These Monday box-office reports seem to be playing the same news on a continuous loop. Once again, The Dark Knight kills the competition. In its third week, Batman squeaked past the mucho-hyped debut of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor to win the No. One spot. It's $42.5 million for the Mummy, $43.8 million for the Bat. Of course, Tomb should be entombed by next week when word of mouth kicks in about how tired and stupid the third Mummy flick is. The Dark Knight, now nearing $400 million at the ticket windows will still be raking it in. As it should. The triumph of the summer's best live-action movie brings up a crucial acting question that needs the asking:
After Heath Ledger, who has already achieved film immortality as the Joker, who gives the best performance in The Dark Knight?
My answer, with all due to respect to the Batman/Bruce Wayne of Christian Bale, is Aaron Eckhart. His portrayal of the heroic district attorney Harvey Dent sticks with you long after you leave the theater. Eckhart earns major props for scarily and movingly portraying the DA's transformation into the dreaded Harvey Two-Face. It's Harvey who tells the Caped Crusader, "You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become a villain." In the hospital scene, with the Joker in nurse drag at Harvey's bed, we watch a good man being driven to the dark side. Ledger provides the scene's flash, but it's Eckhart who grounds it in human feeling. What we're watching is Harvey's humanity being erased. And we see it all in Eckhart's face. It's a great performance, up there with Eckhart's best screen work in In the Company of Men, Thank You for Smoking, the upcoming Towelhead and a 2005 film Eckhart did with Helena Bonham Carter called Conversations with Other Women. Few saw it, so get busy.
And get busy arguing with me over what you think is Eckhart's best work and who gives the 2nd best performance in The Dark Knight.

Email
Stumble
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!

- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2009 All Media Guide, LLC.
Coulter | August 8, 2008 11:42 PM
The Dark Knight stands as THE overpraised movie of the year. Maybe people are just too afraid not to like it (or to say they do) with Ledger's death and all. If you have to see one movie about a billionaire industrialist moonlighting at a costumed vigilante this summer, Iron Man is more fun, intelligent, and morally interesting (yes, it is). But as to which is the second best performance, gotta go with Gary Oldman. And Dan nailed it: Maggie Gyllenhaal may be the better actress, but at least Katie Holmes has the decency of being somewhat attractive. Plus MG was charmless and not at all unique. When the Joker took her out, I didn't even bat an eye.
Jack | August 8, 2008 10:42 AM
First, let me say WOW. The Joker, are you kidding me??? Complete transformation for Ledger, truly a performance for the ages. Second place in my opinion goes to Bale, hands down. Very deep and rich character in subtle ways. He plays asshole, lovestruck, stoic, and essentially an obsessed madman (for the public better) in the same movie. I do agree that Eckhart did a great job as Two Face though...maybe we should just flip a coin to decide.
Nathan | August 7, 2008 12:31 PM
The award for second best performance in The Dark Knight goes to: Aaron Eckhart.
JRL | August 7, 2008 11:52 AM
Dan,
I agree 100% with your assessment of Maggie Gyllenhaal. I think Anthony Michael Hall had more charisma, and he was in the movie for, what, 15 seconds?
austin | August 7, 2008 2:09 AM
it takes the most basic brain to know that when morgan freeman has a role in a movie, the movie will be great. so with that morgan freeman takes the cake. eat it f*%*ers
Chris | August 6, 2008 9:14 PM
"well this is a movie - not a comic"
yeh well the movie is based off the comic...if they had him acting all nice and blue collar after he got his face burned then that would be a total injustice to the actual two face character...besides, if he started to lose it when he was still harvey then why would he go back to being sane?? do u think u would start to lose it and then realize half ur face is burned and then go back to being nice?
Nick Bridwell, TX | August 6, 2008 9:07 PM
I wish I could copy and paste my review of the movie from the original post on Travers' review ....but I"m lazy so yeah: Eckhart ..but not as the second best I think he was bar none the best performance..
E! | August 6, 2008 7:46 PM
I know this is the whole point of blogging, but can I ask just one question?
Why does someone have to be best, or second best all the f*&%ing time?
