Album Reviews

Photo

Aerosmith

Rocks

RS: Not Rated Average User Rating: 5of 5 Stars

1993

Play View Aerosmith's page on Rhapsody

Whether or not Rocks is hot depends on your vantage point. If your hard-rock tastes were honed in the Sixties, as this band's obviously were, Aerosmith is a polished echo of Yardbirds' guitar rock liberally spiced with the Stones' sexual swagger. If you're a teen of the Seventies, they are likely to be the flashiest hard-rock band you've ever seen. While the band has achieved phenomenal commercial success, their fourth album fails to prove that they can grow and innovate as their models did.


The most winning aspect of Rocks is that ace metal producer Jack Douglas and the band (listed as coproducers for the first time) have returned to the ear-boxing sound that made their second album, Get Your Wings, their best. The guitar riffs and Steven Tyler's catlike voice fairly jump out of the speakers. This initially hides the fact that the best performances here—"Lick and a Promise," "Sick as a Dog" and "Rats in the Cellar"—are essentially remakes of the highlights of the relatively flat Toys in the Attic. The songs have all the band's trademarks and while they can be accused of neither profundity nor originality, Aerosmith's stylized hard-rock image and sound pack a high-energy punch most other heavy metal bands lack.

Steven Tyler is the band's obvious focal point, a distinction earned primarily by his adaptation of the sexual stance of Jagger for a generation that missed the young Jack Flash. On the rockers, his delivery is polished and commanding and sufficiently enthusiastic to disguise the general innocuousness of the lyrics. On the riff-dominated songs, though, such as "Last Child" or "Back in the Saddle," he is prone to shrieks that don't bear repetition. Unlike Jagger, his vocal performance cannot save otherwise mediocre material.

The material is Rocks' major flaw, mostly pale remakes of their earlier hits, notably "Dream On," a first-album ballad that helped make the complete Aerosmith catalog gold. Aerosmith may have their hard-rock wings, but they won't truly fly until their inventiveness catches up to their fast-maturing professionalism.

JOHN MILWARD
(RS 218 - July 29, 1976)

(Posted: Jul 29, 1976)

Advertisement

News and Reviews

loading...

Click "Copy Me" to add the RS.com Widget to your Facebook page, blog, MySpace page and more.

Advertisement

Review 1 of 2

EinarBeinhard writes:

5of 5 Stars


Topping Toys in the Attic with this perfectly titled hard rock swagger Aerosmith earned their commercial success with Rocks. Most of the album is devoted to Aerosmith's knack for coming up with sleazy, blooze-inspired heavy rock as proven on brilliant tracks as "Last Child" and "Rats in the Cellar", but the heart of the album is; that it doesn't have any heart, it's pure, loud fun. Rocks has got more back-bone to it than Toys in the Attic, the album material is better, and though it doesn't contain the major hits of "Sweet Emotion" and "Walk This Way" it's got hard-punching tracks as "Back in the Saddle", "Sick As a Dog" and "Lick and a Promise". Rocks is a 70ties hard rock classic and stands as probably Aerosmith's finest hour.

Jan 15, 2007 22:41:31

Off Topic Report Abuse

Review 2 of 2

studentandlovinit writes:

4of 5 Stars


Oh dear, Rolling Stone goes badly wrong again. This album is generally rated (along with Toys in the Attic) to be Aerosmiths finest hour, the real Aerosmith before they started making novelty rap or acting like BonJovi clones. Quoted by Guns n' Roses Slash as the album that inspired him and on which a large part of their sound was based on, this is hard rock at its best. Whether you think thats a good thing or not will obviously affect your view of this album but if you're a fan of hard rock, I'd recomend this album.

May 28, 2006 15:25:36

Off Topic Report Abuse

Previous Next

 

 


Advertisement

Advertisement