.

Lethal Weapon 3

Mel Gibson, Danny Glover, Joe Pesci, Rene Russo, Stuart Wilson

Directed by Richard Donner
Rolling Stone: star rating
5 0
Community: star rating
5 0 0
May 15, 1992

There's a reason for calling this brand-name sequel mindless entertainment. If you think about what you just wasted two hours watching, you won't be entertained anymore. Lethal Weapon 3 offers mediocrity wielded by experts. It's not a movie, it's a machine. Why a third time? The first movie earned $65 million, and the second more than doubled that. End of discussion.

Mel Gibson is back as Martin Riggs, the cop who was suicidal over his wife's death in part 1 but has become just a laughably nutso eccentric. Gibson looks great, which by now is all that's necessary, besides showing up. Danny Glover also returns as Riggs's detective partner, Roger Murtaugh, the family man who is willing to provide Riggs with a home away from home. Gibson (The Year of Living Dangerously) can be a good actor, and Glover (To Sleep With Anger) is a great one, but you can't blame them for performing on automatic pilot. Anything else might disturb the equilibrium.

Director Richard Donner (a three-time Weapon veteran) and screenwriters Jeffrey Boam and Robert Mark Kamen don't even bother to sketch in the rudiments of a story. Okay, Murtaugh is supposed to be a week away from retirement, and Riggs doesn't want him to leave the force. But that's not a plot; it's an excuse. Lethal Weapon 3 plays like a collection of highlight scenes — the ones you see in trailers or on Siskel and Ebert. There's no connective tissue. Riggs and Murtaugh appear and in seconds the shooting starts or a building blows up or somebody gets fucked — literally or figuratively.

Joe Pesci returns from part 2 as the peroxided, peewee-voiced Mob accountant Leo Getz, who has gone semi-straight but is still a butt for jokes. Rene Russo is a new face as internal-affairs officer Lorna Cole, who proves a match for Riggs in the martial and bedroom arts. The scene in which they strip to show each other their battle scars has been done before (remember Jaws?), but not in a Lethal Weapon movie. Mel doesn't go bare assed — he stops at the briefs. Sorry for spoiling the film's one surprise.

Will the obvious emptiness of this enterprise butt business? Will the recent L.A. riots make audiences less likely to cheer two members of the LAPD wreaking havoc on the streets? Will the studio think twice about putting another chapter in the works? Hell, no. On its opening weekend alone, Lethal Weapon 3 took in a whopping $33.2 million, a gross exceeded only by Batman's first weekend. Even a cynical Hollywood player like Griffin Mill couldn't have planned it better.

prev
Movie Review Main Next

ADD A COMMENT

Community Guidelines »
loading comments

loading comments...

COMMENTS

Sort by:
    Read More

    Movie Reviews

    More Reviews »
    Daily Newsletter

    Get the latest RS news in your inbox.

    Sign up to receive the Rolling Stone newsletter and special offers from RS and its
    marketing partners.

    X

    We may use your e-mail address to send you the newsletter and offers that may interest you, on behalf of Rolling Stone and its partners. For more information please read our Privacy Policy.

    Song Stories

    “1999”

    Prince | 1982

    “I don’t consider myself a great poet,” Prince told Rolling Stone. “I just know I’m here to say what’s on my mind.” In the case of the apocalyptic party anthem “1999,” he was worried about then-president Ronald Reagan’s foreign policies. The song’s melody is based on a riff borrowed from the Mamas and Papas’ “Monday, Monday,” and Prince originally envisioned the first verse with three-part harmony but later split the vocals between himself and members of the Revolution. Because Warner Bros., with whom Prince was locked in a contractual battle, owned the original’s masters, Prince rerecorded the song and appropriately released that version in 1999.

    More Song Stories entries »