It's only opinion - no words one can write will change someone else's, nor should they. I thought Bale's performance, as usual, had great depth, but no one out there would agree with me that his performance rivals Ledgers.
So with that in mind, can't we go back to the old days where we just made fun of Rolling Stone for being so hopelessly out of touch most of the time.
the man | August 6, 2008 6:11 PM
def. give it to gary oldman...... he is an actor whose ability knows no bounds
Josh | August 6, 2008 4:19 PM
I would give the nod to Gary Oldman. I realize that his character requires less versatility as an actor, but Oldman nailed it in The Dark Knight. If I hadn't seen the trailer a google of times, I would have never suspected that he actually lived through his fake death. I also thought that he really brought together the end of the film.
One poster mentioned it and these were my thoughts. Eckhart was a great Harvey Dent. He was charasmatic, seemed to have that golden boy, blue collar ethic in a white collar profession. But, to me, he was average as Two-Face. I'm not sure if I was too visually stunned by his appearance to study the portrayal enough, but I thought he was average to slightly above as Two-Face.
I'd give the nod to Oldman.
miles64 | August 6, 2008 4:06 PM
What I hear a lot of folks saying (and I tend to agree) is that as good as The Dark Knight is, perhaps it has been overhyped by critics leading to slight disappointment when you actually see it. Case in Point: I saw the X-files movie the day after The Dark Knight and found that I enjoyed it as much as The Dark Knight, mainly because I didn't have to worry if it was living up to the hype. The negative reviews it received freed me to enjoy the movie on its own terms without elevated expectations.
Anonymous | August 6, 2008 3:07 PM
eric roberts... great to see him back in form.
GU$ | August 6, 2008 2:39 AM
Eckhart was a great Dent but i didn''t think he was a great two face. As with Bale who I think is an amazing Bruce Wayne but doesn't shine as Batman although this is difficult to do with the character. For me the second best performance is Michael Cain as Alfred, he plays the character very well.
dave | August 6, 2008 2:33 AM
"And then he gets even more intense right when he actually gets his face burned because thats what happens in the comics."
well this is a movie - not a comic.
V.No | August 6, 2008 2:25 AM
Did anyone else think the "burned half" of Dent's face rip off mummy from the 1st "The Mummy" movie?
Chris | August 5, 2008 10:55 PM
Um first off Joker77, Roberts played Sal Maroni and not Carmine Falcone...and Arsalan i don't kno if you watched the same movie as me honestly...Don't you remember the scene when he almost shoots the guy from Arkham? He wasn't two face yet but he was showing that he was starting to lose it. And then he gets even more intense right when he actually gets his face burned because thats what happens in the comics. He doesn't become two face and then gradually turn evil, he instantly starts to kill people. So please complain about Eckhart's performance(which was amazing) all you want but don't start complaining about the writing unless you actually know a thing about Batman.
Egor | August 5, 2008 7:38 PM
Gary Oldman was great, up there with his best in Sid & Nancy and Leon: The Proffesional I'm glad that he gets mentioned a couple of times on this board. All the performances were good. The transformation of Dent was rushed but Eckhart did good with what he was given. But the line "you live (shows bright side of coin)...you DIIEE(shows burned side of coin) was cheesy, but he was still good.
John Doe | August 5, 2008 5:31 PM
Are the rumors true? Is Two-face still alive?
John Debono | August 5, 2008 5:12 PM
To me The Dark Knight 2nd best performance is something Two Face would have to decide between Christian Bale and Aaron Eckhart. Bale's performance is the most difficult to pull off, a man who has to hide his emotions from just about everyone for what he believes is the greater good. To call his performance weak or underdeveloped is like saying that about Al Pacino in Godfather 2.
And if Bale is Michael Corolone, Eckhart is Fredo. A man with a heart of gold that is corrupted by the world around them and the pain it has brought him. The scene where he watches the building explode is one of the film's most heartbreaking moments.
Ledger is the show of The Dark Knight but Bale and Eckhart gives the film it's heart
Joker77 | August 5, 2008 5:11 PM
I actually, to my surprise, liked Eric Roberts as Falcone. He has one of the funniest lines in the movie when Batman throws him off the fire escape and asks if the Joker has friends and Roberts replies: "Friends, have you seen this guy?" His faces he makes and is just slimy in general. It was a suprisingly good performance.
Arsalan | August 5, 2008 5:09 PM
Guys, I seriously don't understand all the hype around Eckhart's performance. To be fair to Eckhart, I thought Dent was a pretty poorly written character, particularly post-transformation. The dude went from squeeky clean goody-two shoes to crazed villain in less than two minutes of screen time, and did an unconvincing job at that.
Gary Oldman all the way, followed by Caine and Gyllenhal.
miles64 | August 5, 2008 5:04 PM
Is it true that there will not be another sequel?
anon | August 5, 2008 3:40 PM
i liked aaron eckhart as harvey dent but not so much as two-face.
hoel | August 5, 2008 3:00 PM
I think you just have to give it all to the story. All of the actors worked in service of the story, which was really terrific, probably the best super hero MOVIE ever made. Everything tied into everything else and there were very few false notes. The fact that each actor executed exactly what was required of them is probably testament to the director more than anything else.
dan | August 5, 2008 2:56 PM
maggie gyllenhaal is so ugly in this it's a shame and it stains the rest of the movie. they should have cast her to play the joker... with no make up. heath ledger would've made a prettier girl
Chris | August 5, 2008 2:41 PM
I too thought that Eckhart was amazing as both Harvey and 2 face...the scene when he kidnaps Gordon's family was the scariest scene of the movie IMHO. While the Joker was terrifying there was always something he did to make you laugh, and the same can't be said about 2 face. About to shoot a little kid without giving a care is just plain badass. And btw, the cgi was amazing, he looked exactly like 2 face from Long Halloween, read that comic before you go saying he looked like crap.
Philbee | August 5, 2008 2:21 PM
Sorry, but that Two-Face zombie make-up/effect was way too much. It distracted from the acting. Gary Oldman was outstanding. Glad he had more to chew on this film. What happened to the look of the film? Where was the Narrows? The ghetto Blade Runner area that gave the original film it's look?
Mjonasen | August 5, 2008 1:23 PM
Clearly Gary Oldman and like usual completely ignored. many probably forgot who he was or didnt remember...the Gordon role was alot different than what we usually see him play. But like the few of us who are lucky to have followed his career the guy can do anything.
Kevin | August 5, 2008 12:53 PM
Bale's Batman goes behind the ever-prepared, stoic super-hero archetype and into the realm of a confused young man trapped in a nightmare of his own design. You can see the idealism fade from his eyes in the Maroni interrogation scene. You can feel his heart break when he kisses Rachel goodbye before he means to turn himself in. You can sense the dread as Alfred tells him Joker is a man that can't be understood. Bale has won the uphill battle of turning Batman into a person, not an icon (albeit a touch more subtly than Ledger's Joker). I pick Bale above Eckhart simply because the path of turning Batman human seems infinitely more labyrinthine than Dent's flop from light to dark.
Lola | August 5, 2008 12:49 PM
it was def eckhart. he's so talented and has awesome indie cred and its so nice so see him doing what he does best in a blockbuster movie. i can't wait to see him in the next batman.
EvilMulder | August 5, 2008 12:18 PM
Eckart, all the way. I LOVE Oldman's Gordon, but he doesn't get to do enouh to make you say anything more than the fact that it's a solid performance - until the bitter end, that is. But Aaron is solid the whole way through and when he becomes Two Face, I have to agree with Peter - you get to watch his descent into insanity.and he plays it to the bone (no pun intended ... okay, FULLY intended). Xtian Bale is probably the best Batman so far, but that ridiculous growl he uses when he's in the cowl is obnoxious and distracting. A subtle gruffness would have been sufficient, Xtian - and please don't come kick my ass for saying that.
Also, did anyone else notice Spawn (Michael Hai White) as Gamble? I was the only one in the theater screaming, "YO! THAT'S SPAWN!" But I am a geek.
