Talking Points Memo | Bush’s Legacy on Voting Rights: A Story from Ohio
Go. Read. Important.
10/12/07, 8:14 pm EST
Comments
David... | 10/12/2007, 10:01 pm EST
This story has almost as much credibility as your piece on the Nafta superhighway.
So much for ethics.
DirtyDennis | 10/13/2007, 8:21 am EST
Ethics?
Hmmm, RS redirects to an article indicating a violation of ethics in one of the most sacred institutions of our country, voting, and you question RS’ ethics?
Hmmmm, and the defense of the violator of those ethics is to use racial profiling based on the conversation he had with some local folks?
Hmmm, with a public so acquiescent to such ethical violations, is it any mystery they occur?
SoootiredofstatingtheObvious | 10/13/2007, 11:04 am EST
The credibility of the bushies and the GOP is clearly evidenced by these events and countless others. The long stream of lies and confabulations has led me to the opinion that both the GOP and the bush administration should be sanctioned. Permanently.
C Co... aka I Smell Propaganda | 10/13/2007, 4:34 pm EST
Story.Not.Valid.You.Know.It.Pr op.a.gan.da.
Jed Clampett | 10/13/2007, 5:40 pm EST
it’s a convenient word to throw around when the facts on the ground don’t fit your imagination or your agenda.
DirtyDennis | 10/13/2007, 6:22 pm EST
Jed,
Propoganda — what ‘others’ say.
Truth — what you and I say.
Life is simple; life is good.
C Co... aka I Smell Propaganda | 10/14/2007, 11:21 pm EST
Interesting how you never give any benefit of the doubt to things like, oh, the 9/11 Commission Report or something a respected Army General has to say, but are so quick to believe anything from sources whose whole job it is to distort the truth to manipulate your mind.
Believing what they want to believe, regardless of silly things like facts or perspective: a shining beacon of the liberal brain.
DirtyDennis | 10/15/2007, 6:50 am EST
Kid,
Never!!??!! Are you SURE you want to stand by that assertion?
I have a difficult time connecting sneaky voter dealings in Ohio with the 9/11 Commission or a ‘respected,’ un-named army general. Please elaborate.
Dallas | 10/15/2007, 1:29 pm EST
If the story has no validity, as some say, then why is he being called before a congressional hearing?
Here’s a quote from one of the linked stories in the link:
‘”It really looked like the Civil Rights Division was used to run interference for Republican election officials in Ohio,” former voting rights section deputy chief Bob Kengle told me.’
Something smells a little fishy…
Jed Clampett | 10/15/2007, 1:45 pm EST
what he means is ‘why don’t you believe me when I tell you baseless facts like “one in five canadians has gotten medical services in the US” ‘ or similar gems designed to convince the reader to follow a losing ideology on the words of a deceiver.

Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.