It's official. With a staggering drop of 67% from last week, Watchmen, bedeviled by mixed reviews, a punishing running time of nearly three hours and an ad campaign that seems to freeze out audiences who don't know or give a damn about the Alan Moore comic book, took in a scant $18 million compared to last weekend's solid-but-not-sensational $55 million. Translation: the blockbuster train has left the station. To add insult to box-office injury, Watchmen got whacked by The Rock, the former wrestler who now goes by his thespian name of Dwayne Johnson. The weapon The Rock (excuse me, Mr. Johnson) used to pound Watchmen is a puny Disney adventure flick called Race to Witch Mountain, a chunk of family pablum that took in $25 million. Disney reports that 18% of the audience consisted of adults NOT attending with children, a factoid that scares me deeply. Get a life, people. Or at least a better movie. Couldn't you have joined the folks at Sunshine Cleaning, which did surprisingly well in a limited run? Hell, there was more action watching Jon Stewart ambush CNBC's financial guru Jim Cramer on Comedy Central than you'll find in all of Witch Mountain. More point as well. But the question remains: Who really whacked Watchmen? The movie's enemies accuse director Zack Snyder of arrogance in going his own dark way. Supporters say audience taste is currently so debased that anything smart and/or ambitious scares away the escapist-hungry public. What's your final verdict?
Box-Office Casualty Report: The Rock Rolls Over the Watchmen
March 16, 2009 3:45 PM

Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.
Sal Paradise | March 20, 2009 4:04 PM
Watchmen failing had nothing to do with being complicated. It was actually dumbed down for the american audience, and that kept away the loyal fans. Most of the people who went the opening weekend thought it would be a neat superhero flick for the kids thanks to deceptive marketing. Here's an idea everyone: try picking up a book and reading once in a while. its good for the brain. That includes you, Mr. Snyder.
not either or | March 18, 2009 3:37 PM
Multiple factors are probably responsible for this state of movie going affairs. Sure, the tastes of the population might be a bit wanting and Snyder has a lot to learn about creating tension in a scene.
I think the biggest problem is the perception of the movie by the majority of people. To the ignorant, it looks like a grade B superhero movie. Imagine you are the average TV watcher and you see a commercial for this movie. The costumes are not unified, and things are not quite as flashy as what you expect from superhero blockbusters, it's rated R and there isn't a simple single character plot with a famous Hollywood name to make things easy for you. You have no idea what it's about and nor do you care.
That is the biggest reason for it's modest turnout. It has everything to do with the commercials and little to do with the actual movie.
Bo | March 17, 2009 5:18 PM
I don't care for these numbers. Since I read the book, I am looking forward for the movie (hitting my cinema in a few days), I am not expecting a better experience than I had with the book, but I love the bold choices authors of the film made, making it R-rated, casting that interesting actor as Rorschach etc., these are all things the film deserves to be watched for. I couldn't care less for what the majority of Americans watch.
Shamrock | March 17, 2009 4:53 PM
The problem with Watchmen was it was too smart for it's own good. Most movie goers are morons. Snyder chose not to dumb it down for conventional audiences so that it'd be easier for them to swallow.
Mazzy | March 17, 2009 4:15 PM
I LOVED Watchmen and saw it twice. Remember that the first Velvet Underground Album with the Warhol Banana Cover sold only 6000 copies when it was released but is one of the most influencial rock albums.
If 2001 A Space Odyssey were released today, American Audiences would fall asleep. They are so lame and inpatient.
Ash | March 17, 2009 3:18 PM
Alan Moore never saw the film- he hates it the same reason he hates all movies based on his comic books because he feels that the whole point of the graphic novel genre is to do what neither film nor the written word can do. I collected comic books as a kid too, and never heard of Watchmen. I don't think that is an indictment upon Watchmen, but rather our tastes. I read it a couple months ago and was shocked at how good it was and have no idea how I missed it. The film wasn't a substitute for the comic book, but it was really really good. Snyder didn't compromise and he gets big props. The movie had its failings, but it was engaging and didn't pander. I guess its drop off in the second week has something to do with an audience that desires escapism, but also some level of confusion on what exactly it is- if I hadn't read the comic, I'd be confused as well. I think both the comic and the eventual DVD release of this film will do pretty well in the long run though, once the public catches up to it.
pzak | March 17, 2009 11:13 AM
A more insightful director could have made a Watchmen adaptation to rival the brilliance and success of The Dark Knight. If Watchmen had been reviewed as a must-see, this weekend's number would have been different. The mediocre response from both fans and critics crippled it's appeal to anyone besides true enthusiasts.
Chris Price | March 16, 2009 10:56 PM
Look, a LOT of people were not confident about this movie's chances. And a large percentage of the general public had no idea what this story is about. So all they have to go on is word of mouth and critics' reviews. Well, guess what? Poor word of mouth and extremely mixed reviews led most people to simply say "meh" to this film and validate all of the uncertainty industry people have had about it. Watchmen pulled in the fanboys for weekend one, but what it didn't have going in was strong reviews and an exciting buzz around it (like Dark Knight did). So most people's attitude is "maybe I'll check it out at some point in the theater, or maybe I'll just wait for Netflix".
Carlos | March 16, 2009 9:57 PM
I think there were a lot of people who didn't know what the hell kind of movie they were going to see when they bought tickets to Watchmen. There were numerous familes and older couples leaving the theatre during the sex scenes. I am pretty sure they were expecting a Spider Man type film. Didn't they see the rating?
Max | March 16, 2009 8:44 PM
What killed Watchmen wasn't anything other than being what it was. Watchmen is not a story that lends itself well to film. It can't be re-imagined and retain its integrity, nor can it be dumbed down for the same reason. There isn't a series of origin stories that can be cherry picked into a movie version, nor is there a central narrative voice that carries the story from start to finish. Instead you have a series of participants and view points for the end of the world as it is known. It sounds compelling on paper and Snyder did a masterful job of acting on the story's integrity, but the moving parts of the story itself cannot be so easily plied to the big screen. Watchmen is an art-house comic, but could it haven been made as an art house movie?
No, because even fewer people would have seen it.
Seth | March 16, 2009 7:37 PM
Sorry I think that Watchmen's failure is it's own fault. I collected comics for years and I have never heard of Watchmen. Yet now I'm supposed to clear 3 hours of a Saturday to watch a movie about... what IS it about anyway? Forget about bringing the kids to something that long and violent.It doesn't help that the writer of the comic book hates the movie so much he didn't want his name attached, saying Watchmen worked better as a mini-series (which I suspect they will still do). Witch Mountain however, I grew up on. I know what it's about. The kids will probably love it, or at least not be scared by it. I'm sure this is what people were thinking this weekend.
Ryan | March 16, 2009 5:00 PM
I think that Dr. Manhatten needs to cock-slap the American public with his big blue wiener for being so stupid! We all know that the 18% of adults who saw "Witch Mountain" without children look at "Watchmen" and they know it's too complicated for them. They have to, otherwise why not go? Not perfect, but certainly has more rational thought than the trash that came out this weekend. The general public, who go to this drool to escape their financial problems or what have them, are afraid to see a movie that challenges them to take a good hard look at the world they live in. They'd rather see Kevin James bum around on a motorized scooter than see a dark, story-heavy film about miscast superheroes. *sigh*