Dave | August 5, 2008 11:48 AM
Gary Oldman - End of Story. After years of Russian terrorists, Dracula, and one dreadlocked pimp, Gary oldman gets an honest-to-goodness- "good guy" role, and in the Drak Knight, he takes it to the bank. In Batman Begins, he had to be the tired, defeated idealist looking for hope. This means, you can drive the Batmobile, but no yelling. But in the Dark Knight, with his family threatened, he explodes in the most relatable way. In the script, it's all about the Joker, and a close second Harvey. But, with all due respect to Heath, Christian, and Aaron, in the theater it's all about Jim. You knew he really couldn't be dead, but when he pops up with the gun on the Joker after the semi crash, the entire room cheered the loudest sheer of the night.
alex | August 5, 2008 11:28 AM
Christian Bale displayed plenty of emotion. The scene where he's got the bat mask in his lap after Rachel Dawes dies and Alfred is talking to him is a great example. Christian Bale is the rock of that movie. Everyone was great in it, Eckhart's two-face makeup and CGI grew on me immensely from the first to third time seeing the movie. The Dark Knight is a masterpiece.
Juan Carlo | August 5, 2008 11:10 AM
Peter, why do you do these things? 2nd place? In THIS film? Oh God...
I'm gonna take the easy way out and say both Oldman and Eckhart. The thing is, we all KNEW that Oldman was a killer actor, it's just that he was in severe danger of being typecast as a villain.
Eckhart, on the other hand, hadn't received his due, though I also second the notion that THANK YOU FOR SMOKING was his best so far. But he hadn't had the big, visible role that could show his abilities, and hey, how much bigger can you get?
I do admit that the Harvey Dent/Two-Face transit was a bit forced, but I bought it anyway.
Sherry | August 5, 2008 11:00 AM
Christian Bale is the heart, soul, glue, and whatever else that holds these movies together. When he is on screen ,especially as Bruce Wayne, my heart stops! He is amazing.
Second, Gary Oldman - amazing to see him play this role after recently watching 'Sid and Nancy'.
Aaron Eckhart isn't even in the top five.
Anonymous | August 5, 2008 9:26 AM
Am I the only person that could have done without the entire Two Face plot? Eckhart was great, don't get me wrong, but when he became Two Face it just ran too long for me and I was getting bored whenever there was a scene not involving The Joker in the end. The Two Face special effects were awful. He looked like the Terminator. I could have done without that entire plot twist in the end. Why couldn't they save that for the 3rd installment? It just felt too rushed for me, seeing him change into Two Face and then getting killed 40 minutes later.
storyteller | August 5, 2008 2:50 AM
after Ledger, I wanna say Gary Oldman Strictly because of the way Oldman is in real life. He's a mumbling brit, you can't understand half of what he says. After Oldman I would go with Bale. The Scene where he is talking to Gordon after getting hit in the Lamborgini where he acts like a total oblivious asshole is so brilliant, I loved it. THEN I would say Eckhart. Maybe it was the writing, but there too many times he had to scream "RACHEL!!". I could hear people giggling in the theatre.
I don't agree with anyone who liked Maggie Gyllenhals character. She was so disposable, I called that she would be killed off as soon as I heard Katie Holmes wasn't coming back. Could a character be that important if a studio decides to just recast the character and pretend we don't notice? They wanted to make that character the eye candy with some substance, be she had no substance, so why not get better eye candy like the drop dead gorgeous Natalie Portman who is in my opinion a better actress the Gyllenhal anway.
Marty J | August 5, 2008 2:49 AM
1. Heath Ledger - Iconic, anarchic, mesmerizing & Fun.
2. Gary Oldman - Dignified, genuinely heroic and professional.
3. Aaron Eckhart - epitome of an idealist corrupted by a 'terror' climate.
4. Michael Caine - Just for the Burma story.
5. Tiny Lister - Amazing how one little piece of dialogue can sound so powerful.
Chris Price | August 5, 2008 2:26 AM
I agree with everyone who says Oldman. What a great character Jim Gordon is in these Batman movies.
tom | August 5, 2008 1:37 AM
gary oldam all the way. Eckhart was good but unconvincing at times, and his character was rushed when he became two face. After that, Michael Cane.
