When did you first go online?
Probably about '94, I'd seen an article in a newspaper about the
World Wide Web, and the page they showed looked like a magazine and
I thought "Wow, it's like a fanzine or something." And I happened
to be at the graphic design company that was doing our album sleeve
at the time and they had a browser up. I asked if I could have a
look around and I was hooked. My immediate thought was that you
could create your own magazine.
When did your site launch?
We started designing it in '94 and it must have been online late
'94 or early '95. I thought of it as new medium that needed
learning, like in the same way you pick up a guitar or PC or some
other manual. If you want to make it work for you, you have to
learn the rules. The first thing I did was design some basic page
ideas in a graphics program like Quark on a Mac. I remember
spending nights looking at code and kind of working it out for
myself. Then I bought a book.
What attracted you to the Web?
The thing that really [got me excited] about the Internet was the
speed of information. I wanted to create a fanzine for the band and
I thought this is all I really need to do...I had no idea how big
our potential fanbase was at this point. It came about at an
interesting point for us. We lost our record deal with WEA
(Warner/Elektra/Atlantic), after ten years with them, in the
beginning of the '90s. And I felt, for a moment, in limbo. We
hadn't found a new deal, I had a terrible thought that perhaps this
might be the end. We might be a dinosaur band. And I felt like the
least we could do is have a Web site and maybe an independent deal,
and begin again on a more modest level. I saw the Web site as very
much a part of this cottage industry we could hold on to. And of
course, within six months, we signed to Virgin and things were
upwards again.
How often do you contribute to your site?
I look at the site every day. I have a laptop with remote access so
I can update it at any point. I spend most of my time on the news
pages because they need the most refreshing, and once a month I
scan through the whole site because you'd be surprised how much of
the language that was appropriate six months ago suddenly seems
dated. You use a phrase like "the album from last year" and it
actually becomes "the album from two years ago." I hate it when
sites haven't been updated for like nine months.
Any newsworthy recent additions?
Early last year we set up a really good thing where we put up a
page for something called a chart vote. And we basically had a
pop-up menu with every single recording we ever made. About 120
recordings. And you can select your favorite song. And it's
automatically added to a CGI bin and updated to a chart before your
eyes. And you can influence your favorite recording. Every time a
fan votes, it's registered within a matter of seconds. Then you can
click and see the updated chart, see what people on the Internet
have voted for as the top twenty Everything But the Girl songs.
We've only had it up and running six months.
What sites do you enjoy?
I regularly look at the BBC site for news and sport coverage. I
have a few pet sites that I do use quite a bit like Hard to Find
Records (htfr.co.uk). It's a really good site, especially for
anyone in the dance community. It's basically a big warehouse in
Birmingham, England, and they have a pretty comprehensive online
search engine, you can order online, and they just introduced
secure encryption. I used to just see it online and then order by
phone because I didn't fancy giving my credit card details. But now
it's got secure encryption and I don't mind at all...I buy books
through Amazon; I'm amazed at how quickly it works. It's
incredible. There's a really good graphics book that just came out
called Sampler, which is like the history of album designs
on CD.
Why haven't you posted any MP3 files?
I haven't gotten there yet to be honest. I am very aware of the
industry's nervousness about MP3. It might be interesting to use it
for things like live tracks or promos. But I'm also aware that I'm
kind of under contract with both Virgin and Atlantic, and I can't
just be casual about my music. In a wonderful anarchic world, in a
boundary-free world of the ultimate Internet experience, I would
love to cut a track in my studio, put it up in MP3, and let people
do what they want with it, just for the crack. But I am a signed
artist and I have to be careful about how we use it. I think that's
a difficult issue for established artists. I can see how it's an
absolute Godsend to unsigned groups. Having said that, when the
world really catches on to MP3, who is really going to wade through
it all? That's what I wanna know. At record stores, those are
records that A&R departments have deemed worthy of release;
we're talking about any old guy can put up some terrible track.
Does piracy scare you?
Piracy on a small scale is flattering. I mean just now there's been
a bit of hoo-ha because a bootleg of "Five Fathoms" has been
appearing in dance stores on the East Coast for $11, and it's six
days ahead of the real promo release. Everyone up at the dance
department at Atlantic is going mad about it. They're going, "How
do they do this? It's $11 and it's a crap pressing. These guys just
kill me." And I'm thinking, really this is quite flattering that
we're deemed a group worthy of bootlegging a week in front of a
promo let alone in front of a commercial release. But I think
wide-scale piracy is just unfair. There was a scam going on for
years in Southeast Asia. Artists used to wonder why they didn't
sell very many records in places like the Philippines and stuff.
And it was largely because here was a huge bootleg market. The
bootleg cassette market was just out of control. Yeah great, you
have lots of fans, but you don't get any reward for the work you've
put in. It's just a thorny issue.
Will you ever sell downloadable music?
It's not an impossibility but I hope it's not the complete future.
I mean maybe the next thing will be that you have to hook up your
printer as well. Go to another site and download the artwork and
assemble it yourself.
Does computer literacy affect your music?
At all levels, whether it's the microwave or doing your tax
returns, it's just so much faster with a little chip to work with.
That's true for home PC use, word processing, residence association
newsletters, and right through to artists and musicians. Working
with sequencers and computers means you can work incrementally
through a piece of music in minute detail very fast. It's just an
aid to the imagination.
JAMES OLIVER CURY
(October 1, 1999)
Email
AIM
Del.icio.us
DiggThis
Fark It!


- Portions of Album Content Provided by All Music Guide © 2008 All Media Guide, LLC.