Napster Injunction Rewritten

Labels, publishers and artists must submit titles for Napster to block

March 7, 2001 12:00 AM ET

Metallica won't have to worry about Napster anymore -- at least in theory. As was widely expected, a California judge revised her injunction against the file-sharing service on March 6th, ordering the company to halt the exchange of copyrighted MP3s.

The injunction, written by Judge Marilyn Patel, requires artists and labels and music publishers to give Napster the following information about each track they want blocked: the name of the artist, the name of the song, the name of the file and certification that the person making the request owns or controls the copyright.

Still, there are loopholes. Napster's wiliest users have already tried to undermine the new system by renaming their MP3s using deliberate misspellings. The day the injunction was issued, you could find Metallica's "Unforgiven" if you searched under "Matalica", and "Hey Jude" by searching for "Beetles." The injunction requires Napster and the labels to "use reasonable measures in identifying variations of the filename(s)," but the ability to do that will likely hinge on how crafty Napster users get. On the site's message boards, users have been suggesting elaborate numerical codes and other schemes for foiling the new system.

Meanwhile, Napster intended to mount a new appeal and had scheduled a March 9th mediation session with the labels, to discuss whether they might be able to reach an agreement out of court.

To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here

Music Main Next
Around the Web
Powered By ZergNet
Daily Newsletter

Get the latest RS news in your inbox.

Sign up to receive the Rolling Stone newsletter and special offers from RS and its
marketing partners.


We may use your e-mail address to send you the newsletter and offers that may interest you, on behalf of Rolling Stone and its partners. For more information please read our Privacy Policy.

Song Stories

“You Oughta Know”

Alanis Morissette | 1995

This blunt, bitter breakup song -- famous for its line "Would she go down on you in a theater?" -- was long rumored to be about Alanis Morissette getting dumped by Full House actor Dave Coulier. But while she never confirmed it was about him (Coulier himself says it is, however), she insisted the song wasn't all about scorn. "By no means is this record just a sexual, angry record," she told Rolling Stone. "The song wasn't written for the sake of revenge. It was written for the sake of release. I'm actually a pretty rational, calm person."

More Song Stories entries »