Joe | August 5, 2008 1:21 AM
this is a great Eckhart performance, but his best was "Thank You For Smoking," especially when he starts arguing with children in a classroom about medical reports: "Is your mommy a doctor? Well, that means she's not a credible witness, now, is she?" Priceless.
Anonymous | August 5, 2008 1:07 AM
no2. maggie (as rachel daws)
no3. gary oldman
no4. morgan f. and m. caine
no.5 eric roberts
eckhart was the weakest thing in the movie
two face CGI was horrible
yuk
matt | August 5, 2008 1:04 AM
Ledger number 1. Eckhart i'd say no 2. However I didnt like the make-up/digital effect of two-face and kinda put me off his acting for a while their, but good actor nonetheless. Bale is fine as Batman. But Ledger and Eckhart just stole the show.
matt | August 5, 2008 12:26 AM
It's hard to decide who gave the best 2nd performance. One thing's for certain though: all the actors gave amazing performances. The Dark Knight is proof that not all big budget blockbusters have to be dull and juvenile.
Keegan | August 4, 2008 11:23 PM
Everyone who bashes Christian Bale for being emotionless and boring doesn't understand the nature of Bruce Wayne's character. I won't disagree with Travers in that Eckhardt's performance is more memorable because, as he explains, there is more depth to the character Harvey Dent. Bruce Wayne had little to no social life growing up, and must portray himself as a careless playboy to detract any notion that he is in fact Batman. Also, the complaints about his voice as Batman I don't quite get because the point is to conceal his identity; this isn't Christian's fault but a difficult translation from page to screen. So yes, Eckhardt definitely does deserve his props, and would totally make an excellent captain america, but I think Bale is taking way too much unnecessary criticism, and not receiving enough praise.
Rod | August 4, 2008 10:06 PM
now i thought everyone was good. there wasn't a weak link in the whole movie.
but im not sure about eckhart being second best. he was great. but his performance wasn't one that stayed in my mind for a week. it was the joker and batman. ledger and bale.
im won't put eckhart down. im just saying...
Frank T.J Mackey | August 4, 2008 9:51 PM
My rankings (Briefly):
1. Heath Ledger - Memorable from start to finish
2. Aaron Eckhart - Gives two radically different personalities in one movie.
3. Gary Oldman - Compassionate, honest, and willing to place his life on the line in order to protect the city. Not something you would expect from Oldman.
4. Christian Bale - Performance works best when he's quiet and uses his facial expressions to convey emotions and communicate with the audience.
5. Everybody else -- Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, Maggie Gyllenhaal. They did not act in the movie, they just swam.
Great performances from all, but Ledger and Eckhart are working on a higher level than everybody else.
Edward | August 4, 2008 8:50 PM
The second best performance in The Dark Knight came from Chin Han as Lau. The best performance came from Eric Roberts as Maroni. Remember, there are no small parts, just small tail credits and lesser billing. When it comes to a complete performance without a false beat, I'd give it to William Fichtner as the Bank Manager... flawless. I propose we give a Golden Globe to Tiny Lester... he is the true heart and soul of the film.
J | August 4, 2008 8:37 PM
Eckhart gives the 1st best performance of the film. Ledger is second.
JP | August 4, 2008 7:57 PM
I finally saw it this weekend. Easily, Aaron Eckhart gave the best performance in the movie. He carried the movie. After all, it was about the transformation of Harvey Dent into Two-Face. Heath Ledger was alright as Joker, but it was that great just different. Christian Bale is still annoying as Batman. Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman (hopes he gets well soon), and Michael Caine were all great in their roles, but didn't have alot to do except to advance the plot.
So, to answer your question, Heath Ledger gave the 2nd best performance in the movie.
shakespeare | August 4, 2008 5:30 PM
You are all fools, Gary Oldman gave the second best performance in that film. Even though the Aaron did a good job, Gary made you feel his performance. It didn't have to be over the top unlike most of the performances in the film. Gordon was a family man who wants to see Gotham reborn to true justice, and that comes out in garys performance especially at the end when he is made to chose. Which of his family he loves the most! I be damned the man can play anything and he still doesnt get the respect from the film critics like he deserves, or the academy. One day Gary, one Day!
