AMERICANS got a bad shake.
But I’ll also agree that riding around covered wagons and shooting flaming arrows into them along with scalping women and children, during a mass migration of white people, was not a very good idea either.
Some would say they were asking for it!! Who was asking for it, you may ask..
One side or the other was,, We always know someone was asking for it, and someone normally give it to the asker..
So let’s not play the innocents here, it’s somewhat unbecoming of a group of people as self righteous as we are..
Not to mention a complete waist of time.

Delta Wild Man | 11/17/2007, 3:36 pm EST

I have no idea what happened!

ray | 11/18/2007, 12:16 am EST

G.O.D. im from the south i hate slavery, i see the results of the ignorant slavers every day. If this gentlmans testimony is true whoever is behind it should be punished. The more we learn the worse this debacle gets.

Delta Wild Man | 11/18/2007, 12:45 pm EST

I see what slavery does every day
Yes, I live in the South.
And as a former “SLAVE”,Yes, I know, I’m white, but slavery knows no color, I know what I’m talking about..
It’s a pity that slavery still exist in America, I’m ashamed to even say it..

Delta Wild Man | 11/18/2007, 7:43 pm EST

g.o.d.
I see that Tim is preventing me from commenting on your post.
It’s a pity too, you could have learned so much from what I was prevented from posting.
Would have thought your parents would have taught you, but I’ll never question a parent’s right to spoil their child..

Delta Wild Man | 11/18/2007, 7:46 pm EST

By the way, I forgot to ask,
DID THE PHILIPPINE LOWER HOUSE GET OVER THAT “TERROR ATTACK” BY AL QUAIDA??

G.O.D. | 11/19/2007, 1:20 am EST

“Would have thought your parents would have taught you, but I’ll never question a parent’s right to spoil their child..”

Are you referring to the U.S. spoiling the Philippines with $92 million worth of military equipment in order to fight Islamic militants in the south of their country? Remember the Philippines were a U.S. colony between 1898 and 1946. I wouldn’t be surprised if in your mind “colony” means “child;” I’m sure you’re rooting for your “U.S. colony” of Israel to succeed (and hence, the opportunity of Americans to enslave Israelis whenever they want).

Regardless, your childlike intelligence blinds you to the fact that the Philippines was not affiliated with Al Qaeda before 9/11 to any greater extend than the United States was. Hence they are not analogous to Japanese Americans during WW2 who were affiliated with Japan by shared country(the Japanese attacked the U.S., not the U.S., British, French, Philippines or anyone else who your salivating idiocy might target for slavery).

What you seem to be saying is that if someone is the citizen of a country with any negative or positive relationship at all with Al Qaeda, then enslaving that countries’ citizens is somehow fair game. In which case you believe in enslaving U.S. citizens simply because we were attacked.

Basically, your argument is that slavery is always justified because “that‘s the way the world works.” Slavery is not how the world works. The world works by punishing people who believe in slavery, namely yourself. Lincoln had to do it during the civil war, it’s sad to think the U.S. will have to do it again because of pathetic people like you.

DirtyDennis | 11/19/2007, 8:56 am EST

GOD,

As a matter of fact, it would appear that the ‘attack’ may have been a reprisal against a former member of the Islamic resistance in the Philippines. To a certain extent, DWM may be correct in his assertion that the ‘victim’ ‘asked’ for it. It will be interesting to see what plays out and if we’re privy to the information.

Too, I don’t see DWM defending slavery, quite the opposite. I think you’re more put off by his delivery than his message. He takes some getting used to and we all deserve some slack. This is, after all, amateur hour.

I think it should be stated that this country has treated the Philippines more like a slave state than anything. After we ‘liberated’ the country from Spain, we decided they needed our ‘protection,’ and proceeded to slaughter them by the tens of thousands. I would have to guess that more Filipinos have died at the hands of Americans than from terrorists OR the Japanese. And STILL they continue to be our friend. We don’t deserve them. THEY sure as HELL don’t deserve us.

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement