.

Pearl Jam to Mark 20th Anniversary With Neil Young

Band will play both nights of Young's annual Bridge School Benefit concert in October

August 24, 2010 2:44 PM ET

Come October, Pearl Jam will have officially been a band for 20 years. They'll celebrate at a familiar event: Neil Young's annual Bridge School Benefit concert, happening October 23rd and 24th. Pearl Jam have played the concert, which helps children with severe physical impairments and complex communication needs, eight times before. "It's perfect [for the anniversary]: not too blown up," guitarist Stone Gossard [tells Billboard ]. "It's not about us, it's about all those kids that are on stage with you, and about Neil Young and his commitment, his influence." Pearl Jam first performed live as "Mookie Blaylock" on October 22nd, 1990, at Seattle's Off Ramp.


Photos: Neil Young's Bridge School Benefit 2009


Only Neil Young and Pearl Jam are confirmed for this year's shows, which will likely be held once again at Mountain View, California's Shoreline Amphitheatre. Pearl Jam will perform both nights, according to Antiquiet. The band have had plans to reissue their entire discography in time for the anniversary, but so far they've only re-released their 1991 debut, Ten.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here

prev
Music Main Next
Around the Web
Powered By ZergNet
Daily Newsletter

Get the latest RS news in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the Rolling Stone newsletter and special offers from RS and its
marketing partners.

X

We may use your e-mail address to send you the newsletter and offers that may interest you, on behalf of Rolling Stone and its partners. For more information please read our Privacy Policy.

Song Stories

“You Oughta Know”

Alanis Morissette | 1995

This blunt, bitter breakup song -- famous for its line "Would she go down on you in a theater?" -- was long rumored to be about Alanis Morissette getting dumped by Full House actor Dave Coulier. But while she never confirmed it was about him (Coulier himself says it is, however), she insisted the song wasn't all about scorn. "By no means is this record just a sexual, angry record," she told Rolling Stone. "The song wasn't written for the sake of revenge. It was written for the sake of release. I'm actually a pretty rational, calm person."

More Song Stories entries »
 
www.expandtheroom.com