I believe this means Coulter hearts unitary power during war time.

Does she agree with everything Nixon did? Because it’s all so similar to Bush’s actions and reactions to all of the media’s dissent he’s been receiving. She notices that the same ‘treason’ that appeared during Vietnam, a time period in which Nixon was President for a majority of, is reappearing in this war. Hasn’t this country already seen that we had no business in that war? Clearly, the majority of this nation is beginning to realize that we’re fighting the wrong guys. The reason this treason culture didn’t exist during World War II was because we had a reason to go in. We did go after the right guys that time, and there weren’t really any doubts about whether or not we were doing things correctly. The Geneva Convention relative to Prisoners of War wasn’t even established until 1949 and 1950. We didn’t question POW’s rights because there was nothing to base them on. Has she forgotten that? Or does she imagine it existed prior to the war, just like she imagines the Constitution allows the President to become a dictator during wartime?

I’m surprised Ann Coulter can even talk with that giant adams apple.

The Geneva convention states that “should doubt exist as to whether an individual is a lawful combatant (none held at GITMO), noncombatant or unlawful combatant (most are unlawful per definition of the Geneva conventions), will be held in accordance with Geneva Prisoner of War Conventions (which they are being held) until status is determined (most have not). The capturing nation must convene a competent tribunal to determine person’s status (attempts to do so have been blocked). I don’t think it can get much simpler than that. I wonder how we get so concerned about foreign fighters who for the most part would love to kill you as soon as someone feels sorry for them and takes up their cause. Really are we really happy that the Supreme Court agreed that Osama’s personal driver have rights? I thought everyone was concerned the President was appointing conservitive judges. I am not an Ann Coulter fan, but i can see why she would be a bit upset.

A lot of these prisoners were sold to us. Many are innocent of wrongdoing. Yes, I feel sorry for them, as would any thinking person.

As to Coulter, I think they have the right idea at buffalobeast.com …

“Reading Coulter’s work in order to refute it is as pointless as covering your face in shit just so you can wipe it off. You don’t have to do research to dismiss Ann Coulter. You don’t argue with a street lunatic; you just keep walking. But instead of having the good sense to reserve their energies for people who could possibly be taken seriously, liberals exhaust their outrage on a cartwheeling rodeo clown whose sole purpose is to draw more and more negative attention from these self-same liberals.”

If someone were jailed mistakenly, then they will be released, 100s’ have to date. Are there innoncent people at GITMO, perhaps a few. Way more in the US prison system and as a “Thinking person” i do feel sorry for them. Like i said, does anyone feel sorry for the foreign fighters and Osama’s personal driver…..the answer is still no, as unlawful combatants they do not deserve the full protections and rights of the Geneva conventions articles for lawful combatants, that is for fighters of recognized governments who openly wear uniforms or are led by a commander who is directed by a goverment.

There were lots of Americans who were against WWII as well (not to mention WWI), but you didn’t have a national media covering it all. The government had a lot more control of the media back then. It is called propaganda, and governments have used it forever.

Coulter and her lame comments re. “Democrats in sympathy with bin Laden” had better look at how well bin Landen’s “threats” seem to work for the Bush administration.

Just when the Country is aware of the lies and motivations(Oil, greed, power) that led to the Bush-”war” on Iraq, bin Laden is telling us how “important Al Qaeda’s No. 2 was” -crediting Bush in a strange sense.(It only took five years and the devastation of a country not involved in 9/11…..

bin Laden’s “warnings” seem to pop up only when Bush and his administration have been caught with their hands in the proverbial “cookie jar” again and again.

Coulter seems to ignore the “Timely Warnings” and the attempts to boost Bush’s saggy polls……

i think Ann has it backwards again….no one loves Bin Laden more than the Bush War Machine. where would they be without their favorite super-vallain? every time the anti-war talk gets loud enough to drown out their spin–another “Bin Laden Tape” magically appears on “Al Jazeera” to scare us all back in line. it works nicely around elections, too.

Ann Coulter hits it on the nail. Democrats are so busy being caught up in doint whatever they can to get back congress. First, they demand action from Bush and Congress. Then, when action is delivered on a silver platter, they moan and whine about it being a political stunt, and that they would have done better. What a party of goofballs.

Ann Coulter is white neo-nazi trash. Need anyone else say anything more?

Dan,

By the way, Danny, boy, no body loves Bin Laden and terrorists more than rightwingers and the Republican Party. This way you can sew eternal fear in Americans, run up huge profits for the Military Industrial Complex, and maintain an iron grip on Presidential, Congressional, and Judicial power.

Uh, Ann, knock, knock, wake up! Didn’t your georgie-boy fly all of the Bin Laden’s out of the U.S. immediately after 911 instead of having the FBI question them? How obvious is that? NOW who’s siding with
Bin Laden? Try and turn everything around, same ol same ol from the repub right wack jobs

Please join me in Christian prayer each and every night as we pray for Ann Coulter to die slowly from bone cancer.