.

Pharrell Williams and Will.i.am Settle Trademark Lawsuit

Pop stars reach mutual understanding over I Am Other and I.Am.Symbolic brand dispute

Pharrell, Will.i.am.
Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images; Kevin Mazur/Child11/WireImage
March 11, 2014 3:15 PM ET

Pop stars Pharrell Williams and will.i.am have settled their legal differences in a trademark dispute, while also tackling some of life's Big Questions about identity and just who they are. Last year, Williams attempted to trademark the name of his "creative venture and way of life" I Am Other. The Black Eyed Peas frontman objected and sought legal action against the "Happy" singer, saying that people could confuse Williams' company with will.i.am's I.Am.Symbolic company. While Williams subsequently sought a declaratory judgment of trademark noninfringement, The Hollywood Reporter notes that the prickly pair has settled its differences.

Pharrell Williams and Oscars 2014's 25 Best and Worst Moments

Williams' original argument in his lawsuit was that the Black Eyed Peas artist's mark was too generic. "The I Am Other mark means 'I am something else,' leaving what that 'else' is to the imagination of the consumer," his paperwork said. "It certainly does not mean 'I am Will' or in any way suggest defendants' or the will.i.am mark."

Furthermore, he also claimed that will.i.am would have a hard time proving that he controlled the "I Am" trademark, considering the existence of a certain Dr. Seuss character who has had an unusual and inexplicable predilection for green eggs and ham since 1960. Williams also cited 146 artists who use the "I Am" construction in their monikers, including I Am Virgin, I Am Ghost and I Am Band.

Will.i.am countered by saying Williams did not respect intellectual property, claiming that not only was the "Happy" singer involved in Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines" lawsuit with the estate of Marvin Gaye, but also cofounded a record label called Star Trak Entertainment.

Ultimately, the two pop stars are settling out of court. Last June, Williams told Rolling Stone he thought the whole case was "ridiculous." "I am disappointed that Will, a fellow artist, would file a case against me," he said. "I am someone who likes to talk things out and, in fact, I attempted to do just that on many occasions."

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here

prev
Music Main Next

blog comments powered by Disqus
Around the Web
Powered By ZergNet
Daily Newsletter

Get the latest RS news in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the Rolling Stone newsletter and special offers from RS and its
marketing partners.

X

We may use your e-mail address to send you the newsletter and offers that may interest you, on behalf of Rolling Stone and its partners. For more information please read our Privacy Policy.

Song Stories

“Long Walk Home”

Bruce Springsteen | 2007

When the subject of this mournful song returns home, he hardly recognizes his town. Springsteen told Rolling Stone the alienation the man feels is a metaphor for life in a politically altered post-9/11 America. “Who would have ever thought we’d live in a country without habeas corpus?” he said. “That’s Orwellian. That’s what political hysteria is about and how effective it is. I felt it in myself. You get frightened for your family, for your home. And you realize how countries can move way off course, very far from democratic ideals.”

More Song Stories entries »
 
www.expandtheroom.com