Donovan | August 4, 2008 5:25 PM
I have to give it to Bale for playing three versions of Bruce Wayne. I especially liked "a-hole" Bruce Wayne.
Jud Richards | August 4, 2008 5:10 PM
My Favorite Performance was Anthony Michael Hall's as the News Reporter cause I was shocked that it was indeed him. Found out via IMDB...such great method acting.
Marc | August 4, 2008 4:37 PM
I thought Eckhart was great as Harvey Dent, but terrible as wo-Face. Well, not terrible, but came off as a slightly more intimidating version of "Professor Chaos". (Masterfully protrayed by Butters in the South Park series)
RickB | August 4, 2008 4:34 PM
Dent: "what was that name they used to call me down in Internal Affairs?"
Gordon: "I-I..uh..don't remem.."
Dent: "sayy itt...JJUSTT SSAYY ITT!!"
brilliant
Mandela | August 4, 2008 4:15 PM
This years scariest moment, however, is when Eckhart yells at Oldman. It sent chills my way like nothing else this year has.
Mandela | August 4, 2008 4:13 PM
He obviously has not been given much to do with a character who is in all actuality rendered very one dimensional by the script, but Gary Oldmen has been able to provide very subtle depth to Comissioner Gordon and flesh him out.
Corkey | August 4, 2008 3:16 PM
mee no like magy gylinhalll she very ugly look like turtle poo
Georgie Boy | August 4, 2008 3:15 PM
Thank you for acknowledging my work.
Dan S. | August 4, 2008 3:13 PM
While she wasn't given a lot to do, I maintain there is not a device or calculation method in existence that could quantify how much better Maggie Gyllenhall is than Katie Holmes.
miles64 | August 4, 2008 3:12 PM
Georgie Boy -
I saw your post at EW's web-site about David A. You have serious issues, dude!
Corkey | August 4, 2008 3:10 PM
me like alfwed he funni
Emily | August 4, 2008 3:08 PM
I saw Conversations with Other Women and have been in love with Aaron Eckhart ever since. Oh, and he is a pretty good actor too.
miles64 | August 4, 2008 3:08 PM
Christian Bale should not be under-rated. Everyone does a fine job, but it is Bale and Ledger who give the movie its heft and its balance. They "complete" each other.
Pskid | August 4, 2008 3:06 PM
I think Aaron Eckhart's performance was the best of the movie. He should get a supporting actor nod at the least... Ledger was really good, don't get me wrong, but I think Eckhart's was better...
jokerfan | August 4, 2008 2:53 PM
i agree completely with travers. Aaron eckhart's two face was portrayed amazingly
Kevin | August 4, 2008 2:47 PM
Michael Caine as Alfred gives the 2nd best performance...he just didn't get enough screen time to be recognized...He was the one who told Bruce that Batman should persevere because he could make the decision that know one could make...he put the Joker and his motives in perspective...he made the decision about Rachel's letter and convinced Bruce to keep going even after Rachel's death...He nailed the most powerful scenes in the movie...he just wasn't in it enough to get the 2nd best performance..
Jordan | August 4, 2008 2:40 PM
I have to go with Gary Oldman over Eckhart - Oldman stole every scene he was in besides the ones with Ledger. Eckhart seemed better at the first half of the movie, the calculating lawyer type and wasn't as impressive as two face.
saad | August 4, 2008 2:34 PM
i agree, eckhart was the second best performance in the movie, followed by gary oldman's commissioner gordon, bale's batman, and morgan freeman's lucious fox.
Abdulnasir Imam | August 4, 2008 2:17 PM
I always thought Eckhart was one of those actors who didn't get appreciated for his talent, perhaps because he didn't appear in blockbuster movies, but rather movies with more drama to them.
NZ | August 4, 2008 1:10 PM
Agree..... My fave scene was toward the end, with Dent in the hosp, with the final transition from good --> evil. "Do you remember what they used to call me??"
Intense!!
Eric | August 4, 2008 1:03 PM
Eckhart was un-doubtedly good but personally I would have to say Gary Oldman's potrayal as Commiossioner Gordon brought out more human emotions. Gordon was a major factor of the movie's heart and soul.