Previous Next Latest

EXCLUSIVE: Bob Barr: Gonzales Should Go

3/15/07, 3:03 pm EST

To make sense of the burgeoning U.S. Attorneys scandal — in which the Department of Justice under the direction of Alberto Gonzales fired eight U.S. Attorneys for what appear to be purely political reasons — National Affairs Daily interviewed former U.S. Attorney Bob Barr, a Reagan appointee who went on to serve as a member of the House from 1995 to 2003. Barr said the conduct of the attorney general had undermined the rule of law and that Gonzales should step down.

Rolling Stone: Should Attorney General Gonzales be forced out?

Bob Barr: He should resign. This is the last straw in a whole series of — what was the name of the Lemony Snicket movie? — “Unfortunate Events” that have raised serious questions about the lack of leadership at the Department of Justice and there being too-cozy a relationship between an attorney general and the president.

RS: From what you’ve seen has there been criminal wrongdoing?

Barr: I think it’s highly improper. Not unlawful. A president can remove a U.S. Attorney for whatever reason. They serve at the pleasure of the president. But what’s happening here it’s extremely troubling because it errodes the public’s confidence in the integrity and impartiality of our federal justice system — which is perhaps the most important component of upholding the rule of law. People have to have confidence in that system that it is fair and impartial. The public has a right to know if U.S. Attorneys are in fact being fired for partisan, political reasons.

RS: Did you experience political pressures as a U.S. Attorney?

Barr: I was facing a lot of pressure when I was prosecuting a sitting member of Congress in the Atlanta area. But the Department of Justice under both Ed Meese and then Dick Thornburg made it very clear to people who were calling for my scalp that as long as the U.S. attorney is proceeding with a legitimate prosecution, we’re not going to stop it, or speed it up, or slow it down depending on political considerations or political pressures.

RS: What do you make of this talking point that “Clinton did this too.”

Barr: I and a number of others were critical of president Clinton when he first came into office and almost immediately removed all U.S. Attorneys. But that’s not the same thing as what’s happening now.

We’re seeing a president in his second term go after U.S. attorneys of his own party for reasons that are clearly political: not moving fast enough against targets on the other side of the aisle, succumbing to pressure from Senators for example. That is very, very corrosive, both to morale for U.S. Attorneys as well as in terms of reducing the confidence that the public has that the system is fair and impartial and non-partisan.


Previous Next Latest

Comments

Rustin | 3/15/2007, 10:46 pm EST

It’s hard to believe, and this is just 1 of the couple dozen practically impeachable things Bush and Co. has done. To me, this isn’t a thing where we should talk about who has done it in the past(Clinton), we should be talking about how to stop it from happening again.

If people don’t start realizing that Left and Right have nothing to do with this, and that our Government needs to be motified ASAP, the United States as a nation will not last much longer.

Let Them Eat Cake | 3/16/2007, 12:59 am EST

This is not to be compared with presidents who fired U.S. attorneys when first in office and wanting the same Party to have the jobs.(That is standard procedure).

This is firing other Republicans because they did not allow themselves to be pressured into trying to find “crimes” on the opponent political Party when there wasn’t any…That is GooseBump Time…

Gonzales lying under oath…Sound familiar?

How many Dirty Scandals does the Republican Party have hidden under the rug? How many this week?…

These incompetents have been playing fast and loose with the Rule of Law…

Impeachment, Please! The whole —-administration…Gonzales needs to Resign…

What else are they hiding and ‘ole Harriet Meirs was the Fall Guy and who is next? Unreal!

Capitalist Pig | 3/16/2007, 6:47 am EST

Funny Clinton fired 93 out 94 U.S. attorneys and it was no big deal. Yet another example of hypocrisy in action.

charles odell | 3/16/2007, 12:32 pm EST

How could Gonzales and company have
been so stupid as to not see that
this action would raise a huge
stink ? Bush should fire the lot
for his own protection . Then
again, they do fit into an
administration that excels in
shooting off its own fingers and
toes.

Alberto | 3/16/2007, 3:13 pm EST

Gonzales is a ass clown!

Word 1 | 3/17/2007, 4:46 am EST

“Funny Clinton fired 93 out 94 U.S. attorneys and it was no big deal. Yet another example of hypocrisy in action.”

A cute Rove talking point. Problem is that these attorneys are republican appointees who are being fired for things like prosecuting corrupt-as-shit congressman like Randy Duke Cunningham. Or being fired for things like not going after democratic “voter fraud” which is code for not supressing poor and minority votes with enough fervor.

If this administration really believed its own excuses it would have come up with believable ones. That the attorneys were not effective managers is utterly wrong. Again, it’s the cover up that fucks you.

Dr. Ralph | 3/17/2007, 5:18 pm EST

Yeah… if W only had Clinton’s foresight he would have just bagged all the attorney generals and hired puppets to begin with. NOW it looks bad. I guess if he had Billy-Bob’s experience with the gray areas of law he would have known. Live and learn! Betcha Hillary wouldn’t make that mistake…

Let Them Eat Cake | 3/17/2007, 11:47 pm EST

How sad that the “The Doctor” lives in the past and, seems to Invoke Clinton no matter what the current administration does to break the law, misrepresent the people of our Country.

Most people realize we were much better off with Clinton…Why Ralph seems to delude himself that Now is O.K., is beyond reason or logic…

Start doing what the Republicans claim they are all about and, Accept Responsibility for Bush’s failed policies and failed “leadership”. The evidence is Current and All around you…

lik roper | 3/20/2007, 4:02 pm EST

that moustache should go too!

Dr. Ralph | 3/26/2007, 5:32 pm EST

Damn likroper… it’s gone. You’re good!

Tinfoil Hat | 4/15/2007, 2:25 am EST

Cap and Doc,
Thought I’d copy you on my message to C.Co in a latter post. Maybe this’ll clear it up?

Once again you have bought the Republican “talking points” without utilizing your critical thinking abilities. Yes, Clinton did fire almost all the attorneys, but he did it when he came into office. This is the normal procedure. Also, all his replacements did require congressional oversight. Since Bush and Co, snuck their Attorney replacement provision into the Patriot Act (I wonder how many other hidden provisions exist in there?) the Bush action was to fire the attorneys in the middle of their term, and attempt to replace them with cronies WITHOUT congressional approval. Emails uncovered (those that haven’t been destroyed) show convincingly that the reasons for these firings are purely political in nature (as is anything “MC Rove” is a party to). The “Justice” department is now self destructing because they all know that this is true, but are put into a position where they need to cover up. The irony here is that if this had happened before the last election, we probably wouldn’t even know about it. This scandal is part of a predominant pattern for this administration who will surely go down in history as one of the most corrupt EVER.

Qpspxjjr | 7/13/2009, 3:11 pm EST

IZ723F

Post A Comment

Caution: Off-topic comments will be deleted

Name:

Comments:



Advertisement

Advertisement